For those who wonder how it can happen…read this girl’s experience… this is grooming. No one can say they wouldn’t fall for it. You’re young, starting to notice boys, someone mature is giving you nice attention. Slowly then all at once.
I was 11 when I first met him, I was wearing those jelly sandals and a summer dress with daisies on it. I was walking to meet a friend in Lund Park, Keighley, but we always met halfway near the doctors to make it “safer”.
I was not a young woman, I was a child.
The Manchester Model. What It Actually Looks Like Up Close.
Andy Burnham is asking the country to trust him with Downing Street on the strength of what he calls the Manchester Model. Eight years of integrated public services and progressive governance that he says Britain should adopt nationally. Before the country decides, it should know what that model actually produced.
Start with the money.
£578 million in public money was lent by Burnham's Greater Manchester Combined Authority to a single developer, Daren Whitaker of Renaker. A tribunal found that GMCA failed to obtain a statement of assets and liabilities from Whitaker before lending, exposing taxpayers to a risk the tribunal described as potentially wiping out the public funds. A meeting between a senior GMCA officer and Whitaker at which loan terms appear to have been agreed produced no minutes or notes. Court papers allege Renaker presented high profit figures to the GMCA when seeking loans and low profit figures to Manchester City Council when seeking exemption from affordable homes requirements. The Court of Appeal is considering judgment on whether the loans were lawful.
Out of 11,000 homes built with that public money, 503 are classed as affordable. Less than five percent. Whitaker's personal fortune grew from £140 million to £698 million during Burnham's mayoralty. The luxury towers were marketed to Chinese buy to let investors through Hong Kong estate agents. Hundreds of flats have been sold to Asian investors according to Telegraph analysis of Companies House filings.
Now the transparency.
In April 2026 the Information Commissioner issued a practice recommendation to the GMCA for failing to publish Freedom of Information compliance statistics. Greater Manchester Police, under Burnham's authority as Police and Crime Commissioner, was separately issued with an ICO enforcement notice for 850 overdue FOI requests, more than 800 over six months old. The oldest had been waiting two and a half years.
Now the transport flagship.
The Bee Network has absorbed a £30 council tax precept increase in two years to subsidise its operation. The £115 million Clean Air Zone was scrapped after £211 million in public funds was received and only £22.5 million returned. Burnham's own transport commissioner acknowledged the network remains twenty two years behind London. The board of Be.EV, the company holding the Bee Network's public EV charging contract, includes Burnham's wife, who joined the company six years into his mayoralty and was appointed to the board as his Westminster ambitions became increasingly visible.
Now the promises.
Burnham pledged to end rough sleeping by 2020. Rough sleeping rose. Today 18,000 people across Greater Manchester have no permanent address. He promised Platt Bridge a flood solution by 2018. The area flooded in 2015, 2021 and on New Year's Day 2025. The projected solution is now 2028. When asked on Question Time why he would not apologise, he said it was before his time. He became Mayor in 2017. The promise was made in 2018.
Now the politics.
Labour's candidate to replace Burnham as Mayor is Bev Craig, leader of Manchester City Council, the body that accepted Renaker's low profit figures and granted the affordable homes exemption. The mayoral by-election on 30 July will be fought under the supplementary vote system rushed through the Lords two days before Burnham's Makerfield victory, designed to consolidate left of centre second preferences and lock out Reform.
108 Labour councillors lost their seats in Greater Manchester in May's local elections. The region Burnham governed for eight years delivered the most devastating local election result in Labour's history.
This is the Manchester Model. These are its documented facts. The country is being asked to implement it nationally. It should read the small print first.
Bev Craig. Labour's candidate to replace Burnham. Leader of the council that granted Renaker's affordable homes exemption.
🚨 EXPOSED: THE BRUTAL COST OF A BURNHAM PREMIERSHIP.
Keir Starmer is barely out of the door, and the Labour establishment is already preparing to raid your bank account.
Andy Burnham’s economic blueprint has leaked, and it is a complete disaster for the British middle class.
He is backing a scheme to scrap council tax and replace it with a new annual property tax of 0.48% of your home's value. 🤡
If you live in an average £553,000 house, you will be forced to pay £2,654 every single year just for the privilege of living in your own home.
But the Labour tax grab gets even worse. 💷
Burnham wants to hike the top rate of income tax to 50p.
His economic advisers are also pushing to scrap capital gains tax and tax your investments and dividends at full income tax rates.
He is even proposing a flat 10% care levy on all inheritance, dragging millions of ordinary families into a death tax on their loved ones' estates from pound one.
They are coming for everything you have built.
And look at how quickly they will lie to your face just to get your vote.
To win the Makerfield by-election last week, Burnham promised WASPI women he would "stick by" them and deliver billions in pension compensation.
The second the vote was over, his team immediately backflipped and admitted they have zero plans to pay it. 🤡
They ruled out cash payouts entirely, offering them taxpayer-funded bus passes instead.
They treat the public like absolute fools while using your hard-earned wages to fund their political ambitions.
The global financial markets are already panicking.
The yield on 10-year gilts spiked the second Starmer resigned because Burnham openly declared he wants to stop being in hock to the bond markets, which is code for massive, reckless state borrowing.
This will drive UK mortgage rates and business loans through the roof, leaving everyday families to pay the price.
Labour has simply changed the face in Downing Street, but the plan to bleed the working class dry remains exactly the same.
RT to warn the country and expose this massive Labour tax grab! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
@cillianblack Every time I see this particular quote from the report I feel physically sick. Just imagining what that poor girl went through and what dirty filthy state the men were that did that to her. The hygiene and the smell. I can’t say what I really think but you can probably guess.
Since 2016, the Mayor of London has been Sadiq Khan, a second-generation Pakistani immigrant and devout Muslim. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is also a Pakistani Muslim. The leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Anas Sarwar, is a Pakistani Muslim. There are currently 26 Muslim Members of Parliament, 4 Muslim members of the Scottish Parliament, including the former First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf. 2 members of the Welsh Parliament are Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, is a Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Newham, Rokhsana Fiaz, is a Muslim. 2 London Assembly Members are Muslim. 18 peers in the House of Lords are Muslim. And in 2025, at least 8 ceremonial mayors, who do not wield executive power but whose role is to normalise the Islamisation of Britain, were Muslim.
The UK, however, is not only run by its politicians but also by its civil service and the army of administrators at every level of the state apparatus and civil society. Placing a Muslim in charge of Britain’s capital city for a decade is one very obvious way to implement the Islamisation of Britain. Placing a Muslim in the office of Home Secretary is another. Placing a Muslim at the head of Ofsted is another. But the infiltration of the UK state by Muslims goes far beyond the scores of Muslims who now sit at the head of our councils, in the mayoralties of our cities, in our legislature and in the House of Lords.
It’s largely unknown to the general public, but Muslims have created a network of political, civil, military, legal, police, media, educational, health, financial and charitable bodies working towards the Islamisation of the United Kingdom.
Within the UK’s Government and Civil Service there operate today the Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN), the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development) Muslim Staff Network, the Civil Service Islamic Society (CSIS), the Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK).
Within the UK military there operates the Armed Forces Muslim Association (AFMA).
Within the UK judiciary there operate the Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML), the Muslim Lawyers’ Hub and the Muslim Lawyers Action Group (MLAG).
Within the parallel Sharia judiciary there operate the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) and the Muslim Law (Sharia) Council.
Within the UK’s police forces there operate the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), the Association of Muslim Police (AMP) at the Metropolitan Police, the West Yorkshire Association of Muslim Police (AMP), the Scottish Police Muslim Association (SPMA) and the City of London Police Association of Muslim Police (AMP).
Within UK media there operate the BBC Muslim Network, the Channel 4 Muslim Network, the ITV Muslim Staff Network Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), the Islam Channel, British Muslim TV, Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA International), the Ummah Channel, Ahlebait TV and 5Pillars.
Within the UK’s education sector there operate the Muslim Teachers’ Association UK (MTAUK), the Association of Muslim Schools and Institutes (AMSI), the British Muslim Teachers’ Association and the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS).
Within the UK’s health sector there operate the National Muslim Staff Network (NMSN) and the NHS Muslim Network.
Within the UK’s charities there operate the Islamic Relief UK, Muslim Hands UK, Muslim Aid, Ummah Welfare Trust (UWT), Muslim Global Relief, the National Zakat Foundation (NZF) and the Muslim Charity UK.
And within the parallel Sharia financial system there operate 5 fully Sharia-compliant banks (Al Rayan Bank, Gatehouse Bank, the Bank of London and the Middle East, United Bank Limited and the Ahil United Bank), as well as 25 conventional banks which offer Sharia finance alongside conventional finance.
Other nation-wide Islamic organisations operating in the UK include the Association of British Muslims (AoBM), the British Muslim Network (BMN), the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the Islamophobia Response Unit.
In my book I look at how these various Muslim organisations and their financial backers in the Islamic world work together to lobby the UK Government and Members of Parliament to write and pass legislation that furthers the Islamisation of Britain.
The most recent example of the influence of such Muslim groups on UK legislation is the UK Government’s adoption of the definition of anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia written by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims. An organisation composed exclusively of Muslims, including 21 Muslim MPs and 5 Muslim Peers, this APPG is funded by the Aziz Foundation, a charity founded in 2015 by Asif Aziz, a Malawi-born Muslim property developer and billionaire whose company, Criterion Capital, has investments worth £6 billion in Britain, and who, since 2024, has been a tax exile in Abu Dhabi.
Another indication of how these Muslim organisations operate closer to the corridors of power — indeed, with the offices stationed off them — is the Civil Service Muslim Network, which lists, among its stated aims, the following:
•Represent, support, connect and champion Muslim civil servants across government.
•Generate a better understanding of Islam within the Civil Service and challenge discrimination and misconceptions.
•Create a network of senior allies who recognise the lived experience of Muslim colleagues and help improve religious literacy and respect.
Doubtless I’m not the only British person who cannot understand why such a network should be required in the UK if Britain is still a secular society rather than one, as I believe, that is already operating under aspects of Sharia law modelled on its implementation in Pakistan; or why it should not only be tolerated but given a place in our civil service, except as a platform — one of many built in Britain and largely with the taxes of the British people — for the Islamisation of Britain.
As for Muslim organisations operating within our police forces and legal system, it is contrary to the principle of police being officers of UK law, the adjudication of courts over sentencing under that law, and of everyone in Britain, irrespective of their religion, being equal before the law. The two-tier policing of the British people, the decades-long cover-up of the Muslim rape-gang network operating in 149 constituencies that we know of across Britain, and the gross travesties of justice handed down by these courts to Muslim rapists, murderers and terrorists is further confirmation that the UK is, indeed, already operating under Sharia law.
Like the UK’s 85 known Sharia Courts, which oversee child marriages in contravention of UK law, these Muslim associations, Muslim societies, Muslim committees, Muslim councils, Muslim non-governmental organisations, Muslim APPGs and Muslim networks have created a civil service, legal system and police force that operates within, but independent from and contrary to, the laws of the UK, which they seek to change through political lobbying of our Parliament and Government. Again, this is consistent with Sections 4 and 14 of Pakistan’s Enforcement of Sharia Act, 1991, according to which ‘Laws [are] to be interpreted in the light of Sharia, and ‘The State shall take adequate measures for the Islamisation of the judicial system.’
Finally — although this list doesn’t approach exhausting the influence of Islam in British society — in addition to these organisations there exists within Britain a terrorist arm with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a transnational Sunni Muslim organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 to promote Islam and Sharia Law.
Fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood known to be currently operating in Britain include the Cambridge Education and Training Center Ltd., IMA6INE Ltd., Wembley Tree Ltd., Waslaforall, Future Graduates Ltd., Yas for Investment and Real Estate, Holdco UK Properties Limited and Nafel Capital Partners, all of which have recently been proscribed by the United Arab Emirates as terrorist groups. Indeed, most of the organisations I’ve listed here are linked by varying degrees of separation to the Muslim Council of Britain and the Muslim Association of Britain, which themselves have links to the Muslim Brotherhood.
It is a measure of how far Britain’s Islamisation has advanced that this organisation operates freely in the UK while being banned as a terrorist organisation in many Muslim countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Kenya, Bahrain, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates, as well as in Russia.
Extraordinarily, in January 2026 the UAE announced that it was excluding UK universities from its approved list for state scholarships, citing the risk of Emirati citizens being radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood operatng on British campuses. Universities where networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood are reported to operate include the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, Queen Mary University of London, the University of Birmingham, the University of Manchester, the University of Leeds, the University of Bradford and the University of Newcastle. The same month, the US Department of State proscribed chapters of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine as designated terrorist organisations.
And there are consequences to harbouring and funding Islamic terrorists in the very country against which they launch their attacks. Six years ago, in 2020, there were 43,000 people on MI5’s terrorist watch list. After the mass migration of half a million Muslims to Britain and more than two-and-a-half years of weekly protests against the war in Gaza, the numbers can only have grown since then.
In 2024, Islamic terrorists accounted for 80% of UK police force’s counter-terror caseload. As of 31 March that year, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges were Islamic terrorists. Muslims have been responsible for 94% of all terrorism deaths, and 88% of terrorism-inflicted injuries, in Britain over the last 25 years. In the last 10 years, the percentages are even higher. One would never guess it from the relentless references to the threat from the mythical ‘far-Right’ by the UK Government and media, but MI5 today lists Islamic terrorism as ‘the most significant threat to the UK by volume’.
As anyone who has lived in Britain since 9/11 knows, this hasn’t happened overnight, and we have repeatedly ignored every warning to the contrary, as we continue to do today. In 2006, when the UK was led by the New Labour Government of Tony Blair and net migration to Britain had increased to over a quarter a million a year, the think-tank, Policy Exchange, published a report titled ‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries’, in which it argued that the British Foreign Office had already, in effect, become a front for The Muslim Brotherhood. Twenty years later, they have been proven right. Today, the UK is run by Muslims.
Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know just how far down the path to becoming an Islamic State Britain is, and what we, the British people, can do to stop it, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN
STARMER'S LIST OF SHAME:
He's about to resign but don't feel sorry for him... just read this.
(in no particular order)
Ignoring Rhianna's mum (her daughter stabbed 20+ times by invader)
King's speech containing policies *nobody voted for*
£200K a month on foreign trips (45 in 22 months/never here)
Biggest electoral wipeout in history
Factories closing due to Net Zero insanity
Bizarrely, bringing previous Labour failures back (Brown/Harman)
Attempted to cancel local elections (knew they would be hammered)
*Bringing previous Labour failures back (Brown/Harman)*
£1bn “reset with EU” when they sell us £100bn more than we sell them
Whipped MPs to become accomplices in his cover-up
£660m to French to do nothing
Undisclosed Palantir meeting with Mandelson
Constantly fibbing to the house
Shoplifting free-for-all (Greggs hiding sandwiches)
Buying votes lifting 2-child benefit cap (90% Muslim)
Freezing pensioners as they don't vote Labour
Employers NI hike/con trick
Letting 438 prisoners out by error
Lied about Durham party (COVID)
McSweeney's convenient mobile phone theft
Flippant "To us, he's just Peter" comment
Ricky Jones cleared after incitement
Imprisoned a mother for a tweet
Sue Gray debacle
Lord Alli buying his wife's clothes
Appointing Hermer/Powell without security clearance
Private schools closing due to VAT attack
Rayner tax fiddling probe
COVID broadcast from Lord Alli's flat (weird)
Most expensive electricity in world
Killing babies/abortion law
Damage USA relationship/idiotic ban on use of bases
Assisted suicide (pensioners don’t vote Labour)
100,000 extra in state schools from independents
Reeves blubbing in commons
Frightening Open AI £34bn investment off
Cabinet £22k Taylor Swift tickets
Reeves rental breach
Labour together - smearing journalists
Donors fast-tracked to jobs
Nick Brown see no evil hear no evil
Labour MP cavorting with TWO sub captains
Reynolds, the fake solicitor
Louise "fingers" Haigh, the mobile thief
Halting North Sea oil licenses (£17bn lost)
Dan Norris, rape charges
Killing off hospitality/pubs
Shovelling £billions to Ukraine (not in NATO)
Secret republican/anti-monarchist
Halting Chagossian food supplies (boats he will stop)
Lammy taxi-ride lies/leaving trash
£22bn "black hole" lie
Tulip Siddiq on run from Interpol
Mystery £750K donor
Andrew Gwynne, "pensioner die" rant
Cut frigates order from 13 to 8
Homeless minister evicting tenants
Needed a court to tell him what a woman is
Reeves lying on CV
Mike Amesbury punching voters
Benefits exceeding income tax (£330bn)
Killing farmers with IHT
300,000 more unemployed
Caplin, Grindr abuse of minor
CCP spy embassy
Chagos scam/treason (Mandelson?)
IRGC not proscribed
Treating pension costs as defence %
Southport 'far-right' disgraceful comments
Recognising Palestine terrorist state
67,000 channel invaders
Muslim two-tier justice
Removing jury trials
Lawfare on NI veterans (for free!)
No navy in middle east
Faking military spending/dragging feet
Strange Czech work camp as young man
Very odd firebombing male models
Nobbling CCP spy case
Islamophobia law
Degraded Gibraltar sovereignty to EU
Removing "HM" from Govt comms
Economy flatlining
Exports crashing
Commie breakfast clubs (buying votes)
Highest tax % ever
£120bn fiscal deficit even after raising taxes
Highest gilts costs of any G7
£500m for pointless Erasmus
Given away fishing rights again to French
Watering down MP responsibilities
Ignored antisemites marching each week
Left scene after cyclist collision (drunk/lie about tailor?)
Voice coach during COVID (breaching mixing rules)
Island of Strangers speech that he denied all knowledge off
Strange un-minuted meetings with Bill Gates/Blackrock
"I'd rather be in Davos, than Westminster" (true colours)
@UKLabour #Starmergeddon
So my friend (follow him) has been digging into the SEND scheme, this is the scheme that blows billions on taxis for supposedly needy kids and makes up a huge chunk of council tax.
Here are some of his findings;
- £2 billion spent in 2025, 166% increase over 10yrs
- in several councils, Pakistani councillors also own the taxi firms awarded these huge contracts
- No competitive tendering evident in some councils
- companies house filings show irregularities for the size of the firms hiding where the money is going
- other evidence suggests Pakistani councillors living on the same road as owners of taxi firms with same surnames
- One such councillor serves on the board of the Zia UI Ummah foundation and has documented ties to the Salaheen foundation and other local mosques with links to religious foundations
These arrangements fund extreme amounts of taxpayer money to Pakistani men.
Put vulnerable children into cars with Pakistani men.
This is our Somali daycare fraud vector.
THE RAPE OF BRITAIN.
You are looking at court listings across London & Kent for next Monday.
Every single one of the sexual offences has a victim. Life destroyed.
Now I’ve included the white English people up for trial.
But the evidence is clear, majority of the rapes, sexual assaults and pedophiles are coming from foreigners.
Here is the evidence. WHY ARE THEY SILENT.
We have a pandemic of sexual violence against women.
Burnham was a Minister in the Blair Government.
A drug dealing Jamaican National asylum seeker, living in the UK attacked a woman with a chisel during a burglary and was jailed for 30 months in 2005.
The Judge put him down for deportation.
When he was freed, Blair's Government forgot to deport him.
2 years later they tried to deport him but it got tied up in court and he was still here in 2015.
Then he broke down the door of Leighann Duffy.
He stabbed her 14 times IN FRONT OF HER 6 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER.
He even hit the child with a hammer when she tried to protect her mummy.
Leighann died 2 days later.
Not one of you will have heard of this victim or her murderer.
The story got very little coverage.
Labour's dereliction of duty cost this Mother her life.
Our Biased Media will always cover up for Labour.
No wonder the groomers got away with it for so long.
Labour must never be forgiven.
https://t.co/S9a5VHQuEC
I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.
I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.
The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.
Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.
This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.
Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.
These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.
This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.
These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.
And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.
It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.
These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.
Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.
Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.
Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.
Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.
NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.
And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.
Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.
As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.
Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.
@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.
The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.
In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.
Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.
@BristolGalt Spot on. They are still walking the streets of Britain. Next time you walk past a Pakistani consider he could be one or know of one who did these things. One girl estimated 2000 men - I’ve never seen 2000 mugshots have you?
In the last eight years, 200,000 illegal immigrants have arrived in Britain by dinghy. Each one costs the British taxpayer £40,000 per year. The average taxpayer pays £11,000 per annum in income tax. That means that around 800,000 British taxpayers are working ALL year, EVERY year, just to pay for those illegal immigrants. Their tax is not going towards fixing roads, defence of the country, schools, hospitals or anything else. It is ONLY going on paying for illegal immigrants to be here in Britain. And that’s only the ones that arrived by dinghy. Millions more just fly in, stay and live for free. You will never work hard enough or pay enough of your hard earned money to have a better life in this country. You will only work your whole life to pay for illegal immigrants to have a better life. Quite depressing really.
The systematic raping of white, Christian girls by Muslim men has been ongoing for hundreds of years (see Crusades).
The fact this is still happening is unsurprising.
The fact those in power let the invaders in, covered it up, enabled them, betrayed their own people, is barbaric.
There is a special circle of hell reserved for everyone involved.
The deepest pit is reserved for the traitors.
This should be read by every child in school so they can be educated about being groomed and also as proof to the young girls that this CAN and DID happen to anyone. Sometimes kids think they know better but maybe reading this in school will prevent some from being victims.
🚨 New
Public Grants on UKGovscan
1.56M UK public grants, including 360Giving, Innovate UK & UKRI, searchable and cross-referenced with Companies House and the charity register
£384bn of grant money from 394 funders. Sport England alone has issued 50,089 grants worth £5.3bn. Comic Relief 2,110 grants totalling £600m. National Lottery 285,139 grants worth £12.2bn
See what they are funding here: https://t.co/GmzeVVMBnn
Banning X in Britain won't stop the beheadings.
It will only stop you from knowing about the beheadings.
And that is the reason the radical leftist govt of Keir Starmer wants to ban X in Britain.