Yet the likes of @TheBeanEyesOpen & @janelvis77 won't admit they were wrong to doxx innocent police officers from false rumours
https://t.co/ERuoBbLElr
This is on people like @TheBeanEyesOpen & @janelvis77 spreading rumours & false information to doxx innocent people.
Something they both have history of on behalf of their beau Cartland
https://t.co/ERuoBbLElr
For the avoidance of any doubt, Nigel Farage is a racist.
He once said his party shouldn't โworry about the n****r vote. They will never vote for us.โ
In 2014 he was asked who should be allowed to Britain, he said: โPeople who do not have HIV, to be frank".
He has defended using the word: 'ch*nky' for a Chinese take away.
He has talked about the "Jewish lobby" and the "new world order" and the "globalist" conspiracy fueling anti-Semitism
He frequently links islam to terrorism, and is hugely islamphobic.
He lied about the identity of the Southport attacker after being 'misinformed' by Andrew Tate - leading to huge riots where many were assaulted and hurt
Farage also excused Trump's misogynistic "grab them by the pussy" remarks and also said that women in work are "worth far less" - he has also talked about abolishing mandatory maternity pay.
And yes it is reported that he "marched through a quiet Sussex village very late at night shouting Hitler Youth songsโ
So yes, he is racist, and he is also sexist.
He is also a millionaire banker with ties to Russia and a hatred for paying his fair share of tax.
Source: https://t.co/mfritNyahm
Good morning to the enlightened, please electrically share this through the feeds and letterboxes of all the simpletons that you know. They can't win. #Farage#FarageRiots
As an oncologist, I would ask a very simple question:
If someone truly cured 100 cancer patients in 5 days using only three herbs in 1992โฆ
Where are the clinical trials?
Where are the pathology reports?
Where are the long-term follow-ups?
Where are the published survival data?
And perhaps most importantly:
Why didnโt the treatment become the most important medical discovery in human history?
A genuine cure for cancer would not remain hidden.
It would win Nobel Prizes.
Transform oncology.
Make its discoverer one of the most celebrated scientists of all time.
Now consider another uncomfortable fact.
Hulda Clark reportedly died from multiple myeloma, a plasma cell cancer.
If she truly possessed a proven cure for cancer, it is reasonable to ask:
Why was she unable to cure her own disease?
This is not a personal attack.
It is a scientific question.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The burden of proof lies with the person claiming to have cured cancer, not with the rest of medicine to disprove it.
Cancer is not one disease.
It is hundreds of diseases.
Breast cancer is different from leukemia.
Leukemia is different from glioblastoma.
Glioblastoma is different from pancreatic cancer.
The idea that three herbs could cure all cancers in five days should immediately trigger skepticism from anyone familiar with cancer biology.
As physicians, we should always remain open to new ideas.
Many modern cancer drugs originated from plants and natural compounds.
Nature is an incredible source of medicine.
But there is a difference between:
โThis herb contains a promising anticancer molecule.โ
and
โThis herb cures all cancers in five days.โ
One is science.
The other is a claim that must be proven.
Patients deserve hope.
But hope must be anchored to evidence.
Because false hope is one of the most dangerous side effects in all of oncology.
If a treatment truly works, it should withstand the scrutiny of data.
And if it cannot withstand scrutiny, then patients deserve to know that too.
I remember when Zack Polanski RT'd a person criticising the Police's excessive use of force.
He was publicly condemned by the MET Chief as if he had committed a serious crime.
Nigel Farage incites riots, AGAIN, and we have complete silence.
Nigel Farage's work over the last 11 weeks broken down:
- Parliamentary votes registered (including on immigration): 0
- Violent racial divisions stoked: 1