slitsommesaker

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@Yvonne00322432 @pimitopomo Freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental human right that protects everyone's right to think, believe, change, or practice any religion—or no religion at all.
Thus, to shun or not to shun is an individual's right based on his /hers conscience.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@Iaintnolocustn1 @pimitopomo october 607 bce to the end of 1 bce = 606 years and 3 months from year 1 bce to oct 1914 ce = 1913 years and 9 months 606+1913+1(as 3+9)=2520...best I can do...
or :) https://t.co/xhN8WSKBwr

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@Iaintnolocustn1 @pimitopomo 607 BC to 1 BC = 606...1 BC to 1 AD =1....1 AD to 1914 AD = 1913.... Thus 606+1+1913 = 2520 ...note: BC and AD the old ones.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo 1914 and 144 000 are cornerstones. Simple as that.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo As I some days ago wrote in a post - the chance of receiving just a part - and not the whole - strongly depends on where you live.100% in rich countries, less than 50% in many countries.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo same old story, same old song...

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo digging. In rich countries (A) no problem separating blood. In poor countries (B) whole blood is still used no matter what the patient lacks. In A 95-98% blood is separated. B often only between 38-52%. Many places even less, and whole blood is still the standard.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo Numbers 23:19 NWT "God is not a mere man who tells lies,+Nor a son of man who changes his mind.*+ When he says something, will he not do it? When he speaks, will he not carry it out?" So, the old doctrine thus did not have God's blessing - or what?

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo Acts 15:29, generally fair enough. But NOWHERE does the Bible say that accepting anything having to do with blood - is a reason to remove anyone! NOWHERE! It's a matter between each one and God himself. (WT once also said so). that's that!

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo If denying had been voluntarily, excellent. If accepting caused punishment - not so.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@hihihihiahahah3 You were not removed in the 1950s.
https://t.co/hGipajJooL
This became the "normal" procedure from 1961.
Watchtower 1961 Jan 15 pp.63-64.
One must be accurate with all nuances.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@Larchwood20 But we see no unreserved apology and plea for forgiveness for the harm caused. All liability is disclaimed.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@_josephine0_ stupidity

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@EXJW_ @Sankei_news It has for sure caused deaths. But we should be very careful to give an estimate if we don't have the medical reports at hand (for each one).

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo There's no need to talk about WHOLE BLOOD today.
Donated blood is separated before used. This is the ABC of blood donation. I agree with you!

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

My mom (not a JW) said to me: Son, be a MAN, face what you've done, never run away from your responsibility.

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@Larchwood20 No one can deny this!

[slitsommesaker @slitsommesaker]

@pimitopomo ...or decades ago...Did we see any sign of repentance?
It was very technical, and sadly...cold (in my opinion).