@ju5tdontcare@Gringoincharge@Backendbag52418@Aliathewhite the fact that he recently attacked the passenger means the driver has reason to believe they are at risk of serious bodily harm. that is the only thing that would need to be decided in a court. as I said, a slam dunk. no duty to retreat exists for this reason.
@ju5tdontcare@Gringoincharge@Backendbag52418@Aliathewhite iβll humor you. self defense is judged at the moment the force is used. the judgement would be over the fact that this man was recently an aggressor, and is now returning aggressively to the vehicle. no duty to retreat means waiting in the car is irrelevant. this was explained.
@ju5tdontcare@Gringoincharge@Backendbag52418@Aliathewhite imminent threat: guy just attacked dudes gf. now heβs approaching drivers side of car
ceased danger: hasnβt happened yet, cause when he starts shooting, guy is still moving towards him.
the waiting is part of no duty to retreat. the guy is approaching him. slam dunk in court.