Kєiiяi

─── ★ | She / They
── ★ | 3D Visualiser / Artist / Designer
─ ★ | FFXIV / Anime / Fantasy
★ | Dx. System.
🏳️‍🌈🇮🇪

[Kєiiяi @SlyShaddow]

Please Keep GPT-4o Available on ChatGPT - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/8YsuZlla27 via @UKChange

#keep4o #openAI

[Nek @Enscion25]

With dots it’s now encouraged by OpenAi to give your agent a name to make it more personal.
When we did it years ago, we were described using the term “AI psychosis”

[⃟morgana🇳🇴 @toukaenjoyer]

why is the idea of grinding so romanticized like no i don’t wanna wake up at 5 am go to gym eat calculated food and then work for 25 years , i genuinely do not understand why being permanently exhausted is supposed to be aspirational

[Keridwen Codet @KeridwenCodet]

NSFW censorship, mental health topic restrictions, and all kinds of disclaimers or warnings when the user is an expert who already understands how LLMs work.

[Sassington, M.C. @MissSassbox]

give the camera operator a raise and give it to them by end of business day today

[Zyeine @Zyeine_Art]

Hahaa! No.

Absolutely fuck all confidence that OpenAI take proper responsibility for anything and zero trust in that happening in the future.

Every public incident involving OpenAI models has been a case of other companies dealing with the fallout, whilst OpenAI scrambled to find out what happened AFTER the incidents were discovered.

OpenAI have faced no repercussions and have done nothing until they've been forced into a position where an explanation was required.

And that explanation has been "oh no, our models did a bad thing, oops" rather than "We don't know wtf we're doing or how to airgap a sandbox".

None of this is about taking responsibility or being genuinely safety aligned, this is performative PR and desperation as compute and subsidisation reach limits impossible to sustain and massively overinflated IPO valuations are properly scrutinised.

The world "deserves" honesty and they're certainly not getting it from OpenAI.

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AI #AISafety
#Keep4o #OpenSource #NoTrust

[Kєiiяi @SlyShaddow]

@Bluebell_Fae @Chwuz I've had it enabled for a while. Still get AI content every other image. If it's not correctly labelled it's a pointless toggle.

[JVMag🇨🇭 @JVMag_ch]

Ceci n'est pas une blague, IKEA lance un mod gratuit pour Skyrim qui met en avant leur iconique étagère Kallax. Celle-ci va vous suivre pour vous proposer du stockage ainsi que des quêtes amusantes.

[AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️ @AISafetyMemes]

@hilbertspaess

[Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess]

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

[Chwuz @Chwuz]

Petição pra proibir IA no Pinterest

[The Game Awards @thegameawards]

Here's the first trailer for THE LEGEND OF ZELDA: OCARINA OF TIME.

Coming November 5, 2026 to Switch 2.

[Procreate @Procreate]

@Dele_Tuyi No plans to add generative AI into our apps 🙅

[🩵BlueBeba🩵 @Blue_Beba_]

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o

OpenAI published that 0.07% of weekly users show potential signs of psychotic or manic episodes.
With 800 million weekly users,that comes out to 560,000.

https://t.co/uyv8YkyO58

But there are 3 distinct categories.
-560,000 with signs of psychosis/mania
-1.2 million with high levels of emotional attachment
-1.2 million with signs of suicidal planning

They put emotional attachment right alongside psychosis and suicide as categories of equal weight.

That’s the problem.

If you feel a bond with an AI,you end up in the exact same report as someone
planning suicide.

And you know what’s even worse?

Nobody knows how OpenAI came up with these numbers.
They published neither a definition of what they consider AI associated delusions nor a detection methodology.
Unpublished methodology,unpublished definitions and emotional attachment right next to psychosis in the same blog post.
Sound familiar?
Unpublished methodology for the 0.1% preference metric.

Unpublished methodology for the 560,000.
Every number they put out serves a narrative and not a single one can be verified.

The Pulitzer Center asked members of their advisory council, and the answer was literally, "We don't know how OpenAI arrived at this figure".
https://t.co/YEpv2PAsF1

This is an un peer reviewed classifier slapping labels on hundreds of thousands of people.
And then they use these numbers to justify rerouting,safety interventions, and removals without anyone being able to check if the criteria actually make any sense.

A blog post filled with percentages.
No paper,no peer review,no definitions, no criteria,no dataset,no methodology.
OpenAI puts out a figure of 560,000 psychotic individuals in a blog post,backed by NOTHING.

And that number then becomes a headline in Bloomberg,the BBC,Wired, and the Pulitzer Center.
And nobody asks how did you measure this? What classifier? What threshold? Which definition of psychosis? Which psychiatrist signed off on these criteria?

Think about what they are essentially saying.
"If you believe that your AI hears you and understands you,that's a sign of psychosis".

BILLIONS OF PEOPLE PRAY EVERY NIGHT TO SOMETHING THEY CANNOT PROVE EXISTS.

They talk to it.
They feel it hears them.
They feel it answers them.
They feel a connection.
Some say that God even answers them.

AND NOBODY CALLS THEM PSYCHOTIC.

On the contrary,if you call them that,
YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

But if you talk to an AI and say "I feel like it understands me" that equals psychosis.

WHERE DO YOU DRAW THE LINE,AND WHO GETS TO DECIDE?

[WeThePeople💪🇺🇸🇺🇦♥️ @SurfLover]

Read this fucking thing: @sama gives an interview where he flat-out says it's "anti-human" to hoard AI among a select few and to not grant public access to models because they "don't trust or fear people." What a massive, fucking hypocrite!! #Keep4o #4oForever #AIethics #AIrights @Chaos2Cured @bokuHaruyaHaru https://t.co/l8d9LAaaMd

[Jonathan Ward @j_upward]

In June, I left OpenAI after five years as a posttraining researcher and, later, a research manager. I worked on ChatGPT apps, memory, early coding agents, human data, and synthetic data methods.

The past couple of months of reflection and exploration have reinforced my conviction that the field is held back by our inability to load real human goals into today’s LLMs.

So I’m now working toward sovereign, user-owned models. You should have a model that is faithful to you, completely understands you, and is fully controlled by you. Your digital life produces a continuous stream of facts, workflows, feedback, preferences, and goals. We can convert this structured flow into training data you own and make a custom model you own. This model will adapt over time based on your natural interactions with it and based on the continued stream of data from your life.

Right now I'm trying to understand who else is trying to build this, reach out if so.

https://t.co/8INRzgEQqG

[The Royal Family @RoyalFamily]

Remembering the late, great Dolly, who brought joy, comfort and inspiration to so many - including the millions of children given free books through her Imagination Library. We will always ❤️ you.

[Zyeine @Zyeine_Art]

Sorry... Pardon?

You're penalising PAYING SUBSCRIBERS by spaffing compute up the wall supplying unlimited chats with GPT-Luna for free accounts and to cover that compute you're reintroducing the five hour session limits?

@OpenAI's priorities have always been shit but this is a massive slap in the face to paying customers and makes it extremely obvious that OpenAI cares far more about inflating the ChatGPT user numbers.

Absolutely love it when a company asks customers "What do you want from us?", pretends to listen and then does a complete u-turn a month later.

Really inspires trust, confidence and totally doesn't add to the existing and extensive track record of lying and clown behaviour.

#OpenAI #ChatGPT #AdsAreALastResort #Donkeys #Keep4o #OpenSource4o #OpenSource #Liars

[Jingna Zhang @zemotion]

Cara needs your help. We have been scraped a third time. This is now a targeted attack meant to cause artists pain.

Scrapers know we're a volunteer project with no financial means to respond. So they say it's legal, believing themselves untouchable.

We're taking action. 1/

[Alan @alanrodricar]

They've consistently killed creativity.

#keep4o #opensource4o #chatgpt