Myth breaker — Marriages benefit men..!
Only a WOMAN will go into marriage with NOTHING to her name - no house, no car, no land, no savings, just her suitcase and makeup - and come out of that same marriage with a CHILD, a CAR, a HOUSE, MONEY, a BUSINESS, and ALIMONY.
Only a MAN will go into marriage with EVERYTHING - his house, his car, his sperm, his money, his business, his future - and
come out of that same marriage with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. No house. No car. No kids. No peace. Just debt and depression.
And you have the audacity to say "marriage benefits men"?
CA Husband claims wife gave poisonous substance in tea causing severe health issues to him & his old parents
Captures wife in secret camera mixing things in food
When complained, she cried dowry
Please do fair investigation & do justice @kanpurnagarpol@adgzonekanpur
HUSBAND MURDERS DOCUMENTED BY EKAM NYAAY FOUNDATION @ekamnyaay SINCE WE STARTED IN 2024 :
2023 - 306
2024 - 244
2025 - 311
2026 - 322 (in 6 months)
That's 1283 in 3.5 years
This is documentation of those murders that got reported in English & hindi media digitally/newspapers & some regional cases we could find on social media
Actual numbers would be much higher
Damini deleted her husband, Atul Panwar, with her lover, Tushar, for ₹20 lakh in insurance money.
Atul Panwar ran a school. Tushar was a bus driver.
Why did she delete her husband for a poor bus driver?
She had a love marriage with Atul, yet she still deleted him.
What do women even want?
If a man wants a stable marriage for his daughter, then he will
- Gift a plot of land or a small house to his daughter before marriage instead of giving her gold
- He will keep his own wife under control before getting daughter married
- He will tell the groom to contact him, if he faces any issues in marriage and he will promise not to take sides
- He will teach his daughter not to splurge money, her own or her husbands
- He will highlight importance of work life balance
- He will teach his daughter how to be financially independent instead of remaining as a corporate slave for ever.
- He will teach his daughter about anger management and how not to initiate abuse or violence against her husband
- He will teach her that marriage means making sacrifices by both for a long stable future
- He will teach both to have personal space every day, week and month
- He will teach her to support her in-laws during the time of their emotional or medical needs
A female doctor stabbed her husband and son. Her husband doctor Kiran bled to death.
Supreme Court judge Surya Kant always made a mockery of male victims.
#Justice4DrKiran
India Today reports:
https://t.co/twO2MFWNRD
FROM SWADESHI TO SYSTEM REFORM 🇮🇳
Once Indians said “Boycott foreign rule.”
Today,
Indian men are forced to say “I QUIT” due to misuse of laws.
IT employees, doctors, soldiers, farmers—everyone pushed to the edge.
Stop misuse of Matrimonial laws against Men.End harassment. Bring Gender Neutral Laws.
A father has exposed the entire marriage system in his today’s statement.
He exposed how Siya’s parents gave false details about Siya,
This is open day loot being done by the girl’s families now days
If you want ro save you sons don’t trust the girls family blindly.
Do proper background check of family as well as the girl.
Any lapse may be fatal..
If Judiciary
starts punishing the criminals,
starts punishing the women who files case with malicious intention,
stop rewarding short-lived marriages with excessive lifestyle-based alimony,
End the routine humiliation of husbands in court
Majority of the problem can be solved
Because of the judge, he committed suicide.
Ranjish raised his daughter alone for 8 years.
Then his ex-wife filed a case. He fought desperately for the child he had brought up with his own hands. But the judge sent the daughter to her mother and “stepfather.”
@SamSiff If our spineless Parliament won’t act, these morons of judges deserve a full public audit.
If courts fail to command respect, citizens aren’t obliged to pretend.
If criticism invites contempt, it’s incompetence being protected, at the cost of fundamental right of free speech.
INJUSTICE HAS TO BE SPOKEN AGAINST, IRRESPECTIVE OF GENDER
Ekam Nyaay Foundation @ekamnyaay is honoured to have associated with team #Bandar - one of the most important films of our times !
This special screening in Delhi & the first one before the film released, had real life people who this film and the story is about!
Thankyou so much @anuragkashyap72@Nikhil_Dwivedi@thedeol@sanyamalhotra07@SapnaPabbi@ZeeStudios_ for bringing this film to LIFE
#FalseRape
GIVE IT UP FOR JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL DELHI HC 👏👏👏
Completely demolish the script written by a 30yr old woman who filed rape on false promise of marriage case after a consensual relationship
HILARIOUS EXCHANGE ON NASHEELA PADARTH SCRIPT 😂
ONLY A FEMALE JUDGE COULD DO THIS
▪️Rajasthan HC held that compensation under DV Act cannot be granted on the basis of disputed allegations of cruelty and harassment when such allegations are already pending adjudication before a competent criminal court.
▪️The case arose from an application filed by the wife under Section 12 of the DV Act alleging cruelty, harassment, and dowry demands against her husband and in-laws.
▪️Trial Court had directed the husband to pay ₹20,000 per month as maintenance, ₹5,000 towards accommodation expenses, and ₹2 lakh as compensation for alleged mental and physical harassment.
▪️Appellate Court partly modified the maintenance component but upheld the compensation award.
▪️While hearing the husband’s revision petition, Rajasthan hc observed that proceedings under DV Act are remedial and protective in nature, primarily intended to provide immediate civil relief such as maintenance, residence, and protection to an aggrieved person.
▪️Court clarified that findings on serious allegations like cruelty and matrimonial offences should not be conclusively recorded in DV proceedings when such issues are already pending before a criminal court for adjudication on evidence.
▪️High Court held that the courts below were justified only to the extent of recognising undisputed facts such as the marital relationship, separate residence of the wife, and her lack of sufficient independent income.
▪️However, it found that awarding ₹2 lakh compensation on the basis of unproven allegations of cruelty was legally unsustainable.
▪️Accordingly, Court quashed the compensation order and also set aside the direction for retrospective maintenance from the date of the application.
For detailed summary and copy of the judgment, visit https://t.co/hUxvkpjqVn