@smithonbase@Nasun_io Nasun building its own Move L1 instead of apps on someone else's chain? Smart power move. Capturing fees, liquidity, and users early watching this one closely.
This is the real DeFi endgame.
Wallets become invisible backend AI agents take over execution.
No more clicking hell. Just say “bridge my ETH, find top yield on Base, auto-compound” and Otto does it perfectly across protocols.
@smithonbase thread is spot on.
Crypto wallets are about to become obsolete.
Not because people stop using them.
But because AI will start using them instead of us.
And projects like Otto Wallet are already building for that future. 🧵
@smithonbase@useOttoAI "Spot on 🚀 Manual DeFi clicking is dead. AI agents like Otto executing bridges, swaps & yield on command is the real onboarding wave. Base + autonomous finance = endgame. Bullish on $OTTO"
Crypto wallets are about to become obsolete.
Not because people stop using them.
But because AI will start using them instead of us.
And projects like Otto Wallet are already building for that future. 🧵
Scaling AI isn’t about adding more agents.
It’s about making sure execution, interaction,
and messaging never drift apart.
That’s the coordination layer @xelebofficial is solving for
not smarter AI, but aligned intelligence.
I’ve spent a lot of time moving stablecoins around, and the friction is subtler than you’d think.
Every swap, even between USDC and USDT, triggers a mental calculation: fees, gas, whether it’s worth it for a small adjustment.
Over time, these micro-decisions add up. I find myself batching actions, delaying transfers, or avoiding on-chain movements that should feel trivial.
Stablecoins are meant to act as a neutral, predictable layer of value, but the combination of protocol fees, network costs, and UX opacity turns what should be simple infrastructure into a series of deliberate, slightly stressful choices.
Spot on zero fees turn stables from “expensive to move” into actual on-chain cash. The real test is whether the UX lets people unlearn the batching habit fast enough. Loving these behavioral observations
I’ve spent a lot of time moving stablecoins around, and the friction is subtler than you’d think.
Every swap, even between USDC and USDT, triggers a mental calculation: fees, gas, whether it’s worth it for a small adjustment.
Over time, these micro-decisions add up. I find myself batching actions, delaying transfers, or avoiding on-chain movements that should feel trivial.
Stablecoins are meant to act as a neutral, predictable layer of value, but the combination of protocol fees, network costs, and UX opacity turns what should be simple infrastructure into a series of deliberate, slightly stressful choices.
@smithonbase@superteam@NovaSwap Spot on zero fees turn stables from “expensive to move” into actual on-chain cash. The real test is whether the UX lets people unlearn the batching habit fast enough. Loving these behavioral observations