Liv

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@DefiyantlyFree https://t.co/PAkgqTOqMc

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER

I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:

Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points

The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.

The Slopes - How the Formula Runs

The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.

So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:

Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%

Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.

The slopes also sum to exactly zero.

+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00

Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.

The R Values - The results were remarkable

To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:

Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794

R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.

0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.

1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.

For context:

0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.

Squaring them to get R² values:

Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968

That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.

You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.

The Slope Relationship

The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.

It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.

Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.

Why The Shutoff Had To Exist

Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:

Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%

So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.

The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.

After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.

The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@jenlynncallahan https://t.co/hLGNypgwVc

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER

I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:

Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points

The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.

The Slopes - How the Formula Runs

The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.

So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:

Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%

Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.

The slopes also sum to exactly zero.

+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00

Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.

The R Values - The results were remarkable

To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:

Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794

R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.

0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.

1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.

For context:

0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.

Squaring them to get R² values:

Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968

That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.

You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.

The Slope Relationship

The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.

It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.

Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.

Why The Shutoff Had To Exist

Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:

Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%

So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.

The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.

After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.

The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@NYCMayor Do you know the difference between legal and illegal?

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@0liviajulianna You never talked like this when it was Joe Biden…STFU

[James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII]

🚨Los Angeles Election Fraud Caught on Hidden Camera

LA election petitioners were caught on tape giving homeless individuals other voters' information, instructing them to forge voter names and signatures, and offering cash and drugs as incentives to register to vote.

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@donatpov Ummm NO!

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Karmelo Anthony's defense RESTS after a DEVASTATING round of witness testimony in the Austin Metcalf murder trial

The anti-white thugs are livid.

The prosecution called 21 witnesses, and it went REALLY poorly for Anthony. Jurors were HORRIFIED

Then the defense started...and ANY SEMBLANCE of "self defense" was WIPED AWAY.

Anthony was shown in court to:
1. NOT have been ambushed
2. CLEARLY the aggressor
3. His own life was NOT in danger, no stabbing was even close to warranted

Anthony SHOULD get capital punishment, but life in prison will have to do.

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@krassenstein If there is no fraud, why won’t they open the books and show them? Why not let the federal government perform the audit

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@TheOfficerTatum Sounds like a threat to democracy

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@brianeskow If they don’t allow voter ID to vote… when they check signature what exactly are they looking at?

They aren’t, it doesn’t matter who signs a ballot

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@THR That’s right… Not requiring voter ID
Ballot harvesting
Paying people on skid row to “ vote”
Democrats love to cheat any way possible they did not win this election

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@southrnsuga @emannymusic As you can see most Americans are tired… We’re tired of young black men thinking they are entitled to act like criminals without any repercussions

When are parents gonna start being held accountable for these little shits that they’re raising?

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@emannymusic Kyle Rittenhouse protected himself against attackers, trying to murder Kyle Rittenhouse

K Anthony killed a young man in cold blood

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@sippicup2 The black supremacist have shown up

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@amyforsandiego This whole election needs to be nullified and redone legally

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@LeadingReport Because they were getting kickbacks… These people would vote for them and give money towards their elections

Pay to play schemes

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@TheJoeySwoll @l_i_n_d_z__ I get a lot of lower back pain and the elliptical is the only thing I can get pretty good exercise in that doesn’t hurt…

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@ofcrdeonjoseph Too many people have their head in the sand….

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@ricchh_kaos @KaydaKing166748 @luongo_stephen @TheOfficerTatum Why did he run?

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@AdamKinzinger @FoxNews He’s literally looking down at papers in this photo…

[Liv @smith_weouthere]

@DerrickEvans4WV So then explain what AMERICA 1ST means to YOU…
Because TRUMP and MAGA IS America 1st!