Rod Phillips is Decoding Climate Science Denialism 24/7
DAILY Disinformation Analyses using the Skeptical Science #FLICC Framework.
Please support my workโ๏ธโ๏ธ
๐งต[๐ญ/๐ณ] ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ข๐
"๐๐ผ๐ผ๐น ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ" - ๐๐ฐ๐จ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ช๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐๐ณ.
https://t.co/8qW0fFACUQ
A #FLICC Critical Analysis
๐ฌ Leave it to a policy wonk to spot a perfectly mundane New York Times op-ed and treat it like a Marxist coup in a tin-pot junta.
Roger Pielke Jr has peered into the dry, academic world of climate modelling and somehow emerged convinced he has uncovered a grand, coordinated heist to smuggle bad data into our wallets. Let's take a peek at the sheer hilarity of his outrage!๐
CO2 COALITION
"A Primer on Climate Policy Math"
https://t.co/uH7UXXclY4
A #FLICC Critical Analysis
๐ช Wading through this absolute chonker of a pdf on a Friday night is like watching a mediocre magician drop his deck, step on the rabbit and then blame the physics of gravity for the subsequent gloopy mess on the carpet.
If you happen to have an entire evening to waste on statistics being mercilessly tortured until they tearfully confess that carbon dioxide is actually a delightful tonic for human lungs, do download and read it for yourself.
However, if you actually have a life, then rest assured that I've endured the actual reading bit on your behalf.๐
It's a work of unvarnished cynicism that manages to treat the laws of atmospheric physics as though they were merely a set of polite, optional suggestions drafted by a particularly tedious parish council.
Sounds ELECTRIFYING, yes? Read on...๐๐งต[๐ญ/๐ณ]
Unlike this denialist post, the World Bank report highlights a critical piece of physics: the difference in solar potential between the absolute best country in the world (Namibia) and the absolute worst (Ireland) is only a factor of about two. In other words, a solar panel in a low-sunlight country like the UK or Ireland still generates roughly half the total annual energy of a panel placed in the scorching Sahara desert. It doesn't drop to zero.
The UK is pushing solar power despite having some of the lowest sunlight levels in the world.
Northern Britain receives less sunshine than even Canada.
According to a World Bank solar resource assessment, the UK ranks among the least suitable countries for solar generation, second only to Ireland in Europe.
Low sunlight means low output and greater reliance on backup power.
Moreover, the UK government has approved solar geoengineering research, experiments designed to dim incoming sunlight.
So the policy is this: build solar in a low sunlight country while exploring ways to block the sun.
๐๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ค๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ that Tice would try to turn a complex, multi-decade story of corporate economics into another of his insufferable "Net Stupid Zero" fairytales?
With the practiced ease of a man who believes solar panels have the power to retroactively shut down mid-century industrial infrastructure, Tice entirely ignores the reality that aging European refineries closed because they could not compete with mega-facilities in Asia and the Middle East.
He furiously scolds the government for "allowing" private corporations to shut down unprofitable storage tanks, a natural consequence of the free-market capitalism he usually worships, while completely missing the irony that the UKโs dangerous vulnerability to a diesel crisis is the direct result of a prolonged, structural dependency on importing volatile fossil fuels from the global market rather than building domestic energy security.๐ฌ๐ง
๐๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ช๐ค๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ that Tice would try to turn a complex, multi-decade story of corporate economics into another of his insufferable "Net Stupid Zero" fairytales?
With the practiced ease of a man who believes solar panels have the power to retroactively shut down mid-century industrial infrastructure, Tice entirely ignores the reality that aging European refineries closed because they could not compete with mega-facilities in Asia and the Middle East.
He furiously scolds the government for "allowing" private corporations to shut down unprofitable storage tanks, a natural consequence of the free-market capitalism he usually worships, while completely missing the irony that the UKโs dangerous vulnerability to a diesel crisis is the direct result of a prolonged, structural dependency on importing volatile fossil fuels from the global market rather than building domestic energy security.๐ฌ๐ง
Because Labour & Tories are obsessed with Net Stupid Zero so they allowed refineries to close, storage to close and assume the sun would always shine
Morons
So having completely cornered yourself with your ridiculous Holland example, you pivot predictably to a tired old denialist favourite: A chart that isn't showing that the climate is getting ๐ต๐ข๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ณ; itโs showing that humanity got ๐ณ๐ช๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ.
Early-warning radars, concrete infrastructure, modern medicine and global aid networks are what stopped people from dying in the millions from storms. None of that means the underlying weather events arenโt getting rapidly worse and more expensive.
But crack on with your climate science denialist cavalcade of busted memes!๐
So, Clintel wheels out Wheeler, who stares directly at the horrific reality of thousands of drowned and missing people in Nepal and somehow manages to conclude that the real victim here is the noble, long-suffering fossil fuel industry, which has been terribly misunderstood by people who are currently underwater.
She fearlessly deflects decades of global scientific consensus as if sheโs swatting a persistent wasp at a garden party, loudly declaring the climate compensation plea an absolute "scam" because the flood was immediately triggered by a failing chunk of glacial bedrock.
It is a spectacular performance, by a piece of writing so thoroughly unencumbered by anything resembling basic human sympathy, and so desperately eager to protect the balance sheets of multinational energy corporations that it achieves a kind of chaotic, farcical brilliance...
The flood in Nepal was a terrible disaster. Thousands have died or remain missing, and the country needs support.
But should that support be framed as climate compensation? Angela Wheeler, executive director of the @CO2Coalition, argues that the likely immediate cause was a failure of rock beneath a glacier, while a specific contribution from industrial COโ emissions to this flood has not been demonstrated.
In her opinion, Nepal would make a stronger appeal for help by asking for compassion, rather than demanding compensation from alleged โclimate sinnersโ. She calls for modern technology and better land use to protect people from future disasters.
' Electroverse' jubilantly tries to frame ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ถ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ as a fake-news factory, apparently oblivious to the fact that the outletโs headline, "๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ '๐๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด' ๐น๐ผ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐ณ๐ฒ", is a perfectly accurate summary of the ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ด๐ค๐ช๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ.
The post's claim that ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ถ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ reported the "opposite" of the data is an intense hallucination born from cherry-picking short-term, volatile population spikes caused by transient heatwaves, while ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐ช๐จ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ the study's primary conclusion. Oops.
๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ถ๐ข๐ณ๐ฅ๐ช๐ข๐ฏ correctly reported on the actual core of the ๐๐ข๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ฆ study: that when you look past seasonal noise at the long-term, multi-decadal data, ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ณ.๐ฎ% ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ฝ๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฌ.๐ญยฐ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ด. Smugly accusing a media outlet of lying because you failed to comprehend the difference between a temporary, chaotic spike and a systematic, long-term ecological collapse is a silly admission of ignorance.
The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a "staggering" collapse in marine life. But the study it cites actually shows the opposite.
When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls by around 15%.
That is the observed data.
To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modelled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline.
That decline is not observed, it is modelled.
The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide.
Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish.
The collapse exists only in the model and the headlines.
The Skeptic's customary monetised outrage, cramming a word-salad headline, performative sarcasm and a baffling conspiracy theory about RAF Typhoon jets magically hovering over thermometers to fake a 40.3ยฐC heat record.
The usual DS tosh, in other words.
It takes the nuanced scientific practice of worst-case risk modeling, flattens it into a cartoonish boogeyman, and then has the sheer audacity to hide this "suppressed truth" behind a premium Substack paywall. Ultimately, itโs less a decent climate critique and more a fever-dream rant where the only thing warming faster than the planet is the authorโs burning desire for your monthly subscription fee.
Five months after the IPCC ruled that the infamous RCP8.5 doomsday climate scenario was "implausible", the Met Office is still whipping up unjustified Net-Zero convenient fear, say Chris Morrison in the Climate Skeptic https://t.co/qTTvK210y7
Holland managed to keep a small, specific patch of coastal land dry by building dikes, windmills, and pumps over hundreds of years, Ray.
They had generations to adapt to baseline regional geography. Modern climate change is compressing massive ecological shifts into decades.
But, I forgot. You know what you're talking about, apparently.
@ClintelNED Complaining about wind turbine material ratios by using data that includes solar panels is like complaining about how heavy a bicycle is by weighing it while sitting inside a Honda Civic. Elite methodology right here.๐
@JamesMelville Yes, Brexit, a total overhaul of the UK's trading relationships, is apparently a ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ถ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ญ event with zero economic consequences.
@dorfman_p The US mid-terms are vitally important for the world, not just the US.
The sooner this mob can be stopped and the process of holding them to account can begin, the better.
Ray, there's a ๐ด๐ญ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐ฅ๐ช๐ง๐ง๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ between moving your tribe to a slightly less muddy cave 10,000 years ago and trying to "adapt" a globalised, industrialised urban/suburban civilisation of billions, built on fixed borders, huge coastal infrastructure and rigid agricultural zones.
You can't just pack up Tokyo or the entire state of Florida into a couple of Ikea bags because the weather got warm.๐
NEW โ Analysis: EVs are now nine times cheaper than petrol or diesel to drive in the UK
โ๏ธ Written by Molly Lempriere
๐ Data analysis by Ho Woo Nam
Read here: https://t.co/q8JzXJoZt8
Air conditioning relies on a stable, functional electrical grid. Relying on AC to survive global warming while ignoring the fact that rising temperatures strain power grids to the point of blackouts is a lethal oversight.
Assuming a vulnerable 85-year-old in a temperature-controlled American suburb represents the global reality is entirely inaccurate. A subsistence farmer in South Asia or Sub-Saharan Africa cannot simply turn up the AC when wet-bulb temperatures hit life threatening limits.
A drop in US Medicare spending does not mitigate global issues like crop failures, rising sea levels, migrating disease vectors or ecosystem collapses.
Intermediate scenarios are not a passive, natural outcome. They represent a future where the world takes significant action to cut emissions and curb warming. Celebrating the lower numbers in an intermediate scenario while actively fighting against the emissions reductions required to achieve them is entirely contradictory. But it's lucrative for climate science denialists, right?
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐: ๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ
Global warming will result in 2.5 million fewer elderly deaths over the next 50 years.
Cold already kills far more people than heat.
Mainstream outlets still push the heat death scare.
Read the full article:
https://t.co/MMxB5EGsQ8