@jordanbpeterson called it!
“Don’t be thinking Carney’s a new guy… all the evidence points to the fact that he’s gonna continue to pursue the net zero delusions that he’s already established as the center of his entire edifice of thought.”
“If you believe that carbon dioxide output on the part of Canada constitutes an existential threat of the sort that requires us to become poverty stricken over the next forty years… then Carney’s your guy.”
He said it straight. No sugar. No spin.
And look around.
Housing crisis. Record debt. Grocery bills crushing families. Young people giving up. Seniors choosing between meds and food. Trade pain. Broken promises.
This is the “utopian globalist environmentalist net zero catastrophe” he warned about.
Peterson saw the resume, read the book, and told you exactly who this man is.
Canada is living the consequences right now.
Watch this. Share it. Tag the people still pretending this is competence.
#cdnpoli #Carney #JordanPeterson #NetZero #CanadaFirst
‼️BREAKING: Doug Ford TURNS on Mark Carney.
Says the Feds are "gouging people to death on taxes"
Let me tell you something...
Doug Ford is MASTER at reading the polls. He's seeing something here.
The entire Canadian media whose biggest funding source is the Canadian government is pumping Carney’s tires. They don’t dare say a bad word about him.
Tax payer dollars being used to fund a media is clearly not a good thing for Canadians. Someday we’ll all wake up in a tent and understand that.
@FoodProfessor Carney and his crew have the sort of control over the media that would make North Korea blush.
Example: CBC alone is fed $1.4 billion . Then there is the Canadian Media Fund of $154 m and another $249 m for the online news act and $19 m for the local news.
And so on…
Shameful.
@FoodProfessor The polls are bullshit, but Canada is now in the grip
Of a totalitarian regime with a dictator that controls every aspect of the country, including the 24/7 MSM propaganda.
While U.K.'s PM Starmer is facing growing pressure to resign amid a sluggish U.K. economy, PM Carney’s popularity is at a record high — despite Canada arguably being in worse shape on several key metrics, including unemployment, productivity, private-sector growth, and food inflation.
Wonder why...
This is COMPLETE BS
They formed a panel to say that Pierre Poilievre will never be Prime Minister of Canada
It’s time for him to step down.
This coming from the LEFT.
If he’s never going to WIN why do they want him to step down so BADLY?
Trump has approved permits for the 500,000 BPD Bridger pipeline, moving crude oil from Alberta through Montana to Wyoming.
If the US can open doors for Alberta energy while Canada keeps closing them, it’s another reason for Alberta to become independent and control own future.
Please explain to me how Mark Carney is all for Canada??? When an American firm employing Mark Carney's wife received huge contracts from the Government of Canada....What will it take for Canadians to open up their eyes to this corruption?
Marilyn Gladu @MarilynGladuSL Caught In Potential Criminal Bribery Scandal Over Floor Crossing Pork For Projects
https://t.co/vUsOinWWxu
Marilyn Gladu crossed the floor from the Conservative Party to the Liberal caucus on April 8, 2026. This move brought Prime Minister Mark Carney one seat closer to a functional majority in the House of Commons. Hours after the announcement, Gladu told a local reporter in Sarnia that she had received a call from the office of the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure. The purpose of the call was to discuss all the things the riding of Sarnia Lambton Bkejwanong needed. She stated that her previous requests for funding had gone nowhere while she remained on the opposition benches. She sent a one page list of projects to the minister after her 2025 re election. Those projects aligned with his file but produced no results until she switched parties.
Section 119 of the Criminal Code of Canada addresses bribery of judicial officers and others, including members of Parliament. The law states that every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years, who being the holder of a judicial office or being a member of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by them in their official capacity. The same section also makes it an offence for anyone who directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to such a person or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment in respect of anything done or omitted or to be done or omitted by that person in their official capacity.
In this situation, the timing raises serious questions under the law. Gladu herself connected the lack of progress on her riding projects to her status as an opposition member. She noted that it is harder to get funding when not on the government benches. She observed that after she crossed the floor, the call from the ministers office arrived immediately. Federal funding for infrastructure, housing and local projects qualifies as valuable consideration that benefits the riding and the member politically. If the prospect or promise of accelerated access to such funds influenced her decision to change her official capacity from opposition critic to government supporter, then the elements of corrupt acceptance or offering could apply. The key legal term is corruptly, which courts assess based on all surrounding circumstances, including public statements and the direct link between party switch and funding discussions.
Cabinet denied any pork barreling when opposition members raised the issue in the House of Commons. Gladu later described the floor crossing as the best thing for her riding, for the country and for herself during the Liberal national convention. She had previously supported calls for mandatory byelections when members switch parties. Local reaction in the historically Conservative riding of Sarnia Lambton Bkejwanong included protests outside her constituency office and public expressions of betrayal. The Sarnia mayor urged a byelection to let voters decide. Gladu maintained that no explicit offer was made but her own words tied improved government support directly to her new status on the government side.
This case fits a pattern where discretionary federal funding programs give ministers significant leeway. Such programs can appear to reward political alignment rather than follow strict merit based criteria. Data on past infrastructure allocations has shown variations in how funds flow to government held ridings versus opposition ones across different administrations. While governments defend targeted spending as legitimate constituent service, the optics of a swift ministerial call right after a defection fuel public suspicion. Few prosecutions under section 119 have targeted members of Parliament for matters involving pork barreling. Most similar controversies end in political debate, ethics reviews or Auditor General findings rather than criminal charges. The threshold for proving corrupt intent remains high and requires evidence such as internal communications or clear conditional promises.
The Gladu situation highlights how concentrated power over billions in discretionary spending invites questions about accountability. Her constituents and the broader public deserve full disclosure of all communications between her office and the ministers office regarding projects before and after April 8, 2026. An independent review or formal complaint to authorities could examine whether the facts meet the legal test under section 119. Without such scrutiny, trust in the system continues to erode regardless of which party holds power.
CARNEY DEFIES ETHICS COMMITTEE
Carney has repeatedly met with Brookfield executives despite his VAST conflicts.
He stands to make MILLIONS from the Brookfield funds HE SET UP.
The Ethics Committee is clear: HE MUST DIVEST.
His REFUSAL says everything you need to know.
WATCH: Liberal Minister CONFIRMS his plan to regulate what Canadians can say on social media.
He cites the UK’s censorship regime as an example that Canada should follow.
Do you trust the Liberals to decide what you can say online?
Carney tries explaining how his "sovereign wealth fund" will generate business, despite putting taxpayers on the hook for billions.
"It's a new way of building," he says, comparing it to past historic projects like the St. Lawrence Seaway and the Canadian Pacific railroad.
Diab just told @rhondaforoshawa that she DIDNT KNOW THE NAME of the high profile member of a listed terrorist org for who she granted (and yes, it was her) a special permit to come to Canada.
Then she laughed.
This is who Carney put in charge of Canada's immigration system.