@JonasGo79890629@Joe4Jersey@Tezzathekchen Study the history of the sport and you will find that tennis players peak in their early to mid twenties and start declining from 27 onward.
@fivepointscap I am bullish $UBER - have been extremely impressed with management and their execution over the last few years. Its about a 7% position for me. Having said this I sold some this morning though in order to buy the $META dip!
@DrewCohenMoney@themattharbaugh You should really consider adapting these in depth videos for the podcast format. Much easier format in which to digest long form content than you tube.
@DavidHa04461705@wey_know @A2467811 Of course he won most of his slams prior to Djokovic's peak - he's 6 years older and not even of the same generation?! You are wrong - Djokovic played in both the 2017 and 2018 Aust Open and 2017 Wimbledon - all of which Federer won. you don't know what you are talking about.
@DavidHa04461705@wey_know @A2467811 What you are saying makes no sense nd is not supported by the numbers. Djokovic didn't even have a positive H2H against Federer until Federer was 34.
@DavidHa04461705@wey_know @A2467811 12 slams in his 20's isnt good enough - its equal with Sampras and less than Nadal(13) and Federer(16). In his peak years Federer spent 237 consecutive weeks at No.1, 5 consecutive Wimbledon's, 5 consecutive US Opens, 3 Aust Opens - thats what dominating in your prime looks like.
@DavidHa04461705@wey_know @A2467811 Federer won the bulk of his slams between 21 and 27 which if you bothered to study the history of the sport would know is the norm. The stats clearly show that throughout the open era tennis players decline from 27 onward. That is not even up for contention.