@SamGreenwoodRIO@ProdigyXII Exactly this, your second point. I dont see a world where Chewy does not put the last 40k in with a hand that beats Kyte on the river (especially on this sickest blank 3 where he never improves). So Kyte really probably has close to 50% on the river, sick as it may be lol.
@tombos21@AjayChabra88 Could make sense in a vacuum, but if you are known to do this, what does it say to your opponents when you do not openfold and instead check?
@barnyboatman@tombos21 As a supercomputer myself, you are too easy to read. I will see your bluff and will raise you with an extra emtpy box nr 2 you filthy liar.
@IbukiLazuli@My1xT@danliu Lol with your logig it would not be deceptive if it said 50, 90, 99 or even 100% off on orders over $70, just so long as the fine print at the bottom says ”up to 15 dollars”?
@IAmTheKos@tjreidpoker@krissyb24poker The irony of your statement is that if you flatten payouts, there is more ICM pressure to make big folds, not less. If for example it was the most extreme top heavy version of winner takes all, there would be 0 ICM and you would never make ”tight ICM folds”.
@bencb789@Joeingram1@padspoker Does this mean you would not jam anything? Maybe only AK/KK? Do you see this as a problem post flop vs a capable player like Kenny, to have such a capped flatting range (basically only flatting TT/JJ/QQ and nothing much more)?
@CoeusCap För när vi kikat och sett att det är 600kr i kuvertet, så vet vi ju att det är 1200 eller 300 i det andra. Och för att EVt inte ska bli positivt av att byta, så måste det ju vara något annat än 50% chans att dra 1200? Någonstans här börjar allt bli snurrigt och paradoxalt 😅
@CoeusCap Vidare så KAN det inte göra någon skillnad för EV:t bara för att man kikar ner i det första kuvertet.
Med allt detta sagt så kan jag ändå inte helt klart och tydligt motbevisa logiken helt i detta:
https://t.co/Fzns2vsqFp