We'd like to inform everyone that, sadly, we have to stop supporting Snax #blockchain in its current state. #EOS engine and its ecosystem are not progressing and we should review #Snax model to migrate it to #Ethereum or its sidechain.
Please notice, that we took a snapshot of the latest blockchain state and that's what https://t.co/rEyxOQzBSB website is showing now. However, blockchain transactions are not available.
We'd like to inform everyone that, sadly, we have to stop supporting Snax #blockchain in its current state. #EOS engine and its ecosystem are not progressing and we should review #Snax model to migrate it to #Ethereum or its sidechain.
We thank everyone who supported Snax chain!๐
We don't lose the hope and will try to offer some scalable and fair model that each content creator could benefit from. That was always the mission of Snax and we will follow it!
@miklindq If binding does not work in your case, it does not mean, that blockchain doesn't work.
Please, provide a screenshot of an error, which you got during the binding process, to `binding-issue` channel in our Discord. And also your Snax account name, which you try to create.
2. Unfortunately, we are forced to suspend rewards for #Twitter accountsโน๏ธ
Infrastructure to analyze the whole Twitter is too expensive for us right now. However, Twitter #PublisherRewards can be renewed in any time later. #SocialTransactions work for Twitter as usual.
@crypchart @SamsungMobile It could be fixed, like in #Snax#blockchain. Snax has a progressive cost function of $NET and $CPU, which allows the user to send transactions at a lower cost, if their total transaction amount is small.
We did it, because we were focused on average user's experience.
@stellabelle@rektkid_@ramijames@HelloTelos @europechain_ @BrendanBlumer@bytemaster7 It could be fixed, like in #Snax#blockchain. Snax has a progressive cost function of $NET and $CPU, which allows the user to send transactions at a lower cost, if their total transaction amount is small.
We did it, because we were focused on average user's experience.
@ryancharleston @BonzManifest @tokenstate @finchify @crypto_iwad It could be fixed, like in #Snax#blockchain. Snax has a progressive cost function of $NET and $CPU, which allows the user to send transactions at a lower cost, if their total transaction amount is small.
We did it, because we were focused on average user's experience.
@MeetDotOne@ColinTCrypto @finchify It can be fixed, like in #Snax#blockchain. Snax has a progressive cost function of $NET and $CPU, which allows the user to send transactions at a lower cost, if their total transaction amount is small.
We did it, because we were focused on average user's experience.
๐กFortunately, in #Snax we rewrote the function, which is forming the $NET and $CPU price. Snax has a progressive function, which allows the user to send transactions at a lower cost, if their total transaction amount is small.
#EIDOS#attack#EOS#blockchain
๐จโ๐ง Developers of @SteemNetwork fixed the issue pretty fast (good job, guys ๐), so we've resumed #Steem rewards today: the Scoring Round is already in progress.
โก๏ธ#Steem software has trouble again and Steem rewards are halted. We sent an issue to developers and will wait for solving to resume the Scoring Rounds.