@RyanNic35365459@philmupp1 I understand that and historically it is too deep in the actions of cruel actions. But separately weigh up the disgusting actions by Israel.
@RyanNic35365459@philmupp1 International Court of Justice (ICJ): In January 2024, the ICJ issued provisional measures finding South Africa’s claims of genocide "plausible" and ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts, though it did not issue a final ruling on whether genocide is occurring.
@RyanNic35365459@philmupp1 Scholarly Consensus: The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) passed a resolution in September 2025 stating that Israel’s actions meet the legal definition of genocide under the 1948 UN Convention, a view supported by many genocide and international law experts.
@RyanNic35365459@philmupp1 UN Commission Findings: In September 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israeli authorities committed genocide in Gaza, citing genocidal intent and acts including mass killings, starvation, and the destruction of healthcare and education systems.
@RyanNic35365459@philmupp1 Indeed the second intifada was vile and any war atrocities are never justified. But if you think average citizens who support the Palestinian people are calling for a killing of a race, you are more deluded than the dirt you throw on the so-called woke left.
@TrevorS553610@RhondaGarad The claim that Palestinians are not indigenous to their homeland or that Palestine was a "land without a people" is widely considered a myth by historians and scholars who argue it serves as a Terra Nullius justification for settler colonialism.
@TrevorS553610@RhondaGarad You don't need to educate me, despite thinking you are an academic. Firstly any war atrocities are unacceptable and yes, most definitely the second intifada was a series of vile acts by Hamas, by the meaning conveyed by most is not a call to massacre people. No war is one sided.
@TrevorS553610@RhondaGarad that would include Palestinians, Jews and Christians. This would mean the elimination of the state of Israel, but not the Jewish people.
@TrevorS553610@RhondaGarad The phrase was first used around 1964 by the newly formed Palestine Liberation Organisation to advocate for a unitary Palestinian state along the borders of “Mandatory Palestine” – the administrative territory ruled by the British from 1920–48 ,
@Lena178159@philmupp1@grok I wouldn't call her a rape apologist given her life history. Both sides have produced fake statements and accusations and whilst dismissing them isn't helpful, Zionists on the scale of atrocities are way above in this particular conflict.
@MarkHope__1@peacenicsta@TheKnownLover Start by reading this: https://t.co/cdyXq7jdPy and also any extreme part of any culture is vile, it's like saying all Palestine people are pro Hamas. The picture you paint is inaccurate, both sides in this conflict have committed atrocities, but the heavier toll is one sided
@Lena178159@philmupp1 No she didn't, read a book, it's a call for international civil disobedience, boycotts, and global pressure to end the occupation and support Palestinian self-determination. They view it as a rallying cry for human rights rather than a call for physical harm.