Concerns regarding Delhi SIR
Dear @CeodelhiOffice
We examined the deleted voters list (ASDD list) for 3 polling stations in Delhi after the first phase of the SIR, and found the following problems:
1. ASDD list does not mention the addresses of the deleted voters, making any public scrutiny extremely difficult.
2. To access the addresses of deleted voters, one has to look for their entry in the old voter list. The ASDD list states the part number and serial number of the old list. However, it does not specify which list (there are 4 lists on the ECI portal for 2025) and the link to access it.
3. There is a serious error when trying to access the old voter list- the polling station numbers and names have been completely mixed up. For instance, if you search for the voter list of Jagdamba Camp, you get “part number and name: 122-Jagdamba Camp”, but when you download the list, it is actually the voter list of GK- II. One has to download the list which is titled “96-Chirag Delhi” which opens the list of “96-Jagdamba Camp”!
4. The Delhi CEO has placed the minutes of the meetings of BLO-BLAs of each polling station in the public domain, which is a very welcome step. However, in several cases, the reason for deletion in the minutes does not match the reason given in the ASDD list. All the voters classified under ‘EF Refused’ (Enrollment Form Refused) in the minutes of meeting of polling station 96 of Assembly Constituency 50 are classified as ‘Untraceable/Absent’ in the ASDD lists. For instance, for a voter- Ram Sevak, in the minutes, the reason for deletion is recorded as ‘EF Refused’ (Enrollment Form Refused) but in the ASDD list for his polling station, the reason is ‘Untraceable/Absent’. These appear contradictory- was the person present and refused the enumeration form OR was he Untraceable/Absent.
5. Aadhaar has been made mandatory for anyone who wants to challenge their deletion. The ASDD list states on top- “Dissatisfied persons can submit their claim along with a copy of their Aadhaar card.”
-Anjali Bhardwaj & Amrita Johri
देश में लोकतंत्र की डकैती चल रही है।
लोकसभा चुनाव 2024 में वोट चोरी आयोग ने वोटर टर्न आउट की वास्तविक संख्या दी ही नहीं जो फॉर्म 17-C में लिखी जाती है। वोटर टर्न आउट परसेंटेज में दिया और बाद में इसमें 8%, 15% से लेकर 30% तक बढ़ोत्तरी हो गई। जिस फॉर्म 17-C से वोटिंग की निष्पक्षता तय होती थी, मोदी-ज्ञानेश की जोड़ी ने उसे ही नष्ट कर दिया।
पार्टियों ने जितनी सूचनाएं मांगी, आयोग ने देने से मना कर दिया। हरियाणा में कोर्ट ने आदेश दिया कि सूचनाएं दी जाएं तो चोर सरकार ने नियम ही बदल दिया कि सूचनाएं नहीं देंगे। आयोग न डिजिटल वोटर लिस्ट देता है, न वीडियो देता है, न फॉर्म 17 सी में पारदर्शिता रखता है।
(ये वीडियो सितंबर 2025 का है।)
First The Indian Express. Now The Economic Times drops another bombshell.
The cracks within the Election Commission are no longer whispers, they are rather becoming headlines.
The annual revision of electoral rolls is reportedly stalled, potentially keeping thousands of newly eligible 18 year olds waiting to enter the electoral roll.
We, as a nation, have a serious institutional question before us!
https://t.co/8wpsRnFHvP
Lawyers’ Association for Constitution writes to CJI Surya Kant raising concerns over the “out-of-turn” listing of a plea arising from strictures against the Noida District Magistrate and the muting of live proceedings during its hearing
The letter flags that the petitioner, a public servant, is the daughter of the Chief Election Commissioner of India and alleges that the matter was specially assigned to a particular Bench despite the prevailing roster
@MedhaRoopam #SupremeCourt
This is the most important video you need to watch today.
Kudos to @Saurabh_Unmute for bringing out the “dead” before the nation. Gyanesh Kumar’s crimes, at the behest of those in power, has to be accounted for. Time’s up, Gyanesh bro!
@Cockroachisback
Sudhir ji, this is nothing. You will be taken to cleaners soonest. You have intoxicated our beautiful nation with so much hate.
Your time is up. Mark my words. @sudhirchaudhary
इंडियन एक्सप्रेस के लिए @RitikaChopra__ की ऐसी स्टोरी जिसने मुख्य चुनाव आयुक्त के ‘मनमानेपन’ की कलई खोल कर रख दी है! इसके बाद तो उनको पद पर बन रहने का कोई नैतिक हक़ ही नहीं है!
We spent months investigating the inner working of the EC.
What we found: the majority of the Commission, kept in the dark for almost a year.
Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi objected on record at least 14 times in 10 months, FOUR times on a single day, to decisions taken in the Commission's name without their knowledge.
Here is what they flagged:
(3/10)
https://t.co/LuOZBDxKt8
The Election Commission is three people, not ONE: a Chief and two Election Commissioners, equal in rank.
By law they decide together. Unanimously if they can, by majority if they can't. Two of three is a majority.
(2/10)
The Election Commission of India is under fire like never before.
The SIR has struck 13 crore names off draft rolls, putting the EC at the centre of intense public debate over its role in deciding who gets to vote — and who doesn’t.
HOWEVER, what nobody knew: through that same period, some of the sharpest questions were being asked from inside.
Out today, after months of work. Our #ExpressInvestigation 🧵
(1/10)