Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.
- Isaac Asimov
@JustLuai I occasionally wonder whether the outsized effort and patience and constant disappointment trying to explain and reason with people blinded by whatever it is, is worth it.
And then you remind us that sometimes it is. Maybe that's enough.
Thank you.
@fbmarc@peterrhague In terms of ROI, science+academia are a govt jobs program on par with SLS. It'd be far easier to go back to direct patronage, and leave science to people who'd put their own money at stake. Of course, they'd also reap most of the rewards.
P. S. Asimov was way ahead of you...
@planefag Waaaaaait....
Does this mean Helion and TAE are dead in the water? They don't appear to be. What does your twitter person actually know?
I've been tracking fusion start ups for 20 years, and these two haven't been declared dead yet!
@TheWizardTower Well put.
The real problem with the red/blue framing is the unrealistic choice collapse. Very useful as a philosophical discussion topic, but utterly impractical. Just like socialism.
@VictorTaelin Why doesn't option 2 work in practice - on the response -since that's what you end up doing manually? If the output is expensive on time/tokens, then detailed thinking and augmenting/redirecting it is the solution IMO
@planefag@miyaman77@AiPinfu2003 I wonder about the social dynamics in Japan... If "reading the atmosphere" is so important, then whoever doesn't is the authority. And is in a way, being explicitly granted that authority. Does that seem right?
@hahussain Lemme try:
No more aid to idiots!
Write to your local representative to demand they.... fire themselves?! Ohhh
* Statistically speaking. No specific claims implied. If you're insulted, have a conversation with the mirror.
@planefag While commendable, this is also quite exceptional. Somebody with less justified confidence can cause more harm than good in such a situation.
Basically he had the luck to be the right guy in the right place. Not a small thing, but uncommon probably.
> beliefs matter. If your beliefs are this consequential, you’d better be sure they are right.
Have I found the angle on "strong opinions, weakly held" that I actually like? I think so... And the added bonus is it's quantifiable!
If you think killing and eating shrimp is morally equivalent to the holocaust, then you are a bad person if you don’t use everything in your means to stop it.
The difference between “animal welfare matters” and “animal suffering is morally equivalent to human suffering” is a difference in kind, not just degree.
This is why people are pointing to doomer rhetoric as “extreme”. But I disagree with them, because I don’t think doomers are saying “we’re all going to die” because it’s inflammatory, I think they actually believe this is a frighteningly possible outcome. Therefore, it’s morally incumbent on them to speak plainly.
However, the highly predictable result (and indeed, logical, depending on which other premises you hold or do not hold) is that someone will attempt to kill or maim developers of AI.
So doomers are stuck with two bad options. Either downplay the risk, in the hopes of preventing another attack. Or, speak truthfully. But the cost of that is what it is, the risk of violence is real. The blood isn’t—I repeat—isn’t—on their hands. But they are weakening the foundation of something. If it shatters, in one individual or many, they can’t pretend they had nothing to do with it, and frankly it is deeply discrediting to try.
This is where I take out my old dead beating horse: beliefs matter. If your beliefs are this consequential, you’d better be sure they are right.