@punishablepress How could all those people look on and do absolutely nothing? No calls for 911. No support to a dying woman. Just standing and looking. This is sad and utterly horrifying in ways it shouldn’t be horrifying!
#BREAKING In a world where online platforms have become critical for the distribution and consumption of news, the Canadian government has made a perplexing move. The recently passed Bill C-18, also known as the Online News Act, requires Google to pay for merely displaying links to news content. Google's response? They've announced they will remove links to Canadian news from their Search, News, and Discover products once the law takes effect.
Why does this matter? Well, first, let's examine the nature of the internet and the way we consume news. Online platforms like Google have democratized access to information, breaking down barriers and providing a global platform for news publishers to reach audiences they never could before. By requiring payment for links, Bill C-18 undermines this fundamental principle.
The Canadian government, led by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, seems to have overlooked the fact that these links, which they now want to tax, serve as gateways to the news sites themselves. Google, or any other search engine for that matter, does not host the news; it simply points users in the right direction. Now, if those directions are removed, how are users supposed to find their way?
What's more, the notion of a "link tax" exposes Google to uncapped financial liability. This isn't just a business concern; it's a dangerous precedent. If governments can impose fees on the facilitation of information access, what's to stop them from extending this principle to other areas?
Rodriguez and the Liberal government claim that this bill is meant to support Canadian journalism. However, what we see is a government caving into the pressures of the news lobby, rather than considering the wider implications for its citizens. In this digital age, Canadian users have become accustomed to the ease of finding news through platforms like Google. Removing that capability does not support journalism; it creates barriers.
We need to question the competency of a government that views the throttling of information access as a win for its people. Sure, the news industry has faced challenges with the rise of digital media, but the answer is not to cling to outdated models and penalize innovation. Rather, it's to adapt and evolve.
Bill C-18 is not just a misstep; it's a step backward. Instead of fostering a more connected Canada, this legislation risks leaving Canadians in the dark. That's a loss for everyone. The government needs to reconsider its approach, for the sake of its citizens and the future of news consumption in Canada.
#cdnpoli
https://t.co/QNY1ycfap3
@JustinTrudeau That should have been a period, not a comma, after, “…her lifetime of service.”
Textbook example of how to be a narcissist. Make the Queen’s death about something you did, instead of just about her.
@seerutkchawla Those men are people, who are choosing to take their own lives and leave loved ones behind. This is a tragedy and the women cheering them on are disgusting human being who should be ashamed of themselves. I’ve lost too many men in my life from suicide to ever be OK with this.
Trudeau says he still needs the extraordinary powers of the Emergencies Act because there could be more blockades. Not only was there no emergency, but the Act must be used to deal with *existing* ones, not potential future ones. Another proof it’s a power grab.
Remember when Twitter banned anyone sharing the New York Post's Hunter Biden laptop story because of its "hacked materials" policy? Odd that no one seems to mind journalists tweeting about donors to the Freedom Convoy – information they have because of hacked materials.
This needs to be spoken about. This needs to be shared. What Trudeau is doing is highly illegal, let alone unethical.
#EmergenciesAct#CanadaEmergency#Trudeau
The federal government has not met the threshold necessary to invoke the Emergencies Act. This law creates a high and clear standard for good reason: the Act allows government to bypass ordinary democratic processes. This standard has not been met. 1/3