#TriveniHomeBuyers बसाने बजाय उजाड़ना निंदनीय कार्य, भ्रष्ट बिल्डरों/सरकारी अधिकारियों के मिलीभगत से घर-खरीदारों को लूटा जारहा है। लाइसेंस 34 36 2007 पर पुनर्विचार व 22/12/2022 को सुनवाई क्यों?@cmohry@PMOIndia हमसे खिलवाड़ रोकिए, आपकी अनदेखी से पूरा देश चिंतित। @DrAkhilMahajan1
*Faridabad: शासन-प्रशासन में बिल्डर माफिया और अधिकारियों के गठजोड़ की पोल खोलती कहानी देखें भुगतभोगी डॉक्टर की जुबानी
https://t.co/KnzHZcr4TB
*If Link/News will not open
*Pl save the Number & Click the Blue Link @DrAkhilMahajan1@narendramodi@PMOIndia@cmohry@KPGBJP
@sona_bindra063@dtcphry@cmohry True madam both offices of TCS playing with home buyers .Home buyers are thrown out of office .i was asked to go out of room .i was made to feel as if i am comission agent .might is right in this office .ias in this country are arrogant .u can talk them .colonial mindset .
@cmohry kindly investigate licence number 34 36 2007 no stay on this licence supreme court decided edc issue .collusion of both acs dtcp rera office .playing hide & seek by recall stay of their own orders after change of guard .one gives order other stays and same with rera
@DrAkhilMahajan1@cmohry@dtcphry Us homebuyers need justice. We have suffered for over 12 years! Promoter siphoned hard earned life savings and there is no action . Shameful
When we have top notch officials at DGTCP, Haryana who are more concerned in safeguarding interest of developlers & licensee and not the commoner like homebuyers, it's only Courts and activist like @DrAkhilMahajan1 are hope for us homebuyers.
See hearing ordered without any provisions of la .throwing all parameters to wind .Rera counsel could not place on record reason for calling hearing .end result .notice of motion issued.defects in law as one organ of state suports another organ.Home buyers at last pedstal .sad
@cmohry@dtcphry i am astonished that new Dtcp says He is not bothered about homebuyers& They are not bothered about Rera.Funny thing Rera dont have powers to issue directions to govt.issue already decided are being reheard.inspite of affidavit in highcourt sc.God bless them
@AdvMamtaSharma@RattooTotaBy100@LiveLawIndia@cbseindia29 Mam, d issue is dat d marks gvn were not as per d students deserved. School's previous years performance should hv nt been considered while calculating d marks rather student's past perfrmance should have been considered. What if the students hv changed d school in 11th std?