sonnyboy2able

[Leila de Lima @manayleila]

From the bottom of my heart, THANK YOU SO MUCH. You made my special day really beautiful. 💞🥰

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@BatmanTweetzz @grok Which ai is from china among claude chatgpt gemeni or grok

[The King @arthurXadvocate]

If you want this destabiliser investigated, arrested where warranted by law at the soonest time, and charged with the appropriate offenses, please like and repost.

Let us call upon the government and the competent authorities to enforce our accountability mechanisms with urgency, impartiality, and resolve—without fear or favour against those who continuously undermine our institutions, sow division and disorder, and seek to wrest power from a legitimately elected President.

Their actions have become increasingly clear. He arrogated unto himself powers and authority that were never his to exercise. He worked in concert with a purported Blue Ribbon Committee that lacked the proper authority of the Senate, in an attempt to bastardise established institutions and lawful processes. They came dangerously close to succeeding once again.

We condemn, in the strongest possible terms, this serial destabiliser, his network of corrupt political allies, and their 18 delivery syndicates.

We likewise condemn the Cayetano group of opportunistic politicians whose overriding objective is the acquisition of power, the preservation of impunity, and the protection of personal and political interests at the expense of institutional integrity and the rule of law.

[Cleve V. Arguelles @CleveArguelles]

This is the missing video. Was previously uploaded here on Twitter. https://t.co/N4l1PE6qdx

[Julian Miguel @iamJulianMiguel]

I read the Solicitor General's supreme court response against Bato Dela Rosa and I encourage you to check it out. It is very well written and passionately constitutional. Beow are some verbatim excerpts.

[UNIQLO_Sports @UQAmb_Sports]

📢GIVEAWAY!
Roger Federer's autographed DRY-EX Polo Shirt Giveaway!
This is a special giveaway for a chance to win Roger Federer's autographed DRY-EX Polo Shirt.

[How to Apply]
1. Follow @UQAmbassadors
2. Repost this post

[Application Period]
10:00 AM April 1, 2026 (Wed) ～ 9:59 AM April 8, 2026 (Wed) JST

Check @UQAmbassadors profile link for terms and conditions.
Good luck!

ロジャー・フェデラー選手直筆サイン入りドライEXポロシャツが当たるキャンペーン！
たくさんのご応募お待ちしています！

参加方法：
1. @UQAmbassadors をフォロー
2. 応募期間内に本投稿をリポスト

応募期間：
2026年4月1日(水)10:00 ～ 2026年4月8日(水) 09:59　日本時間

※当選者はInstagramとXのキャンペーン合わせて4名当選となります。
※@UQAmbassadors のプロフィールリンクから応募要項をご確認ください。
たくさんのご応募をお待ちしております！

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@QCMayorJoy Mayor Joy ipagbawal na po ninyo ang mga inuman sa kalye, nakakabulahaw na sound system, maingay na tambutso ng motorsiklo, walang habas na paputok. Kaming mga senior citizens, mga may sakit at mga babies ng neighbors, at furbabies pet ay sobrang disturbed talaga.

[Joketerte @joketerte30]

Markolekta, ambaho ng bibig! I complaint nyo sa committee of ethics minura kayo sa live, kakahiya!

[🇵🇭 Laitera🇵🇭 @laiteranidaddy]

Wag ganon Marcoleta pikon ka masyado e . Wag ka na nagpapainterview kung sasagot ka na lang mantatanga ka pa on air 😒 kasalanan ba nila na may conflict of interest kayo ng pamilya mo dyan kala discaya ?

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@InternetH0F grok how can I order this?

[Facts & Politics @FACTmebaby]

READ!!! READ!!! READ!!! 🚨🚨

THE ULTIMATE CALL FROM FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE REYNATO PUNO

OFFICIAL STATEMENT
PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION (PhilConsa)

On the Supreme Court Ruling in G.R. No. 278353 “Sara Z. Duterte vs. House of Representatives, et al.”
July 30, 2025

The Philippine Constitution Association (PhilConsa) expresses its serious concern over the Supreme Court’s ruling in G.R. No. 278353, which nullified the impeachment proceedings initiated by the House of Representatives against Vice President Sara Z. Duterte. With due respect to the Honorable Court, we believe this decision overreaches constitutional boundaries, disrupts the separation of powers, and weakens Congress’ exclusive authority to hold impeachable officers accountable.

⸻

The Facts Cannot Be Ignored

Between December 2024 and February 2025, four impeachment complaints were filed against Vice President Duterte. The first three complaints, though officially docketed, were never pursued. They were neither found sufficient in form and substance nor referred for committee hearings. On February 5, 2025, a fourth complaint—this time endorsed by 215 members of the House, more than the required one-third—was transmitted as Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, in full accordance with the Constitution.

Yet on July 25, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled that the fourth complaint was barred under the one-year rule in Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution, on the theory that the filing of earlier complaints—even if not acted upon—already “initiated” the impeachment process.

⸻

This Interpretation Is Constitutionally Flawed

PhilConsa respectfully but firmly disagrees with this interpretation. The one-year bar rule was designed to prevent harassment through repeated impeachment proceedings—not to protect impeachable officers from ever facing trial by allowing them to take cover behind mere filings. As the Court itself held in Francisco v. House of Representatives, impeachment is only deemed initiated after the complaint is found sufficient in form and substance and referred to the Committee on Justice. The earlier complaints never reached that stage. To treat them as having “initiated” proceedings defies both logic and constitutional intent.

This ruling invites dangerous abuse. It opens the door for impeachable officials—or their allies—to deliberately file weak or premature complaints to “consume” the one-year window and block any real effort at accountability. This is not a safeguard against harassment—it is a blueprint for evasion.

⸻

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

This case called for judicial restraint, not judicial activism. The Constitution gave the House of Representatives the sole power to initiate impeachment and the Senate the sole power to try and decide it. These are textual, exclusive powers, and the Judiciary’s role in such matters should be limited to clear, grave abuses that nullify constitutional norms.

Instead, the Court stepped into the heart of a political process already underway—substituting its own judgment for that of a constitutional majority of the House. It interpreted the one-year bar so broadly that it now disables the very mechanism of impeachment in all but the rarest cases.

This ruling, though perhaps well-intentioned, is a clear instance of judicial activism. It turns the Judiciary from a neutral guardian of the Constitution into an arbiter of congressional timing and internal processes—matters the Constitution never assigned to the courts.

Judicial activism, if unchecked, becomes judicial supremacy. And that supremacy can, over time, paralyze the political departments that the people themselves empowered.

⸻see comment for cont. 👇🏻

[DAVAOMIGRANT @nabunturanguy]

I’m glad @imchristan is running for a political post. And a very grounded guy, starting as a councilor! I hope he wins. Maswerte ang mga taga District 1 ng Mandaluyong if he wins.

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@PhCHED Please look into Bestlink College of the Philippines viral ngayon field trip for their foundation day sa Bataan. Ang baba nga ng tuition fee pero ang daming ibang fees tulad ng field trip. Di kaya ganito ito ang paraan nila para mabawi yung mababang tuition fee?

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@QCMayorJoy Mayor Joy pakiusap naman yung Commonwealth Ave Litex area problematic ang mga vendors dian. Sikip ng kalsada at traffic. Lalo na noong holidays laking perwisyu

[Antonya @antonya2014]

@QCMayorJoy Ma’am, yung Commonwealth Avenue pakitanggal na po ng mga tiangge lalo na sa bandang Litex. Dala-dalawa na po ang palengke magkabilaan, kaya the tiangges are very unnecessary. Please dedicate those areas to pedestrians para sa safety nila at para lumuwag luwag ang traffic.

[Gowen Geter @kupsgeter]

@QCMayorJoy Sana silipin din ni mayora ang commonwealth avenue litex area kung saan pinayagan ng local government na maglagay ng pwesto ang mga ambulant vendors sa KALSADA. Kung gusto mag-hanapbuhay ay umupa sa legit commercial spaces at maghanapbuhay ng patas.

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@ABSCBNNews @JohnsonManabat @QCMayorJoy taon taon pong problema yan taon taon din kaming nagrereklamo sa lgu ng QC walang nangyayari parang awa nio na iilang vendors na walang disiplina na pinagbibigyan ninyo million ang piniperwisyo na dumadaan araw araw sa Commonwealth Ave.

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@TheRichFromCali No

[sonnyboy2able @sonnyboy2able]

@SweetCarmel77 @CalltoActivism Kamala wasn't fact checked on non answers