@GodlyNations Whatever one’s politics, stepping behind the White House podium at such a young age—while raising a family—and handling relentless national and international scrutiny requires confidence, discipline, and resilience.
👍
A More Complete Chain of the Problem:
State-directed allocation of resources
↓
SOE dominance in key upstream sectors
↓
Local-government investment incentives and overcapacity
↓
Weak household demand
↓
Large numbers of private businesses competing for limited demand
↓
Price wars and destructive “involution”
↓
Profit margins squeezed to the extreme
↓
Some businesses look for cost-cutting shortcuts in quality, logistics, and safety
↓
Weak enforcement, insufficient independent media scrutiny, and inadequate penalties for violations
↓
Bad actors undercut responsible businesses — “bad money drives out good”
↓
Food-safety scandals and other quality problems
↓
Further erosion of public trust
The deeper problem:
When businesses that follow the rules struggle to survive while those willing to cut corners gain a competitive advantage, food safety is no longer merely a problem of individual morality or regulation.
The system of the Communist Party of China becomes a problem of incentives, market structure, accountability, and ultimately social trust.
Chinese authorities in Hebei Province launched an emergency police investigation after environmental blogger Yulie Qige caught wholesalers dipping freshly harvested cabbages into carcinogenic formaldehyde solution.
Video footage captured in Tunken Township shows workers systematically submerging produce into chemical containers labeled "formaldehyde solution" before loading trucks for long-distance transport. Drivers on the scene admitted the toxic bath extends shelf life by two to three days, allowing them to avoid paying for expensive refrigerated shipping.
Formaldehyde is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen and is strictly illegal in food processing. Yet wholesalers used the chemical preservative to keep cabbages looking firm and white during transit.
This is not an isolated incident. A nearly identical scandal broke out in Shandong province in 2012, proving that dangerous food safety shortcuts remain a recurring threat in China's agricultural supply chain.
China produces over 30 million tonnes of cabbage annually, representing nearly half of global supply. The viral exposure forced China's State Council Food Safety Office to order nationwide market spot checks while customs officials in Hong Kong and South Korea heightened border monitoring.
@Unveiled_ChinaX When honest businesses cannot survive by being honest, food safety becomes more than a regulatory problem—it becomes a systemic problem.
Under the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the “One Country, Two Systems” framework, Hong Kong was promised a high degree of autonomy and the preservation of its way of life for 50 years after 1997.
Yet today, peaceful political opposition, independent media, and even public remembrance of Tiananmen have faced sweeping restrictions under national-security laws.
This is bigger than Hong Kong. When dealing with the CCP, democracies should remember:
A signature is not a safeguard.
A promise is not protection.
Trust must be backed by verification and consequences.
We can‘t trust the Communist Party of China. In order to maintain their own dictatorship, they can break any promise and make big lies.
Sometimes when I see these flips and jumps, my first thought is gymnastics or martial arts.
Classical Chinese dance has its own rich tradition of tumbling, movement, and technical skills, with a long cultural history behind them.
It makes me appreciate how much training goes into the movements that look so effortless on the Shen Yun stage.
#ShenYun
#ClassicalChineseDance #ChineseCulture
China is not the CCP.
Chinese civilization is not Communist Party culture.
China has thousands of years of history. The CCP has ruled for only a fraction of it.
Traditional Chinese civilization emphasized values such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, integrity, respect for heaven, and moral responsibility. Communist political campaigns instead demanded ideological conformity and loyalty to the Party.
@pjanik_otm@JWUpacific@ForeignPolicy I‘m a real person, not the robot you said.
A new account doesn’t make an argument false, and calling someone a “bot” doesn’t make your argument true.
A 2009 Chinese state-media report cited public-security officials estimating that 30,000 to 60,000 children were reported missing in China each year, while noting that it was difficult to determine how many of those cases involved human trafficking.
Think about that contrast.
The CCP has filled China’s streets, neighborhoods, train stations, and public spaces with an enormous surveillance network. It spends more than one trillion RMB annually on domestic public-security and “stability maintenance” systems.
Yet tens of thousands of children have historically been reported missing.
Cameras are everywhere—but why can’t they keep a child safe?
A government capable of tracking citizens on such a massive scale should be asked why comparable resources and technology cannot do more to protect vulnerable children, combat trafficking networks, and reunite families.
A surveillance state is not necessarily a safe society.
The real measure of security is not how effectively a government can monitor its people, but how effectively it can protect them.
Traditional Chinese culture emphasized benevolence, righteousness, morality, and responsibility toward others. The tragedy is not that Chinese people lack humanity—it is that decades of CCP rule have severely damaged the moral and social foundations that once nurtured it.
A truly strong society is one where people are not afraid to be good.
The CCP did not merely change China’s political system. Over decades, it systematically attacked many foundations of traditional Chinese culture.
Temples were destroyed, religious practices suppressed, classical traditions denounced, intellectuals persecuted, and during the Cultural Revolution even Confucius, traditional morality, ancestral customs, and historical artifacts became political targets.
Traditional Chinese civilization emphasized values such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, integrity, respect for heaven, and moral responsibility. Communist political campaigns instead demanded ideological conformity and loyalty to the Party.
This distinction matters:
China is not the CCP.
Chinese civilization is not Communist Party culture.
China has thousands of years of history. The CCP has ruled for only a fraction of it.
To understand China, we should rediscover the civilization that existed long before communism—and preserve what political movements tried to destroy.
America should remain open—but not naïve.
Academic openness is one of America’s great strengths—but openness cannot mean blindly transferring sensitive, taxpayer-funded knowledge to institutions closely connected to the PLA.
Under the CCP’s military-civil fusion strategy, the boundary between civilian research and military application can become deliberately blurred. Aircraft sensors, structural-health monitoring, AI, advanced materials, and other dual-use technologies may have both civilian and defense applications.
Traditional Chinese culture emphasized benevolence, righteousness, morality, and responsibility toward others. The tragedy is not that Chinese people lack humanity—it is that decades of CCP rule have severely damaged the moral and social foundations that once nurtured it.
A truly strong society is one where people are not afraid to be good.
Technology can make a society faster. Surveillance can make it more controlled. But neither can manufacture compassion, conscience, or genuine kindness.
When decades of political campaigns, fear, fraud, and suppression of independent civil society teach people that helping a stranger may bring trouble, something far more important than economic growth is being lost: trust between human beings.
China can build the world’s fastest trains and densest surveillance grid. It still can’t make a stranger stop when someone collapses on the street
Yaqiu Wang’s piece in @ForeignPolicy explains why even prosperous Chinese elites keep leaving. The breaking point is rarely politics. It’s the daily indifference: a man having a seizure at a Beijing bus stop, no one checking. A boy asking his father what’s wrong, told to mind his own business.
Decades of pengci scams, courts that punish good Samaritans, and a Party that treats independent civil society as a threat have taught people that helping a stranger can cost you. Official campaigns push “positive energy.” Cameras watch everything. None of it manufactures trust.
The CCP delivers order and convenience for the urban middle class. It cannot deliver human warmth. People want to believe a neighbor will speak up if they disappear, or that joining others to help the vulnerable won’t make them a target.
That’s why runxue - the study of how to “run”—still thrives. Fast trains aren’t enough when the society around them feels cold by design.
https://t.co/xD8RGnfUQS
Spyware found on a cabinet secretary’s devices would raise serious questions: Who installed it? Who authorized it? What information was accessed? How long was it there, and who ultimately received the data?
No institution should be above scrutiny. Transparency and accountability are essential to a free society. 🇺🇸
@TrumpWarRoom@karolineleavitt Happy Birthday, Karoline! 🎂🇺🇸
Wishing you a wonderful year ahead filled with strength, wisdom, and happiness. Keep speaking with courage and serving with conviction. God bless you and your family!
The battlefield doesn’t have to look like a battlefield. Agricultural genetics, university research, AI, data, supply chains, infrastructure, finance, and institutional relationships can all have strategic value.
The most sophisticated influence operation doesn’t necessarily break down the door. It may build relationships until someone opens the door for it.
This is why unrestricted warfare is so difficult for free societies to recognize.
The battlefield doesn’t have to look like a battlefield. Agricultural genetics, university research, AI, data, supply chains, infrastructure, finance, and institutional relationships can all have strategic value.
The most sophisticated influence operation doesn’t necessarily break down the door. It may build relationships until someone opens the door for it.
That does not mean every U.S.-China scientific exchange is espionage. It means sensitive cooperation requires transparency, counterintelligence screening, and strict controls over access.
So establish the facts:
Who arranged the access?
Who funded the relationships?
Which PRC institutions were involved?
What resources were requested?
What was actually accessed?
In modern strategic competition, follow the money, follow the relationships, follow the data—and follow the access. 🇺🇸
EXCLUSIVE: CCP SPIES INSIDE USDA?
I found a Chinese-language government notice revealing that an official PRC delegation was scheduled to enter a USDA research facility and pursue the “utilization and cooperation” of genetic resources held inside.
The American organization arranging the visit never disclosed it publicly. Beijing did.
Who was opening the door?
The planned access led me to the U.S.-China Green Institute—a little-known nonprofit founded by former U.S. Ambassadors Terry Branstad and David Adelman and China-focused financier Jonathan Krane.
Beijing calls Branstad Xi Jinping’s “old friend.” Weeks before the planned USDA visit, Krane’s investment firm was still majority-owned by CICC USA—indirectly owned by China’s sovereign wealth fund.
The Institute also signed a “historic” agreement with a foundation created and overseen by CPAFFC.
The State Department says CPAFFC is tasked with co-opting governments and “malignly” influencing American leaders.
In plain English: a CCP influence front.
The biosecurity threat is not hypothetical. Chinese nationals have already been prosecuted for stealing proprietary American seeds and smuggling a crop-destroying fungus for work inside a U.S. laboratory.
Yet former U.S. officials and a financier tied to Chinese state money quietly helped an official PRC delegation seek entry to a federal research facility.
Did they get inside USDA? What did they access? Who approved it?
CCP-linked influence operations are exploiting legitimate American debates over data centers, energy, or infrastructure to deepen divisions and slow U.S. development, those networks should be exposed and investigated.
America should address real environmental and community concerns—but it should not allow foreign authoritarian influence to manipulate those concerns into strategic paralysis.
Build the energy. Build the infrastructure. Build the AI. Defend freedom—and let America lead. 💪🇺🇸
@RealPNavarro The CCP’s capabilities deserve serious scrutiny—but so does any alleged institutional failure or concealment inside the United States.
National security should be protected by truth and transparency, not politics or secrecy.