Flap Permissionless Launch is now LIVE on @BNBCHAIN - Quote Anything.
Flap now supports custom quote tokens: RWA, blue-chip crypto, trending memes or others 👉 input your quote token CA and launch in One-Click.
Choose the token you want, build a market around it, and layer Flap’s programmable mechanisms on top — Creator Wallet, Dividend, Burn, Liquidity.
You are no longer limited to a predefined set of quote assets. Pick your asset. Build your pair. Design your own token economy.
Build without limits on https://t.co/QxwEidkmg4 🦋
This is Bill.
Bill placed 125 billboards for @solana communities and brands past 12 months
Bill believed in Solana
Bill worked so hard with guys from America, Europe and Australia to deliver content for those billboards total of 38 different locations
Be like Bill
Since no one was keen on answering this question, I've took it upon myself to build a PUBLIC Dune query which uses FOMO's fee router in order to calculate the total profitability of all active FOMO traders (SOL) in the past 90 days.
The numbers:
> Out of the 292,531 wallets traded through FOMO in the last 90 days, 18,033 of them are in profit.
> Only 6.16% of ALL traders in the last 3 months were profitable.
The median trader is down ~$120. As a group they are down $1.26 BILLION. Of the 6% who are green, 88% made under $100. Only 25 out of 292,531 wallets made more than $10K
Query is public and linked below:
https://t.co/sClpsUG8wo
For reference, a "wagering platform" such as Rainbet with a 1% house edge sits at ~37% user profitability over the same time span.
The owner of Flap literally said he wants to have a golden dog that goes to $80M.
Flap PVE Launchpad allows for a coin to have 0 fees.
I'm going to dev Golden Dog, with the ticker being in Chinese and the name being in English.
This is going to be the 80M Golden Dog.
gonna be funny to see how fast sentiment shifts for solana onchain, hyperliquid dominating perps has been incredible for crypto as a whole, but solana has the most activity in the trenches as an L1 by far
1/ Meet Zachary Wolk (@zachxbt), the crypto investigator who's exposed $500M+ in fraud.
He investigated everyone. Nobody ever investigated him.
I found him in a free neighborhood paper. Also found ~$5M of "donations" from the people who never appear in his threads.
Kanye West
- apologized for the Nazi thing
- not in the Epstein files
- didn’t party with Diddy
- made 6 great albums back to back
Just saying @kanyewest
No complexity. No accident.
10/10 was caused by irresponsible marketing campaigns by certain companies.
On October 10, tens of billions of dollars were liquidated. As CEO of OKX, we observed clearly that the crypto market’s microstructure fundamentally changed after that day.
Many industry participants believe the damage was more severe than the FTX collapse. Since then, there has been extensive discussion about why it happened and how to prevent a recurrence. The root causes are not difficult to identify.
⸻
What actually happened
1.Binance launched a temporary user-acquisition campaign offering 12% APY on USDe, while allowing USDe to be used as collateral with the same treatment as USDT and USDC, and without effective limits.
2.USDe is a tokenized hedge fund product.
Ethena raises capital via a so-called “stablecoin,” deploys it into index arbitrage and algorithmic trading strategies, and tokenizes the resulting fund. The token can then be deposited on exchanges to earn yield.
3.USDe is fundamentally different from products such as
BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton BENJI, which are tokenized money market funds with low-risk profiles.
USDe, by contrast, embeds hedge-fund-level risk. This difference is structural, not cosmetic.
4.Binance users were encouraged to convert USDT and USDC into USDe to earn attractive yields, without sufficient emphasis on the underlying risks. From a user’s perspective, trading with USDe appeared no different from trading with traditional stablecoins—while the actual risk profile was materially higher.
5.Risk escalated further as users:
•converted USDT/USDC into USDe,
•used USDe as collateral to borrow USDT,
•converted the borrowed USDT back into USDe,
•and repeated the cycle.
This leverage loop produced artificial APYs of 24%, 36%, and even 70%+, widely perceived as “low risk” simply because they were offered by a major platform. Systemic risk accumulated rapidly across the global crypto market.
https://t.co/IK2gW4xUOP that point, even a small market shock was sufficient to trigger a collapse.
When volatility hit, USDe depegged quickly. Cascading liquidations followed, and weaknesses in risk management around assets such as WETH and BNSOL further amplified the crash. Some tokens briefly traded near zero.
The damage to global users and companies—including OKX customers—was severe, and recovery will take time.
⸻
Why this matters
I am discussing the root cause, not assigning blame or launching an attack on Binance. Speaking openly about systemic risks is sometimes uncomfortable, but it is necessary if the industry is to mature responsibly.
I expect there may be significant misinformation and coordinated FUD directed at OKX in the near future. Even so, speaking honestly about systemic risk is the right thing to do—and we will continue to do so.
As the largest global platform, Binance has outsized influence—and corresponding responsibility—as an industry leader. Long-term trust in crypto cannot be built on short-term yield games, excessive leverage, or marketing practices that obscure risk.
The industry needs leaders who prioritize market stability, transparency, and responsible innovation—not a winner-take-all mentality where criticism is treated as hostility.
Crypto is still early.
What we choose to normalize today will determine whether this industry earns lasting trust—or repeats the same mistakes again.
The cool thing about trading metals is u dont need to worry that copper inu is going to steal all the mindshare from copper while ur asleep. They’re not making new commodities on pumpfun every few seconds