@die_rizzen@pwhhjr It's quite revolting that Moltmann swims in the sewers of philosophy as if he were a beach, completely unprepared to deal with metaphysics.
@clintballinger "Any universe with even the slightest difference in its laws of nature would be radically different than ours". All philosophers care about is that it is metaphysically possible for there to be at least one world in modal space that is extremely similar to our own.
@modelsarereal@keithfrankish But you haven't demonstrated that it is nothing else. You have asserted it. Unlike God, subjective experience is an agreed upon phenomena that has multiple explanations for its nature.
@Eldenofthering@mmjukic What a stupid take. Philosophy, logic and computation are pretty well embedded aspects of philosophy, and most philosophers have been well ahead of the outsider who is only now catching up.
@kellyenz@MusicalChairs14 All financial instruments are self funding by definition as they a species of legal contract, and thus are caused to come into existence by decree. A lot of MMT folk are engineers and they probably appreciate real resource constraints far better than detached economists.
@richie1lmao@iceicebaby_6@YuDai_Tsai A naive take. Within prosecuting the scientific method there is an extraordinary amount of rational argumentation and procuring of conceptual postulates, and interpretations. This only increases as one gets more fundamental.
@wendt_over I think the fact that almost no historical or contemporary philosopher shares his view puts an enormously large burden on you to demonstrate what the numerous other accounts of action and divine action fail. Mises had an intuition about action that few outside his circle share.