sourlax

[sourlax @sourlax]

@CouchNish socialism 101: the chance that your social intervention will have the effect you predicted and no other is zero

[sourlax @sourlax]

@linmeitalks "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" -Lavrentiy Beria

[sourlax @sourlax]

@Smileyyeg "If we try to eradicate that kind of risk completely, all we do is magnify a different kind of risk" https://t.co/HSjecFL6QI

[sourlax @sourlax]

@Slide2theleft_ @burkelibbey don't worry -- you will -- the wheel is already in motion

[sourlax @sourlax]

@burkelibbey "If we try to eradicate that kind of risk completely, all we do is magnify a different kind of risk"

[sourlax @sourlax]

@burkelibbey https://t.co/HSjecFL6QI

[sourlax @sourlax]

@AndyRoden1 on the contrary it will have a great effect -- little to no effect of protecting children, yes -- but that is not the intended effect -- the intended effect is Digital ID and device-level surveillance of every adult

[sourlax @sourlax]

??? how hard is it to enable parental controls on the devices that you buy for your kids? it takes like 5 minutes for every time you buy a new device -- you think the UK Government is better suited for this task? And at the cost of device level Digital ID and anonymous dissent gone forever?

[sourlax @sourlax]

Most parents will be concerned when they realizes they will have to use Digital ID to browse the internet when they thought this was only affecting kids and not them -- they didn't think it through and were fooled -- they were the useful idiots -- and now it's too late as criticism will get jailed because the government can pinpoint you through your device

[sourlax @sourlax]

@dontpannic @AgileHarvey A simple governmental campaign would suffice -- not compulsory device-level Digital ID for every adult ala CCP 😂

[sourlax @sourlax]

@StupidNeilAgain They're upset about compulsory Digital ID surveillance of every adult -- it has literally nothing do with with kids

[sourlax @sourlax]

@NateB_Panic once they control the VPN's, and they already do, what then?

[Steven Barrett @SBarrettBar]

Our country won't get better until we once again accept that this is utterly ridiculous

This is an educated grown up - admitting that they cannot parent

That is unacceptable.

She is a thing of ridicule.

[sourlax @sourlax]

@drunkpopinjay @MhairiHunter the only issue is that this "ban" has nothing to do with Haidt's work -- his work is only bastardized as the slogan to sell an even worse problem which is compulsory device level Digital ID for all adults

[sourlax @sourlax]

@MhairiHunter this "ban" has nothing to do with banning children for using social media -- parents can already restrict what apps their children access on their devices through parental controls -- this "ban" is about Digital ID surveillance for every adult -- the slogan is a false flag

[sourlax @sourlax]

@jaynemesis it is immensely damaging -- but this "move" has nothing to do with alleviating it -- you are the useful idiot

[sourlax @sourlax]

@GuyLambertUK of course -- the point is Digital ID and hardware level surveillance -- the slogan is irrelevant

[sourlax @sourlax]

@absolutelyamyyy this poll is so nefarious -- social media for kids is bad but the proposed "solution" has nothing to do with banning kids from social media -- they just call it a "ban" because it sounds reasonable without bothering with any of the details

[sourlax @sourlax]

@zatzi because it has nothing to do with banning children from social media and everything to do with Digital ID verification of everyone using a phone -- one tiny step at a time: https://t.co/3KO65FTm40

[sourlax @sourlax]

@WestminsterWAG just means the kids with smart-phones will out-compete the kids without smart-phones -- and it won't even be close