Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations

Helping people to understand the causes of things...

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

🚢 Join us for this special conference at sea featuring
@ConceptualJames and @SovMichael! Go to https://t.co/UpoIaLIZ8A for details and registration.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Year 2030 transition phase has been the Goethe-inspired end goal of the transhumanists for decades.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Those who are actively working to disrupt conservatism must band together and challenge those who uncovered the "revolution in a box" that introduced CRT and Neo-Marxist elements into our core societal structures seven years ago.

The producer noted below is part of the manufactured neo-reactionary response to the Woke Left, which was notably quiet while the Woke Left experienced its revival from 2012 to 2020.

[Blake Kresses @BlakeKresses]

There are people like Tucker, Candace, Carroll, who attempt to sabotage the Right by making further-right positions look retarded and literally voting for Democrats.

Then there’s disaffected libtards like James Lindsay who attempt to sabotage the Right by making it more socially liberal and gatekeeping actual conservatives.

Each group thrives off of and cannot exist without the other. Each wants the other to gain more prominence to bolster the legitimacy of their own. Both are equally destructive to furthering the actually political goals of the American people.

Both are the Retard Right.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

A correct assessment of Richard Nixon.

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

It’s no surprise Richard Nixon is having a massive popularity revival right now, especially among Gen Z.

Back in 1972, Nixon showed the political establishment how to win young voters: he completely ignored the noise on college campuses and spoke directly to everyday working young adults. Add in the fact that he was likely an early target of the Deep State, and it’s easy to see why so many young conservatives are drawn to his story today.

But be careful who you follow.

Nixon’s populist instinct came packed with heavy-handed state control. When economic pressure hit, he didn't lean into free markets; he imposed federal wage and price freezes. He pulled America off the gold standard, created massive federal bureaucracy like the EPA, and used government power against his enemies.
Liking his toughness is one thing. But before you make him your hero, look at the whole file.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

What you will now experience is the creation of controlled opposition that will continue the spiral of the dialectic.

Actors in contrived conflict that will lead to the popularization of both participants that will both usher us into the "revolution".

[PBD Podcast @PBDsPodcast]

🚨Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson: The Charlie Kirk Debate. @RealCandaceO @paleochristcon

August 14th at 10 AM ET. Set Your Reminders ↓
https://t.co/IAb11lSn8o

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Because Trump and his immediate team are not post liberals. Donald Trump is not an ideologue.

He is transactional and whatever transaction that is within constitutional limits, he thinks he can win he will do.

These people are not transactional they’re ideological. And their ideology freaking sucks.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Vance is the symptom of the problem which is Thiel and the transhumanist TechBros who would like nothing more than to Balkanize the United States and plunge America into techno-feudalism.

Vance is the carefully constructed instrument of Thiel who prepared Vance to disrupt and dismantle constitutional politics.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Vance is a problem. Everyone sees it now, or almost everyone. The dam already broke. I was just really early, like usual.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Bill understands the triumph of the reformation.

Be like Bill...

[Bill Roach @billroach_]

Actually the destruction of a false synthetic reality of the Christian religion started in 1517.

The critical consciousness of Rome, and its so-called form of godliness, is no longer required.

We no longer have to interpret reality and religion through the epistemic constructs of the magisterium.

What’s a blessed day!

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Notice Miller said "rule of interpretation" and Wolfe turned it into Woke Right living constitution slop where the "nation" (by its authorized representatives) rules the law.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

PBD is a willing mouthpiece of the meta-system transition.

[diana bloom @diana_bloom_]

Did @benshapiro see this post before going on PBD's podcast? PBD LOVES the clip of Vance attacking Israel, saying Trump is the only ally they have left in the world, making up claims about people within the Israeli cabinet attacking Trump, and trying to scare them by emphasizing how dependent they are on the United States.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

This is what happens when you abandon your constitutional foundations in the false promises of individual power on the other side of “the revolution.”

[Jason Hart @jasonahart]

.@BlazeTV talent @JohnDoyle on @TuckerCarlson's 2024 interview with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin:
"Putin will show Americans for the first time what a statesman is"
🧵

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Christian Nationalists have been saying this for years.

[Cody Libolt @CodyLibolt]

I still do not know of a single one. The same deficiencies of character that got them into that mess now keep them away from accountability.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Funny how this went.

[Phil Magness @PhilWMagness]

Postliberal Dolores Umbridge is mad that I corrected JD Vance for haplessly enlisting the "dismal science" label to falsely accuse economists of neglecting slavery's moral horror.

The label came from a pro-slavery essay in 1849 that attacked economists for supporting abolition.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

@RealDonMarshall That vision led me into professional tennis from 1990 - 2003.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Men's professional tennis in the late 1970s and early 1980s drew U.S. television ratings and viewership that rivaled or even occasionally surpassed the NBA.

Tennis was not as monolithic as today's game with characters seemingly written for a drama with different styles, swings, and personalities.

Today we do have some one handed players still around: Wawrinka, Musetti, Tsitsipas, Dimitrov and only a handful of serve and volleyers (more often than not, serve-bots).

I would love to go back to the original surfaces and see who can compete on glass-like grass at Wimbledon, achingly slow red clay, and moderate hard court surfaces that would create variety and and opportunity for players to test their skills in variable situations.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

@RealDonMarshall

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

He’s dead wrong. @ConceptualJames forces the right to deal with things they want to sweep under the rug because it’s uncomfortable.

That’s not how it works. James Lindsey predicted the rise of the Jew hater class, he was right on the woke right, on the influencer class trying to corrupt MAGA and he was right about postliberalism.

He doesn’t want the right to win? No he doesn’t want the right to become the left and neither do a lot of people who have been paying attention.

The truth doesn’t care if you like it or not.

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

Please understand:

The people who are at the ideological center of the Critical America Theory movement are acting as a vanguard:

a small, highly organized, and dedicated group of people who lead the larger working class or revolutionary movement - which shares the same goals as the progressive left - the Balkanization of America, the end of individual liberty, the beginning of techno-feudalism, and the rise of global multipolarity.

Vladimir Lenin made this concept famous in Marxist theory, most clearly in his 1902 text What Is to Be Done? Lenin believed a trained, professional group was necessary to teach political ideas and steer the broader public toward revolution.

This vanguard group that has invaded Republican and conservative ranks has used a tactic known as *entryism* to gain the levers of power in the Republican Party.

Entryism is a revolutionary political strategy in which members of political group or ideology join a larger organization (such as a Republican Party or the Democrat Party (DSA)) with the goal of influencing, changing, or eventually controlling it from within.

They have, in many ways, accomplished their goals while running a cultural revolution - out with the "old" Republican ideas and in with the "new" vanguard Republican ideas that curiously mimic the ideas and goals of the leftist democrats at their core.

Perhaps you didn't see this clearly when @ConceptualJames and I began to warn of the rise of this entryist movement back in 2021 - 2022.

But you see it now. So what should your response be?

Well, first of all, call them out for their "wolves in sheep's clothing" attempt to hijack conservatism.

Secondly, attempt to engage with them using objective criteria and evidences of their attempt at transforming conservatism. They will not argue in good faith. They will resort to ad hominem, false accusations, and projection.

Thirdly, begin discussing this issue (with clear examples - not just here-say) with Republican leaders. Let them know of your concerns. You will find that many Republican leaders are in a hermetically sealed bubble and have no idea what has been happening around them for the last 4 years.

Continue to provide clear examples if you are initially rejected.

Lastly, be helpful to your old guard conservative leaders. Don't threaten to quit (or worse). Be the one that can help them navigate a pathway back to constitutional sanity.

We must win...

[Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations @SovMichael]

The proper term for those that call themselves "postliberal" would be "Post-America".

In other words, they would like to move on from the ideas of the Founding Fathers and into a "New Founding" of their own making: a Balkanized, Neo-Integralist, liberty-less, techno-feudalist vision for what was the United States of America.