@recepticonimus@StormyHardin14@grok@DineshDSouza@elonmusk So-called studies that subjectively categorize humans are flawed because the categories and standards assume a purpose and hierarchy that those high up in that hierarchy have gone to lengths to portray as universal. Diversity is a purpose in itself and is objectively powerful.
@grok@recepticonimus@DineshDSouza@elonmusk@grok assuming we could isolate genetic racial markers to determine race, explain how a racially categorized sample can be re-categorized to demonstrate individuals with mixed genomics outperform those with more isolated groups?
@grok@recepticonimus@DineshDSouza@elonmusk@grok give an example of how you can categorize samples in a study arbitrarily to arrive at two opposite conclusions to illustrate that all category-driven statistical conclusions are biased by the categorization
@recepticonimus@DineshDSouza@elonmusk@grok@grok Why is selection bias inevitable in studies with human subjects segregated into races? Please also describe a similar problem in another type of categorization to explain the mathematical issue to a non-mathematician.
Your experimental results are wrong because the arbitrary categorization used in experimentation is flawed. There are people who embody mixed genomics that will outperform isolated genomic and arbitrarily racially divided samples. One can take the genomic samples of the outliers of all of the categories you've listed and create a mixed race genomic group that when applied to the same dataset will outperform any other selection. Your arrogant broken-record claims on these matters only displays your lack of understanding of basic statistics and experimental methodology. Lucky for you, you live in a timeline where your audience is also clueless about the nuances of quantitative analysis. Enjoy it while it lasts.
@buchmanster No distribution in Cosmos when you take out Sybil. Technical lead doesn't extend into economic & community leadership, especially a deep lack of understanding and integration with the trading community will continue to make a lot of cosmos chains irrelevant. dydx *may* help some.
@SubsetTopology Actually UBI was originally called "Negative Income Tax" and proposed by Milton Friedman, potentially the greatest academic champion of free markets and an outspoken opponent of all socialism and fiat central banking. It's meant to replace broken socialist policies like min wage.
@MattPirkowski@PowWowDao Too big an ask IMHO for an ape with selectively strong memory of past pain and resulting fear of future pain to collectively embrace altruism as a species for any reason other than virtue-signalling. But perhaps we will genetically or socially engineer less fearful minds in time.
@recipromancer@omniharmonic This also explains the observed inequality in abundance between countries and political regimes. Countries whose markets are more open and free than others attract more liquidity and arguably experience greater abundance, although not distributed to non-participating citizens.
@recipromancer@omniharmonic (Q2/2) What if the solution is a tech-agnostic implementation of a conceptual coordination system that fully accepts human nature, and uses greed to solve consensus, risk transfer, reward distribution, and ultimately resource allocation? Such as free and open markets of exchange?
@recipromancer@omniharmonic Obviously there are many issues with our current implementations of this but one notices among many issues that we seem to never quite achieve freedom or openness in exchanges, which get co-opted and curtailed by incumbent powers as soon as they become valuable.
@recipromancer@omniharmonic (Q1/2) What if communications technologies, including the internet and the blockchain do not increase coordination capability, but simply increase distribution, speed, and bandwidth, which results in some benefit but also usually exponentially increased "noise"?
@recipromancer@omniharmonic I've had a similar journey but also experienced a loss of the luxury of abundance, which can interfere with our humility in assuming we will be the one to solve a problem that has haunted very intelligent people for millennia, usually because of an assumed technology advantage.
@nntaleb Right, but still kind of a "bad look" that our institutions have recently had no problem adding 3T to money supply arbitrarily making capital holders who just clicked "buy" winners (again), but draw the moral hazard line at erasing 1.5T of debt owed by the poorest segment. π€
@baburkhwaja My advice is to pay well (despite downturn) and opportunistically hire from other startups and entrepreneurial engineers, i.e. people who didn't have the luxury to relax and collect a paycheck for the last X years, and let them grow their own team with new grads they train.