Christopher Nolan will most likely adapt another story for his next film. I really fking want him to go back to an original screenplay. You only get one Interstellar in a generation.
India Should have...
Prime Minister = Educated
Finance Minister = Economist
Health Minister = Doctor
Commerce Minister = CA
Defence Minister = Army men
Education Minister = IAS/IPS
Agriculture Minister = Farmer
Sports Minister = Sports men
RBI Governor = Economist
Ajit Agarkar is set to step down as BCCI Chief Selector in September.
This could significantly increase the chances of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli playing in the 2027 ODI World Cup.
🚨 Dark Reality of the Indian Cricket Team 😱
Since the 2024 T20 World Cup, India has played only three away ODI series (excluding the Champions Trophy).
🇱🇰 Sri Lanka Tour:
Rohit Sharma was the only Indian batter to score two 50+ knocks. No other Indian batter even managed a single fifty.
🇦🇺 Australia Tour:
Rohit Sharma was the only player from either team to score a century (121). He also finished as the highest run-scorer with 202 runs, while the second-highest scorer was an Australian batter with 112 runs.
🏴 England Tour:
Once again, Rohit Sharma was the only Indian batter to score a century (138).
Across all three away ODI tours, Rohit Sharma was India's standout batter.
Yet, despite being fit and consistently performing, the conversation always seems to revolve around Rohit Sharma's retirement simply because of his age.
If a player is fit, performing, and scoring runs, then why is the focus always on retiring him early just because of his age? 🤔
What do you think is age more important than performance?