This prick doesn’t think kids’ brains are developed enough to be criminally culpable, until they’re 25
But he thinks they ARE developed enough in their teens or earlier to decide to get their tits or cock & balls removed
Greer is a F’ing deviant
Did you ever think you'd live to see the day where a WOMAN leading the largest Union in the UK with the largest number of women members would argue against women's right to single sex spaces in the workplace?
No me neither.
Find a better union ladies.
Also the guidance doesn't cover workplaces, it's not even relevant, that's covered by separate legislation. Absolute clowns.
Unison have over 1.3 million members. They’ve turned off replies to their unlawful post on single sex spaces and can’t manage more than 322 likes. Pathetic.
Diversity is so powerful in the police right now that a straight colleague of mine had to declare himself bisexual just to get an interview for the firearms unit.
They even stated they preferred Officers from protected characteristics on the advertisement.
Applied twice.
Same documents, same experience, same everything.
Turned down both times.
Third time he changed just one tick on the form — from straight to bisexual.
Suddenly… invited for interview.
They were openly prioritising “protected characteristics” over experience and competence.
This isn’t inclusion.
This is institutional insanity.
#PoliceDiversity #WokeFail
I would really like a journalist to calmly and politely ask all these politicians why George Floyd merited the wholesale transformation of British society, while Henry Nowak doesn't.
Why does one justify riots, taking the knee, the toppling of statues, and the embedding of race quotas across every public institution, while the other does not?
Do they not view this as politicising Floyd's death? Do they not think it was at all divisive? Do they not think it odd that a man dying in America is more politically important than a boy dying in Britain?
You don't need to rant and rave at these politicians. It is not "MAGA" to notice the difference. You just need to ask them to try and explain their position.
Liberals: "White English people are not discriminated against."
The BBC: "here are all the reasons why you, your ancestors, and your descendants do not exist and have no right to your ancestral homeland."
Propaganda that would make Pravda blush. Abolish the BBC.
After posting threatening messages I received yesterday, I was contacted by someone who supports the Pakistani rape gang survivors.
She has confirmed that six survivors have received almost the exact same threatening messages from the same man in Bradford who targeted me.
This man has been verified as connected to the Pakistani Muslim network linked to the grooming gangs.
@RupertLowe10’s Rape Gang Inquiry has also identified these gangs operating in Cheshire West and Chester, right next door to Wrexham. Every woman in the area needs to be aware.
Other messages I’ve received confirm that I am now a target.
I contacted @NWPolice yesterday and gave a statement over the phone this morning. I’m still waiting for the written version to review and sign before it is forwarded to @WestYorksPolice, who cover Bradford.
To any right-leaning women out there who are not afraid to speak out or any women at all: regularly check your message requests and report everything suspicious or threatening.
This is all very much still ongoing. These men, and the grooming gangs behind them, must be held accountable.
I will not be silenced. I will not back down. I will continue to exercise my legal right to free speech about what is happening to the United Kingdom.
Especially not by weak foreign men in my country who only threaten women.
This is what is known as a sorites paradox. Some concepts do not admit of a firm boundary between it and not-it. For example, how many grains of sand are a heap? 100? If we take away a grain, is 99 not a heap? 98? 97? If we continue subtracting grains of sand, at some point, we arrive at a point where we no longer have a heap. But that doesn't mean heaps no longer exist, as we conceded they do already; there is simply no firm line where a heap becomes a not-heap.
Asking someone to do something that is not possible is generally considered unfair or absurd, so asking someone to draw a firm line where none can exist is unfair and absurd.
What is far right?
Historically, the far right refers to political movements that are authoritarian, anti-democratic, and often seek to organise society around ethnic, racial, or religious hierarchies.
It does not simply mean:
Supporting border controls.
Believing in biological sex.
Defending women’s rights.
Criticising a religion.
Supporting free speech.
Holding conservative views.
If “far right” means anyone who disagrees with progressive politics, then the term has lost all meaning.
You can label me far right all you like, it won’t change the words I say or the views I hold.
@SamanthaNiblet4 Here is an example of a child rapist using they/them pronouns and the BBC respecting it. The girl he attacked was waking up terrified for weeks.
I say it’s wrong to respect his pronouns. I think it’s bad manners to his victim. Do you?
https://t.co/UGFOvuuVF8
Keir Starmer stood up and said there’s “no such thing as two-tier policing.”
Yet at the same time, police chiefs were out yesterday saying they’re reviewing “controversial guidance” that apparently tells officers to treat ethnic minorities differently.
You genuinely can’t make this country up anymore. The level of absurdity is just ridiculous.
Another woman's job is being threatened over her gender critical views. This time, Agnes Wold in Sweden.
Agnes Wold is a much-loved public intellectual in Sweden who is known for her feminism, her level-headed response to the COVID lockdown hysteria (she’s a bacteriologist), and, more recently, for refusing to go along with the transgender dogma that has gripped Swedish bureaucratic, activist, media and political elites.
On 20 May, the Swedish parliament approved an amendment to the law that criminalises “psychological violence” and “coercion” relating to “gender identity or gender expression (such as conversion practices)”, among other things. It is widely understood to be Sweden’s version of a conversion therapy ban (a more explicit law is likely if the left coalition gets into power in September).
Speaking on a radio programme about the law, Wold told the host that she would take 4 years in prison— the penalty for trying to prevent someone from leaning into their opposite-sex, delusion — before she would allow the gender transition of a grandchild (hard agree).
This comment set off major drama, with one famous gay media guy calling her the Swedish equivalent to “old hag” or “old crone”. Specifically, he said “get rid of the old hag. It is unethical of Sveriges Radio to give her access to a microphone,” which is a way of saying she should be fired from her public radio job.
Many, many people have called for Agnes Wold to be fired throughout the trans-mania era, and a lot of them seemed to be hoping that this comment would be the final nail in her coffin. But the remarks seem to have the opposite effect. Not only did Swedish people get very offended by this little shithead calling their beloved based radio-granny an old hag, they started to ask questions about the law that she was criticising.
And that, boys and girls, is how the omerta on the trans mass derangement got partially lifted in Sweden, and suddenly everyone started to ask: wait, what? Some kids think they’re in the wrong body and you can go to jail for telling them to snap out of it? Yes, dear Swedes, that’s what’s happening. Welcome to the conversation. We’ve been expecting you.
As of writing, Wold still has not yet been fired.