“Trump’s new deal with Greenland is exactly the same as the old one!”
Not true at all. Key new details:
Duration: The 1951 deal lasted only as long as NATO existed and Greenland remained part of NATO. Trump’s 2026 deal lasts indefinitely, even if NATO implodes or Greenland becomes independent.
New Military Bases: In the 1951 deal, the U.S. could establish “defense areas” in Greenland only if Denmark gave the go-ahead. In Trump’s 2026 deal, the U.S. can establish military installations as it sees fit, with or without Denmark’s approval.
Third Countries: In the 1951 deal, Denmark retained the right to allow foreign nations, like China, to establish a presence in Greenland. Trump’s 2026 deal explicitly forbids foreign nations from doing anything in Greenland without U.S. approval.
Foreign Investments: The 1951 deal placed no restrictions on foreign nations making investments in Greenland, such as port build-outs, critical mineral mining, or undersea cable installations. Trump’s 2026 deal requires U.S. approval before foreign nations can invest in Greenland.
Simply put, Trump’s new Greenland deal is an absolutely massive geopolitical accomplishment, further establishing America’s dominance over the Western Hemisphere.
@MPelletierCIO How naive if someone thinks it's a good idea for Canada to join the EU. Europe itself is crumbling. The globalists destroyed European countries, and now they want to destroy Canada.
@KirkLubimov Carney is literally doing the dirty work on behalf of the British, i.e. destroying Canada on their way out because "if we cannot have Canada, no one can have Canada. This has always been their polity since 1781.
@Kalshi PPP GDP is to be used to compare domestic outputs and living standards across different countries. It's not a measure for comparing global power and influence, technology, military, financial systems, institutions, and capital markets.
@Martyupnorth It's not just about successful separation. It's also about how a young independent Alberta as a country will survive in this world of relentless political and economic power struggles. 51st state is a better choice in a practical sense.
@DustyRoseYYC From a strategic point of view, joining the U.S. as a state is a better choice for both Alberta and the U.S. Think about national defense, geopolitical security, international trade. Otherwise, the globalist could crush a new independent Alberta easily.
@HesapChakma@SHL0MS Totally agree. The question itself is comparing apples to oranges. The value of the original Monet's painting is not only about the techniques. It is the originality of the idea, the fresh creation, the intuition from the artist that values the most.
@HealthRanger Come on. DeepSeek used the smuggled Nvidia Blackwell chips through Super Micro Computer to train its most advanced models. That's not called innovation. That's stealing!
@ExnerPirot@grok If Edmonton, Alberta were on permanent daylight saving time what time would sunrise occur on
January 1? Also are their historic examples of political regimes that have used time changes for political purposes?
@calgaryherald We need to be on Permanent Standard Time!! It is BAD to be on Daylight Saving time permanently. It will cause circadian rhythm disruptions, chronic misalignment between human biology and the sun, dangerous winter mornings and mental health problems.
@RiseOfAlberta I think many people may feel confused about the association or differences between Stay Free Alberta and Alberta Prosperity Project. If you guys can provide clarity to the public, that will be very helpful.
@iGlobalGold You are genuine. This is what makes you stand out from those influencers and the crowd in this field. Not only are you adept and professional at what you do, you are also grounded and sensible. Thanks for sharing the story through the link in your bio. It was very touching!