CombatDisinformation

🇺🇦 Sláva Ukrayíni! 🇺🇦

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@utalkntme @4mergangsta @TerryOBrien4 "loose form of the truth" says the one literally lying:
https://t.co/yl78n6qThP

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Don_is_King @RealSilentNinja @marifasuslupin1 @GREidY_McBaztrd @ThisIsKyleR Par. 939.48(1m)(b) refers to the presumption described in par. 939.48(1m)(ar) and negates the Stand-Your-Ground presumption therein.
https://t.co/SdfQaCL8MW

Which of the two SYG conditions do you think applied to Rittenhouse? (ar)(1) or (ar)(2)?

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Don_is_King @RealSilentNinja @marifasuslupin1 @GREidY_McBaztrd The defense provided sufficient evidence to raise the issue of (3)(c) (legality of the rifle & his age) as the law and the instruction requires:
https://t.co/DZ0lbr3C31
https://t.co/4KfcpPiAnG

Subsequently, the prosecution failed to prove that the exception was not present.
1/2

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Matthewlefebvr3 @MetalCoreNTacos @MikuChan1998 @CurtOsmond > Nobody can determine how close Joseph was to Kyle

The forensic pathologist testified as to how close Joseph was to Kyle when shot, in addition to multiple angles of video footage showing the chase and the shooting.

https://t.co/bZ3LmaX5WU
https://t.co/W42ALgiQqr

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Amazingginsu @mynameissquatch @Manuels26652430 Rosenbaum openly professed his reason to jump him in his earlier threats, which multiple witnesses testified to hearing: To "kill him" and "to cut his heart out".

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Amazingginsu @mynameissquatch @Manuels26652430 > I saw several videos of him confronting people.

Go on, show them.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Amazingginsu @mynameissquatch @Manuels26652430 > I know he came over state lines
Going to work required him to cross them, yes.

> was given a weapon of war
I don't know of any military using M&P15's. Do you?

> wasn’t anywhere near the ‘property’ he said he was protecting
Incorrect. He was chased onto one of the lots.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 That is, again, incorrect. WI s. 29.304 does not place any restrictions on hunting onto 17-year-olds.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Btw, the mentorship program is enshrined into law via 29.304(4m), and thereby an entirely separate exception from the ones' cited above.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 The DNR doesn't legislate Wisconsin law. The Wisconsin legislature does. No amount of linking their website will make their statements law.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Are you talking about any specific person "14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age " ?

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Furthermore, under the conditions given by 29.304 (3)(a)(2), 14-/15-year-olds may, alternatively to being accompanied under (3)(a)(1), also hunt unaccompanied.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Misinformation. The "Restrictions on hunting", specifically 29.304(2)(a) and (3)(a), which legally define the requirement to be accompanied, only extend to persons "under 16 years of age":
https://t.co/nHSf5GpCYB

, like the "Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm".

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Misinformation. The exceptions under subsection 948.60(3) do not require one to be hunting:
https://t.co/TPHQjz4hdP

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MarianD77613745 @GbabyPboy @sirxeko @Teddygram62 Did you bother to watch the trial? The charge was dismissed for failure to prove the elements required under 948.60 on the part of the prosecution.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@Amazingginsu @mynameissquatch @Manuels26652430 Go on, make your point. Do you have any evidence supporting your claim of him threatening people?

I've equally mentioned all three people shot in my prior tweet. Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz. Rosenbaum was the bully threatening and chasing down Rittenhouse on video.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@MajGen_A_Harris @JonLawr45183174 @MikeArchrr @Danmastro85 From what I've heard, they were pretty much estranged, so I doubt he had a legal residence there.

Though yes, if he had had legal residence in Wisconsin, (a)(5) wouldn't apply.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@GreyKnight8008 @MikeArchrr @MajGen_A_Harris @JonLawr45183174 @Danmastro85 Whether or not Black violated 18 USC 922 (a)(5) is an entirely separate legal matter from Kyle's possession.

There's no connection here, even if you're for some reason trying to draw one.

[CombatDisinformation @speaktrueth]

@GreyKnight8008 @MikeArchrr @MajGen_A_Harris @JonLawr45183174 @Danmastro85 The state prosecutors are not federal prosecutors. And Kyle's possession is a separate legal matter from Black's lending/transfer/giving/whatever.