splinter

love movies and popcorn

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @aa73561 @wil_da_beast630 Liar.

[splinter @splinte04728]

Life is the process of turning entropy into meaning.

[splinter @splinte04728]

People looking in the rear view mirror, searching for the meaning is like regarded. Real humans look towards the future for meaning. #extremely #few

[splinter @splinte04728]

...which gives: you don't "find it"; you manifest it.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@peterktodd Nakamoto's paradox: Because Bitcoin strives to merge all its satoshis into a single integer, bitcoin fractions into many.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@giacomozucco @dr_orlovsky Tthe guy think he is dangling a carrot and threatening with a stick, but aschtually Bitcoin use Trump, to force China to use Bitcoin, to force USA to force the world to feed Bitcoin more value.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@nopara73 2/2 pretty predictable, which we confuse with "this is permanance infinity". Could be fluke, that we just happen to exist in semi-permanent structure & when we investigate it, find seemingly fundamental rules. Kind of when u "see repeating patterns" in random noise.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@nopara73 Suddenly a word-limited tweet feels limiting :-D. I don't think there is a proof that there must be rules, for things to make sense. Also I'm not sure that seemingly permanent structures (such as fundamental physical laws) must always exist. I believe we live in a pocket of 1/2

[splinter @splinte04728]

@nopara73 2/2 instead logic/computation/what-ever is a subset of reality and very useful in dealing with "pockets" or "sliding windows of permanence". while understanding the universe using logic maybe is possible?!, trying to reduce reality (which is greater then our universe) ain't.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@nopara73 lol so funny :'-D, but yes I concluded same & then it occurred to me that real randomness (not chaos) seems to be impossible to derive from logic, yet randomness (though impossible to prove) seems to exist at quantum level. my main take away is that reality is NOT computation.1/2

[splinter @splinte04728]

@nopara73 Yes. Agreed. The self, the ego and the consciousness are related but different concepts, all of them pointing to a reality that can't be computed with words. Because all rational thinking is computation and hence incomplete. Reality > (True+False)

[splinter @splinte04728]

@giacomozucco @Jestopher_BTC Improvements in hardware and software optmz will also scale Bitcoin.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @OrwellNGoode mayonnaise is great. very popular here in germany.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @seanpk that's easy... first you try out all the longevity providers and their products. then you go with the one that tells you, that you will live the longest. the longer they say you will live, the more money you give them because its worth more. cant go wrong here. #justworks

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @elonmuskADO My interpretation of this is that you think that as long as I don't believe in God, I don't understand logic, because if I understood logic I would also have to believe in God. Correct?

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @elonmuskADO I can imagine a God that if I believed in him, would make my imagination of Him a proof of His existence. I can also imagine axioms, which I can build arguments upon. Maybe those axioms are true, maybe not. They are not true just because I made them up.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @elonmuskADO Yes this must logically be true, if you believe in something that is like God is. If you don't, it's also possible to believe that God was only something you imagined and this would not be logically inconsistent either (whereas it would be inconsistent with believing in God).

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @elonmuskADO I appreciate your logical consistency and I agree that if you believe in God, this must be so. If you don't believe in God, then you no longer must believe that this is true. It reminds me a bit of axioms in math, but I fully understand and respect that if you don't.

[splinter @splinte04728]

@LukeDashjr @elonmuskADO I agree that this is true if God is not just a figure of your imagination. If you believe God exists, then logic proofs of God can be created. If God is imagined only, it is no longer proofs.