Michael is a liar. He does no research, misrepresents real academics, gets the most basic facts wrong, all while shoving his degree in your face as his only source. It is embarrassing and absolutely disgraceful. @MichaelButtonX
https://t.co/foQ94aYzIK
@DrHughT@farmer_tr Absolutely did! Was in conversation with Prof. van der Blom, and also (and primarily) Dr. William Mack, who is the head of department.
Been a couple of months since I helped researched this for him, but I'm glad to see Dave is finally releasing his video on Michael Button. (Soon).
Hint hint: It's very in-depth and exposes him completely.
@Roderickrodder@MichaelButtonX That is an independent paper by Alberto Donini. Not credible and shows no proof behind that claim. And also, not one of the people you just mentioned.
@Roderickrodder@MichaelButtonX Care to share a link to these very credible "loads of pictures" that Hancock and Schoch (who believes these ruts may have been caused by a solar event by the way) shared that prove they extend hundreds of meters below the sea?
@Roderickrodder@MichaelButtonX Taking after Michael using real academics and citing them for something they never said, I see. No. Schaefer, Pearson, or even Mottershead document that. At all.
@Roderickrodder@MichaelButtonX They don't. And yes, I would love that. Go ahead. Just remember, you need to back up your claims. For example, where do the cart ruts extend hundreds of meters under the sea, and what is your source?
@Roderickrodder@MichaelButtonX And you're still not explaining how I lied. If you prefer, I can give you many examples of Michael lying just in that one video if you wish?
@farmer_tr So am I! I wrote over 20 pages of information for him so I am interested to see what he ends up including and what not.
Even got to the point where I had a great conversation with Dr. William Mack from Button's university about what he was claiming to have been taught.
@MichaelButtonX Or like the one where you said you have "enormous respect for archaeologists", got criticised for it, then deleted? Because you're a coward and don't actually respect archaeologists. You just lie on the internet about them and their work for money and attention.
@MichaelButtonX Cute. Want to actually respond to anything this time? Or are you going to continue to be a coward as usual? I'm going to bet on the latter.
Also going to end up deleting this post like all others you get criticism for, like this one?
@BobSonders@Gnosisinformant@MichaelButtonX Sure, and some archaeologists argue that same point - that they may have been there before. Just most of the evidence that we do currently have points towards Imperial Rome.
@Urie219184@MichaelButtonX You're right, but that has nothing to do with why it is called the Stone Age. The three-age system was created as a museum classification method to organize artefacts, primarily weapons and tools. Not structures. Stone weapons/tools came first, then bronze, then iron.
@Chipm761@MichaelButtonX You are arguing for a point I never made. Michael was wrong about why it is called the Stone Age. I corrected him. Where did I mention anything else that you're talking about? What recent finds disprove why it was called the Stone Age?
@MichaelButtonX Again. Preservation bias is not why it is called the Stone Age. Preservation explains what survives. Periodization explains what the age is called. You are confusing archaeology with taphonomy.
Do you understand why the three-age system is named that way?