@sine_nomine88 You play the race card because you have no coherent argument. Or the intelligence to form one.
Listening to rich people whine and bitch about being victims is enough to disgust anyone with more than two firing neurons between their ears.
@ChrisDJackson "competency and decency"π€£
I know your followers are a bunch of brain dead morons, but the rest of us have a memory somewhat longer than an addled goldfish.
@AmberWoods100 And yet you have the nerve to post "I'm not on the left".
I know, I'd be embarrassed to admit it too, but that doesn't make you less of a PoS for lying about it.
@35and5 It fits reality, dumbass. You lack the mental capacity to determine if something is true or not on your own. No wonder libs fall for everything dumbass thing that flies across the internet.
you keep switching from the specific (context unknown) to the general (grain of salt).
You seem to finally agree that what initiated the event IS important to context.
And when that important part of the context is left out, anyone with more than 2 firing neurons between ears would see that it is on the fishy side, to put it lightly.
Or, you know, just blather out the "grain of salt" canard and call it a day.
@35and5 Or back to the koi pond example. Trump DOES look like a fool just dumping the whole sack of fish food into the pond, doesn't he?
Until you see the initiating event, the Japanese Prime Minister dumping his in first.
So yeah, it freakin' matters.
@35and5 Its like cutting off the beginning of the Zapruder film and claiming that Kennedy's head spontaneously exploded.
The part with the bullet, to you, doesn't matter.
@35and5 Knowing what initiated the event IS part of the context. How could it not be?
I guess its not only if you truly don't understand the concept, or you're playing outrageously stupid in order to have any argument at all.
@Heccles94 Try reading the restrictions in Article 8. Basically the government can revoke these 'rights' for any number of bullshit reasons. Therefore they're not 'rights', they're privileges granted by the government.
You're the one assuming without the full context, like what happened in the prior 10 seconds that caused the cop to come after her. Was she rushing the cop or standing there peacefully? If she was standing peacefully, why not show that?
I've seen 6 year olds that could critically analyze information better than you.
@35and5 You DO understand the concept of "context", right?
I guess Rosalyn Carter should have been investigated for hanging out with mass murderers and cannibals! I have evidence! Such a horrible, horrible woman.