Sputt76🚀

Patiently waiting.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@jazzicoop @digitalassetbuy When Jazzi talks, people listen

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👊🏻

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@EricLDaugh Not a fan of Jay the 🐍 Clayton. What does Trump see in him?

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy 😂😂

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@beyond_broke Grok is this new news

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@Xfinancebull @DigPerspectives Hope she’s right this time but she has a history of not speaking up when she could - maybe a weak spine

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@cowboycrypto313 😂😂😂

[John E Deaton @JohnEDeaton1]

Hey @Sen_Alsobrooks - along with every Democrat who argues they can’t vote for the Clarity Act unless state Attorneys General are in charge of the ethics enforcement: You’re suggesting is what’s unserious.

I’ve never been shy about criticizing this President when I think he’s gotten it wrong, including on crypto policy, where I’ve pushed back on positions I believed were bad for retail investors and market integrity. But on this specific question, the Democrats’ insistence on state Attorneys General enforcement doesn’t hold up.

The CLARITY Act is federal legislation establishing a federal regulatory framework for digital assets. The Department of Justice - not fifty different state AGs with fifty different political incentives and fifty different interpretations - is the appropriate body to enforce federal law.

Handing enforcement to state AGs invites exactly the kind of inconsistent, patchwork application that makes it harder for legitimate market participants to know what the rules actually are, while opening the door to the kind of politicized targeting we’ve already seen state AGs use against industries and individuals they simply disagree with.

If Democrats are serious about consumer protection in crypto markets, they should want uniform, predictable federal enforcement - not a system where enforcement varies depending on which state you’re in and which party controls that AG’s office.

Currently, there are no restrictions on government officials issuing meme coins, NFTs, or other cryptocurrencies. FTX happened in part because of the lack of regulatory clarity in America and retail investors lost big time going offshore.

Make no mistake about it: voting no comes down to not wanting Trump to take a legislative victory lap shortly before the midterms. Period. And it’s disgusting, un-patriotic and hurts the people you’re claiming to want to protect.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy Unfortunately he’s trying to sell you something

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy If the clarity act being passed doesn’t move us in the right direction with utility adoption and more value for XRP then tell me what we get told is the next driver we will be fed.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy True, something ain’t right.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@SMQKEDQG @DigPerspectives Are you suggesting retail investors are to blame for market volatility?

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@MinusWells @DigPerspectives Minus Brain

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@sentosumosaba @The_DTCC And…….

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@BankXRP They don’t ask for the physical $ to be banned though

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@xrpmemeguy True dat

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@BankXRP I’m sorry but she’s not fit for her role. All talk and no action.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@DigPerspectives @patrickbetdavid @joerogan @JamieVernon @TuckerCarlson @JohnEDeaton1 John needs to put on some weight - he looks gaunt

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@beyond_broke You’ve got to say something, I guess.

[Sputt76🚀 @sputt76]

@ChadSteingraber Thesis????