Squizer

Building systems that actually remember you

[Squizer @squizerx]

99% OF CLAUDE CODE USERS WASTE HOURS REBUILDING CONTEXT. HERE'S THE FIX.

you know this feeling

you're deep into fixing a bug

Claude has all the context

then it fills up

you clear the conversation

and start from scratch

rebuilding everything

wasting tokens

wasting time

every single session

there's a simple trick to revert your context back to exactly where you were before Claude started failing

no rebuilding

no wasted tokens

no starting over

this is one of 40 workflows i tested over 3 weeks on real projects

the full list is in my article below 👇

[Squizer @squizerx]

https://t.co/hbTCutbmQs

[Squizer @squizerx]

EVERYONE COPIES KARPATHY'S METHOD.
ALMOST NOBODY BUILDS THE 3 JOBS THAT MAKE IT WORK.

The wiki is just the visible part.
The 3 scheduled jobs are what actually keep it alive.

→ Daily Ingest (12:30 AM)
clippings, notes, voice memos → sorted, filed, wiki-linked

→ Nightly Review (2:00 AM)
daily notes + lessons learned → dashboards refreshed, memory updated

→ Weekly Vault Review (Sat 8 PM)
finds what's missing, queues research gaps

Without these three — your vault becomes a graveyard in a month.

The real unlock is how you split the work:

→ What I do
→ What my agent does
→ What we both do

Clear split. Zero overlap. Zero dropped context.

Full A–Z system 👇

What's the one thing you keep meaning to review in your notes but never actually do?

[Squizer @squizerx]

EVERYONE COPIES KARPATHY'S METHOD.
ALMOST NOBODY BUILDS THE 3 JOBS THAT MAKE IT WORK.

The wiki is just the visible part.
The 3 scheduled jobs are what actually keep it alive.

→ Daily Ingest (12:30 AM)
clippings, notes, voice memos → sorted, filed, wiki-linked

→ Nightly Review (2:00 AM)
daily notes + lessons learned → dashboards refreshed, memory updated

→ Weekly Vault Review (Sat 8 PM)
finds what's missing, queues research gaps

Without these three — your vault becomes a graveyard in a month.

The real unlock is how you split the work:

→ What I do
→ What my agent does
→ What we both do

Clear split. Zero overlap. Zero dropped context.

Full A–Z system 👇

What's the one thing you keep meaning to review in your notes but never actually do?

[Yarchi @undefinedKi]

https://t.co/KADozFhjGF

[Squizer @squizerx]

15 CLAUDE CHEAT CODES TESTED. ONLY 6 SURVIVED. THE REST ARE JUST NAMED INSTRUCTIONS.

Someone ran 15 viral Claude "cheat codes" against the same question, asked normally.

9 of them died.

→ Type BEASTMODE alone → Claude asks what you want help with
→ GODMODE → same thing, no mode activated
→ FIRST PRINCIPLES → returned 6 causes vs 8 from a plain question

The truth: there are no secret modes. Just instructions with a name attached.

The 4 that actually held up:

→ Pre-mortem
→ Red team
→ Steel man
→ ELI5

Because they're real prompting techniques — not magic words.

If you've been typing "BEASTMODE" for months — you were just talking to yourself.

Which cheat code have you been using that you now realize was doing nothing?

[Squizer @squizerx]

15 CLAUDE CHEAT CODES TESTED. ONLY 6 SURVIVED. THE REST ARE JUST NAMED INSTRUCTIONS.

Someone ran 15 viral Claude "cheat codes" against the same question, asked normally.

9 of them died.

→ Type BEASTMODE alone → Claude asks what you want help with
→ GODMODE → same thing, no mode activated
→ FIRST PRINCIPLES → returned 6 causes vs 8 from a plain question

The truth: there are no secret modes. Just instructions with a name attached.

The 4 that actually held up:

→ Pre-mortem
→ Red team
→ Steel man
→ ELI5

Because they're real prompting techniques — not magic words.

If you've been typing "BEASTMODE" for months — you were just talking to yourself.

Which cheat code have you been using that you now realize was doing nothing?

[Squizer @squizerx]

@ca_techiegray Exactly — that’s the whole point. One memory layer, different models.

[Squizer @squizerx]

YOU'VE BEEN RE-EXPLAINING YOURSELF TO CLAUDE AND CHATGPT FOR YEARS. HERE'S THE FIX.

Every time you switch AI models — you start from zero.

Same context. Same background. Same project.
Typed out again. And again. And again.

There's no reason for that anymore.

→ Create a free Walrus memory account
→ Connect it to Claude, tell it to remember something
→ Open ChatGPT — it already knows the answer

One shared memory across every AI you use.
Encrypted. Under your control. You decide what each model sees.

Not switching models.
Switching how they work together.

How many hours have you wasted re-explaining your project to a new AI?

[kai @0xkkai]

https://t.co/JQY6hCnPiZ

[Squizer @squizerx]

YOU'VE BEEN RE-EXPLAINING YOURSELF TO CLAUDE AND CHATGPT FOR YEARS. HERE'S THE FIX.

Every time you switch AI models — you start from zero.

Same context. Same background. Same project.
Typed out again. And again. And again.

There's no reason for that anymore.

→ Create a free Walrus memory account
→ Connect it to Claude, tell it to remember something
→ Open ChatGPT — it already knows the answer

One shared memory across every AI you use.
Encrypted. Under your control. You decide what each model sees.

Not switching models.
Switching how they work together.

How many hours have you wasted re-explaining your project to a new AI?

[Squizer @squizerx]

SOMEONE JUST TURNED APPLE'S DESIGN LANGUAGE INTO A CLAUDE SKILL. YOUR WEBSITE HAS NO EXCUSE NOW

Most people tell Claude: "make this look premium.

And get generic AI-looking output every time.

Because Claude has no design standards to follow.

Now it does.

→ Drop the skill into Claude
→ Point it at your existing website
→ Get an audit based on Apple's actual design rules
→ Not "copy how Apple looks" — but why it looks that good

The best part isn't building new sites with it.

It's fixing the one you already have.

Claude will catch dozens of details you never noticed were off.

What's the one thing about your website that's been bugging you but you can't fix?

[Squizer @squizerx]

SOMEONE JUST TURNED APPLE'S DESIGN LANGUAGE INTO A CLAUDE SKILL. YOUR WEBSITE HAS NO EXCUSE NOW

Most people tell Claude: "make this look premium.

And get generic AI-looking output every time.

Because Claude has no design standards to follow.

Now it does.

→ Drop the skill into Claude
→ Point it at your existing website
→ Get an audit based on Apple's actual design rules
→ Not "copy how Apple looks" — but why it looks that good

The best part isn't building new sites with it.

It's fixing the one you already have.

Claude will catch dozens of details you never noticed were off.

What's the one thing about your website that's been bugging you but you can't fix?

[Squizer @squizerx]

CLAUDE ANSWERS LIKE IT'S PAID BY THE WORD. THIS ONE SKILL FIXES IT.

You ask a simple question.

You get a 500-word essay.

You hunt through it to find the actual answer.

Claude doesn't just write long.

It locks onto its first idea and defends it the entire session.

Here's what the skill does:

→ Splits Claude into 5 sub-agents that never see each other

→ Forces completely different frames. Zero anchoring

→ 3 critic agents score every option and name the traps

→ You get the answer the original Claude would never have chosen

Short list. Clear recommendation. First step included.

Not more Claude.

Better Claude.

What's the longest, most convoluted Claude answer you've ever gotten?

[Squizer @squizerx]

CLAUDE ANSWERS LIKE IT'S PAID BY THE WORD. THIS ONE SKILL FIXES IT.

You ask a simple question.

You get a 500-word essay.

You hunt through it to find the actual answer.

Claude doesn't just write long.

It locks onto its first idea and defends it the entire session.

Here's what the skill does:

→ Splits Claude into 5 sub-agents that never see each other

→ Forces completely different frames. Zero anchoring

→ 3 critic agents score every option and name the traps

→ You get the answer the original Claude would never have chosen

Short list. Clear recommendation. First step included.

Not more Claude.

Better Claude.

What's the longest, most convoluted Claude answer you've ever gotten?

[Squizer @squizerx]

WE SPENT 2 YEARS TREATING CLAUDE LIKE IT'S DUMB. ANTHROPIC JUST TOLD US TO STOP.

The old way (what almost everyone still does): rules, examples, everything upfront, repeat yourself, memory in CLAUDE.md.

The new way — 6 shifts from Anthropic:

→ Give judgment, not rules
→ Design interfaces, not examples
→ Use progressive disclosure, not everything upfront
→ Simple tool descriptions, not repetition
→ Auto-memory, not manual CLAUDE.md
→ Rich references (HTML artifacts), not simple specs

The skill isn't writing the perfect prompt anymore.
It's designing an environment Claude can navigate on its own.

Which of these 6 shifts hits hardest for you?

Full breakdown from Anthropic below

[Squizer @squizerx]

WE SPENT 2 YEARS TREATING CLAUDE LIKE IT'S DUMB. ANTHROPIC JUST TOLD US TO STOP.

The old way (what almost everyone still does): rules, examples, everything upfront, repeat yourself, memory in CLAUDE.md.

The new way — 6 shifts from Anthropic:

→ Give judgment, not rules
→ Design interfaces, not examples
→ Use progressive disclosure, not everything upfront
→ Simple tool descriptions, not repetition
→ Auto-memory, not manual CLAUDE.md
→ Rich references (HTML artifacts), not simple specs

The skill isn't writing the perfect prompt anymore.
It's designing an environment Claude can navigate on its own.

Which of these 6 shifts hits hardest for you?

Full breakdown from Anthropic below

[Thariq @trq212]

We removed ~80% of the Claude Code system prompt for our newest models, this is what we've learned about writing system prompts, skills and Claude.MDs for them. https://t.co/6DZwSrZjE9

[Squizer @squizerx]

ANTHROPIC DELETED 80% OF CLAUDE'S SYSTEM PROMPT. AND CLAUDE GOT SMARTER.

Anthropic just published what should actually stay in your CLAUDE.md — and it's way less than you think.

Here's what changed:

→ Most hard-coded rules — gone
→ Model now decides what context to load itself
→ Progressive disclosure through skills > massive CLAUDE.md files
→ Independent research: same model + less context can match Opus performance

If your CLAUDE.md is 400+ lines — you're making Claude worse, not better.

Time to strip it down.

Full breakdown from Anthropic 👇

How long is your CLAUDE.md right now?

[Squizer @squizerx]

ANTHROPIC DELETED 80% OF CLAUDE'S SYSTEM PROMPT. AND CLAUDE GOT SMARTER.

Anthropic just published what should actually stay in your CLAUDE.md — and it's way less than you think.

Here's what changed:

→ Most hard-coded rules — gone
→ Model now decides what context to load itself
→ Progressive disclosure through skills > massive CLAUDE.md files
→ Independent research: same model + less context can match Opus performance

If your CLAUDE.md is 400+ lines — you're making Claude worse, not better.

Time to strip it down.

Full breakdown from Anthropic 👇

How long is your CLAUDE.md right now?

[Thariq @trq212]

We removed ~80% of the Claude Code system prompt for our newest models, this is what we've learned about writing system prompts, skills and Claude.MDs for them. https://t.co/6DZwSrZjE9

[Squizer @squizerx]

YOU'RE WASTING 70% OF YOUR CLAUDE TOKENS.
THIS 3-STEP FIX CHANGES THAT.

Most people feed Claude the same context over and over.

Every single session.

From scratch.

Here's the fix:

→ Step 1: Install Graphify in your terminal
→ Step 2: It builds a knowledge graph from all your notes
→ Step 3: Add the query instructions to your CLAUDE.md

Now Claude reads the graph — not your entire vault.

70% less tokens.

Same output.

Second brain that actually scales.

Full A–Z guide in the article below 👇

Try it today and reply with how many tokens you saved.

[Squizer @squizerx]

YOU'RE WASTING 70% OF YOUR CLAUDE TOKENS.
THIS 3-STEP FIX CHANGES THAT.

Most people feed Claude the same context over and over.

Every single session.

From scratch.

Here's the fix:

→ Step 1: Install Graphify in your terminal
→ Step 2: It builds a knowledge graph from all your notes
→ Step 3: Add the query instructions to your CLAUDE.md

Now Claude reads the graph — not your entire vault.

70% less tokens.

Same output.

Second brain that actually scales.

Full A–Z guide in the article below 👇

Try it today and reply with how many tokens you saved.

[Kirill @kirillk_web3]

https://t.co/IscgkTMDM9

[Squizer @squizerx]

105,000 PEOPLE BOOKMARKED KARPATHY'S SECOND BRAIN. ALMOST NONE ACTUALLY BUILT IT.

And I get why.

Every second brain ends the same way:
You open Obsidian → start linking notes → graveyard in 3 weeks.

The problem isn’t the tool.
The problem is you still have to be the librarian.

Here’s what Karpathy figured out:

→ 3 folders. 1 file.
→ Dump everything. Don’t organise a single thing.
→ Claude reads it, links it, and builds the wiki for you.

Day 1: stupidly simple
Day 100: a compounding second brain no one else can copy

I built mine in 45 minutes on a Saturday morning.

Full A-Z breakdown (how to set this up with Claude) 👇

Have you tried building a second brain before — what killed it for you?

[Squizer @squizerx]

105,000 PEOPLE BOOKMARKED KARPATHY'S SECOND BRAIN. ALMOST NONE ACTUALLY BUILT IT.

And I get why.

Every second brain ends the same way:
You open Obsidian → start linking notes → graveyard in 3 weeks.

The problem isn’t the tool.
The problem is you still have to be the librarian.

Here’s what Karpathy figured out:

→ 3 folders. 1 file.
→ Dump everything. Don’t organise a single thing.
→ Claude reads it, links it, and builds the wiki for you.

Day 1: stupidly simple
Day 100: a compounding second brain no one else can copy

I built mine in 45 minutes on a Saturday morning.

Full A-Z breakdown (how to set this up with Claude) 👇

Have you tried building a second brain before — what killed it for you?

[Kirill @kirillk_web3]

https://t.co/IscgkTMDM9