I wrote a feature for @WIRED about the fascinating rebels who believe the guardrails imposed on AI models are a dangerous form of censorship and control. By "abliterating" open models to remove refusals, these renegades want to make AI truly free--despite the dangers this brings. https://t.co/bsMBVo4s3B
@EkaRobotics has raised a $150M Series A.
Generality v/s Performance is the fundamental tension at the frontier of robotics. Generality without performance is just a prototype. Performance without generality is just a single-purpose tool.
Customers shouldn’t have to choose. Eka breaks the tradeoff. Powered by our Vision-Force-Action (VFA) model, we deliver the performance and versatility customers need to put robots to work every day.
Eka is built on three convictions:
⚡️Force is the language of manipulation.
🚀 Reinforcement learning is how dexterous manipulation scales.
🎂 System 1—fast, reliable physical execution—is the bottleneck to solve.
With this funding, we will scale our model and accelerate customer deployments.
Grateful to be building alongside a dream team and investors who share our ambition.
Can a robot assemble tight-clearance parts using only its proprioception? No camera, no tactile sensor, no F/T sensor, no joint torque sensing, no priors over the object geometries or poses: just joint position readings.
It actually can! Blind policies trained in simulation insert pegs, mesh gears, and thread nuts, and the peg policy works zero-shot in the real world. Here's what we found 🧵
Joint work with @BronarsToni, my wonderful co-first author, who's on the job market right now! Advised by @kushalk_ and @pulkitology.
@__0xhorror__ RL over the course of many human generations is really broad, generalization isn't a fact about RL but rather the curriculum distribution
(1/6) From @GoogleDeepmind’s AlphaGo to AlphaZero, we saw machines find moves that reached beyond what we’d imagined for them. No one taught them those strategies. They emerged from reinforcement learning: playing, failing, and trying again under a single binary task reward for success or failure. Inspired by them, we couldn’t help but wonder: what might a robot discover if we gave it that same freedom to learn?
That question led us to AlphaNIST. Starting tabula rasa, with that same binary reward plus only a simple control cost, a single policy solves all 20 @NIST assembly tasks at a 98.2% success rate in simulation. More surprising still, AlphaNIST can complete 10 different tasks in a row, receiving that reward only once, after all 10 are done.
Just as AlphaGo’s strategies surprised its creators, AlphaNIST discovered dexterous strategies we couldn’t have come up with ourselves.
Paper: https://t.co/HZBYgG7SWK
Website: https://t.co/VyUKiYFI2y
@waterloo_intern it probably depends on the number of such tasks + exact kind of backtracking computation being done, even though both require backtracking the concrete trajectory checking algorithm would be different so you need enough tasks to interpolate between backtracking algorithms
(1/5) Everyone says dexterous manipulation needs real-world data. These policies were trained with none. Our robots mesh gears, thread nuts, and insert pegs zero-shot from RGB, and the same recipe works for locomotion across terrains much harder than before.
The missing piece wasn't a better RL algorithm, but a small tweak to what the robot practices.
Today we're releasing Success-Guided Sampling (SGS), a simple change to the task sampler that unlocks new levels of dexterity and agility with large-scale, end-to-end sim2real RL.
No demonstrations, no per-task reward tuning. Just PPO at scale.
Check out the policies yourself at https://t.co/dnwUr0tabh! All videos at 1x speed! 🧵 🔈
hundreds of MI355x and B300 nodes
now live on https://t.co/t0uE0bekz3
subsidized for all .edu and .govs
it’s time to scale the frontier ecosystem
for the public benefit
Doing proper science in robotics is hard, because human demonstrations are expensive and less controllable.
OCBench is a new benchmark providing "human-like" scripted policies. This enables scientific studies of BC and RL with virtually unlimited data!
@zzigakovacic Amazing work! From the examples, it seems like Astra favors scripted motions while Opus favors more general simulation based solutions. What happens under perturbed conditions - how do agent solutions generalize?