Ask the right ?s. Fight confirmation bias, in yourself first. Let's revisit that incredibly emotionally driven opinion of yours in hindsight, shall we?
Belfast Tonight. Britain Tomorrow. The Trajectory Is Set.
On Monday night a man was pinned to a residential street in north Belfast and stabbed repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened. One used a hurling stick. By Tuesday night three houses and a Middle Eastern supermarket were burning. Infants were carried from neighbouring properties. A police vehicle was set alight. Politicians called for calm.
Remember this night. Not because it is exceptional. Because it is not.
This is where the road leads. Not in twenty years. Now. Belfast has experienced serious immigration-related disorder for three consecutive years. The same cycle every time. Attack. Outrage. Disorder. Calls for calm. Nothing. The next incident. What is playing out in Belfast is not a malfunction. It is the destination. A state that cannot name the cause manages the consequence instead, and calls it governance.
Now project forward. Not with imagination. With arithmetic. Over 200,000 people have arrived by small boat since 2018. The majority are unvetted young men from countries with no cultural alignment with the host society. They are housed in communities without consent. Dispersed without warning. The removal rate is four percent. The government knows the other ninety-six percent are staying. It has decided to manage that fact rather than reverse it. Every year the number grows. Every year the concentration deepens. Every year the friction increases.
In ten years those concentrations will not be streets. They will be districts. In twenty years they will be cities within cities, governed by parallel authority, answering to parallel loyalties. We have watched this happen in France. The banlieues were built accommodation by accommodation, retreat by retreat, until the French state no longer entered them except in force. Britain is on the same road, travelling faster.
The trigger events will multiply. One policing incident. One foreign conflict landing on a British street. One court case, one arrest, one viral video. Any spark will do because the kindling has been laid by policy and left to dry by neglect. The riots will not be contained to one city for one night. They will spread, as they spread in France, as they spread across England last summer, because the grievance is not local. It is national. And the anger on both sides will harden with every cycle.
Public order will not hold at current trajectory. The police already negotiate where they once enforced. Investigations are quietly dropped. Reports go unfiled. The state keeps the peace by lowering the bar for what constitutes peace. That bar will keep falling because the alternative requires confronting what the political class has spent thirty years refusing to confront.
The political system will bend to the new demography. It already has. Candidates selected on foreign conflicts. Councils controlled by sectarian bloc voting. Representatives answering to communal leaderships rather than constituents. That process will accelerate as the demographic weight shifts.
And somewhere in this trajectory a trigger event will occur that cannot be managed. A mass casualty attack. A riot that becomes an insurrection. A video so barbaric it breaks the remaining political consensus around managed silence. After that the response will be less controlled, less proportionate and less reversible than anything a government could have delivered by acting fifteen years earlier when the choice still existed.
Britain is not sleepwalking into this. The eyes are wide open. The trajectory is known. The choices being made are deliberate. Every week that passes without a closed border, a functioning removal system and an honest political reckoning is a week in which the future described above becomes more certain and less avoidable.
Belfast on Monday night is not a warning. The warnings came years ago and were ignored. Belfast on Monday night is the bill beginning to arrive.
@AdonaiOnGaia It's obviously supposed to be a view from the north pole, with southern hemisphere land masses appearing as a thin sliver of their actual size due to the intended viewpoint.
Your confirmation bias has you assuming ridiculousness in order to justify your existing ridiculousness.
FACT CHECK: "Senior" reporter at MS Now, @janestreet says: "There is no evidence of election fraud in California."
What are you talking about? Have you not done any research?
The DOJ just prosecuted a LA woman named Brenda Brown for paying people to register to vote using fake addresses. My team filmed this fraud happening all over Skid Row on multiple days & occasions.
Instead of sitting in your journalist cubicle at MS Now all day and peddling lazy propaganda, go into the field and investigate voter fraud on Skid Row like my team did.
The mainstream media continues to lie and we have officially issued a retraction to MS Now for their false statements about "no evidence of election fraud in California."
I love when the rebuttal to the case is presented inside the case itself. In this case listing the number of people who were killed, how long it was before help arrived, and the condition the ship was in when the attack stopped. If Israel wanted there to be no survivors as Massie says, all they had to do was sink the ship. All they had to do was keep attacking.
He presents his case as thought Israel did not have the capacity to sink a ship somehow.
When you debunk your own case while you're making your case, it's derangement, idiocy, malice or profit motive that keeps you going.
Anyone's guess which applies to Massie.
What I take may not be what you take. Learn about it. Talk to a good naturopathic doctor about it. I'm not a fan of anyone taking something just because someone else does. Too many people don't know or understand their own body. While this isn't a drug, it's a plant product, too much of a good thing is still bad, and you need to know if your body might have a pre-existing allergy response or similar, before taking it.
Personally, I take 2-4 capsules, with food, up to twice a day. Not every day, but as needed.
I understand that you want to find distinction without a difference because you really dislike the person currently holding the office. You replied to my message which basically said the same thing. Two things can both be true, the only reason this discussion continued is because some of you really hate the fact that Trump is the one currently in that position, and it doesn't matter what he does, including something as simple as showing respect for the country, which he does on a regular basis, it inflames the derangement syndrome to the point of silly semantics arguments.
Screeching that he shouldn't be saluting during the national anthem because he's not an active military position is the stupidest of all positions, MANY presidents have done it for both the national anthem and when returning the salute given to them by active duty personnel on a daily basis, for centuries, and of course it's going to get the response that it got from hundreds of people.
If this is the hill you want to make yourself look like a fool on, have at it. Personally, I think you're more intelligent than that. Have a good day, try to enjoy some sunshine and fresh grass today. You're better than trying to make an argument out of this.
Two things can both be true.
Don't ever expect big pharma to admit that something more natural and less expensive than their products actually works better, or with fewer side effects.
And doctors are regularly bribed by pharma to suggest and prescribe certain medications too. Their word is not golden.
Be just as skeptical of the industry that is arguably responsible for the third leading cause of death in the US, medical errors and malpractice, according to multiple studies.
@Kaoru3399@WallStreetApes I'm just glad you got the important, beneficial and useful part of the message, and didn't get hung up on your understanding of the minutia.
@Philippe_Tweets Did you only read one sentence? I fully explained the nature of his elected position. And two things can both be true. The top position in the military is an elected civilian position, as defined in Article 2 Section 2 of the US Constitution. Try hard not to be so obtuse.
I'm only wrong if you choose to define "active military" the exact same as "active duty military".
There's a difference, and that difference is defined in the office of the President, which is both a civilian role, yet also the Commander in Chief of the military, the top position in the military.
In other words, this is a stupid argument to be making just because you dislike the man, and the fact he saluted during the national anthem, just like he often returns the salutes of military personnel who salute him, as their commander. It's a sign of respect.
Get over yourself.
@theOGLindy@FrankLuntz He's the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. The military Chiefs of Staff report directly to him. Are you really that stupid?
@theOGLindy@FrankLuntz He's the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. The military Chiefs of Staff report directly to him. Are you really that stupid?
RFK Jr. tells Theo Von about the Monsanto trial, where an EPA official was caught asking for a “gold medal” to kill a study that showed Roundup caused cancer.
The jury was so angry, they awarded the plaintiffs more money than they asked for.
It all started when a married couple of home gardeners were both diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma at the same time. Their Labrador retriever got it, too. The dog died.
RFK Jr. asked the jury for $1 billion.
Then he showed them the emails…
RFK JR: “We asked the jury for a billion dollars. They gave us 2.2 billion.”
“And they did that because we were able to show them documents that showed Monsanto knew of the danger and then worked with corrupt officials — a guy called Jess Rowland inside of EPA, who was the head of the pesticide division.”
“They had deliberately concealed the science, fixed the science. And now the big study that they used to prove safety has been retracted.”
THEO: “They’d found emails that it was kind of ghostwritten or something?”
RFK JR: “The head of the pesticide division — Monsanto asked him secretly, and now we have these emails — to kill a study by another agency called ATSDR.”
“And he said, ‘I can’t kill it. That’s not my agency. I can kill them in EPA, but not outside.’”
“And they said, ‘You got to do it. We can’t have this study go forward.’ And he said, ‘Okay, I’m going to do it, but if I succeed, you got to give me a gold medal.’”
THEO VON: “A gold medal in what? Just anything?”
RFK JR: “A gold medal for killing a study that showed that it caused cancer.”
THEO VON: “That’s insane! It’s at a contest level now. Things like that are so prolific that now there are awards for it. It seems baffling.”
@SNL_Atlanta@FrankLuntz@elonmusk Frank will continue to make this same proclamation until a court proves him wrong. This is how he keeps his valuable leftist contacts sharing info with him.
That's been his MO for 15+ years now. He's become quite predictable now.
@Southerntwig@grok@RealAlexJones I prefer to stick with facts backed up by evidence, rather than suspicious innuendo backed up by a general distrust for anything Jewish.
A bit disappointed in your responses to this simple request. They are easily available, but some steeped in their cognitive dissonance will refuse to acknowledge anything from another X user, usually accompanied by name calling and slander.
@grok please verify the validity of these images, and provide the translation of the Jewish plaque inscription. Also, verify the validity of the US intelligence gathering showing the Israeli pilots did in fact believe the ship was Egyptian in the moment, as shown in their radio comms, as well as the fact they believe the Liberty to be 80+ miles further away, not on the middle of the war zone.