Sushil Kumar Kabra

Chartered Accountant

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

Court Fees has to be in parity of Income Tax Tribunal
Also GST Is based on turnover so the amount involved and stake involved are very high and large in number

The CBIC need to recheck the number and make the Justice more affordable for small taxpayers

[Jatin @jatin_jcss]

Minimum #GSTAT filing fee of Rs.5,000 per appeal very high for small taxpayers.

Many have suffered 12 orders per year to multiply min. penalty of Rs.10,000 per SCN.

@FinMinIndia @cbic_india pls. reduce to Rs.500 per #APL5.

Fee not source of revenue. It hinders right of appeal.

[GST Appellate Tribunal @GSTATofficial]

📢 Important Update for Taxpayers & Stakeholders

The last date for filing appeals/applications before GSTAT in eligible cases has been notified as 31st July 2026.

Do not wait for the last date! File your appeals now to avoid delays and last-minute rush.

#GSTAT #eFiling #GST

[CA Bimal Jain @BimalGST]

GSTAT Portal glitches put thousands of appeals at risk; experts seek deadline extension

Read More at: https://t.co/k7UfEBEID0

@GSTATofficial

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

@Sahar393815 14
1 father
1 mother
11 son
1 sister

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

@Simi_2210_ 41

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

@SqSehrish 2

[GST Reckoner®_CA (Adv) Gaurav Agrawal @GSTReckoner]

🚨 The @GSTATofficial portal has slowed down drastically, making it incredibly difficult for appellants to file appeals before the June 30 deadline.

With no sign of an extension from the Govt, we know @gstat can't change the date—but we urgently request tech intervention to ensure smooth portal functioning! 👇
#GSTAT #GST #Taxpayers #GSTAppeal

[Dr(Hc) Krishna Mohan AVS @avs_mohan]

@nsitharamanoffc @cbic_india @askGST_GoI Kindly extend the due date for filing of GSTAT appeals till 15/7/2026. Many technical issues are coming while filing the appeals. Kindly consider our request.

[Dr(Hc) Krishna Mohan AVS @avs_mohan]

@nsitharamanoffc @Infosys_GSTN @askGST_GoI Kindly extend the due date for filing of GSTAT appeals till 15/7/2026. Stakeholders are facing Many technical issues while filing the appeals. Kindly consider and extend the due date as requested.

[anand mahindra @anandmahindra]

Winning against the Chinese. In China.

At the Asian Relay Championships.

Srabani, Sudeshna, Sneha & Tamanna in the 4x100 relay.

Power. Speed. Grace. Commitment.

But above all, teamwork.

This clip has it all.

I’m watching it on loop.

More of this please. 🇮🇳

[Tax Guru @taxguru_in]

The Advocates Tax Bar Association has urged the Finance Minister to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 Dec 2026, citing portal glitches like Aadhaar authentication failures, DSC errors, payment delays, and upload issues that hinder taxpayers' statutory right to appeal. https://t.co/nfkfwvUYSC

[CA Bimal Jain @BimalGST]

ITC can not be denied, based solely on retrospective cancellation of supplier's GST registration

🎥 Watch Short Video: https://t.co/4uNrJj3MOt

• The Madras High Court held that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied solely because the supplier’s GST registration was cancelled retrospectively. Where the supplier was a validly registered taxpayer on the date of the transaction, retrospective cancellation by itself is not sufficient to reject the recipient’s ITC claim.

• The Court observed that the impugned orders primarily relied on the retrospective cancellation of the supplier’s registration, without independently examining whether the underlying supplies were genuine and actually received by the recipient. Such an approach was held to be legally unsustainable.

• Reaffirming its earlier ruling in Engineering Tools Corporation, the Court emphasized that GST authorities must verify the authenticity of transactions by examining supporting evidence such as tax invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts, transport documents, and other records demonstrating actual movement and receipt of goods.

• While the Revenue argued that certain invoices were issued after the supplier’s cancellation and that adequate proof of receipt of goods had not been furnished, the Court noted that most transactions had occurred before the cancellation order was passed. Therefore, a detailed factual verification of the transactions was necessary before denying ITC.

• Accordingly, the High Court set aside the assessment orders relating to the relevant tax periods and remanded the matters for fresh adjudication. The authorities were directed to reconsider the ITC claims on merits, provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and pass fresh orders in accordance with law within the prescribed timeframe.

Madras HC - Fathima Traders vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer [WP Nos. 22419, 22420, &22422 OF 2023]

[Atul Modani @atulmodani]

While we come across so many success stories in CA exams, this update about Late Balaji is very tragic and heartbreaking.

A young CA who never got to hear "Congratulations" for his success.

Balaji cleared his CA Finals but death reached him before the results did, his family found out what he had achieved but he never did.

There is no lesson profound enough to make sense of this — only a reminder that we are not promised tomorrow.

Rest in peace, Balaji. You earned it. You were a CA.

Condolences to his family.

[carandbike @carandbike]

Made-in-India Renault Duster exports begin ✨️

The first shipment of 750 units of the reborn Duster has left from Chennai, and is headed to South Africa, with exports to other countries set to begin in the coming months.

Have you bought the new Duster?

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

⁦@TataCompanies⁩ recd call from this number stating Tata life insurance policy and was asking to activate the lapse policy

Seems to be fraud so plz take appropriate action

⁦@Cyberdost⁩ @CyberGujarat

[Arpit Haldia @haldiaarpit]

Dear Members and Professional Colleagues ,

We wish to inform you that the Marwar GST Appellate Tribunal Bar Association has submitted representation Dated 2nd June 2026 before the Hon’ble President, Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi.

The representation requests the GSTAT to issue clear, standardized guidance/FAQ on filing procedures to address inconsistencies and prevailing confusion. It highlights that absence of uniform instructions is leading to divergent practices, procedural defects, and delays in appeal processing. The Association also seeks early consideration of pending issues from earlier representations to streamline procedures and improve the efficiency of the tribunal.

This representation is part of our initiative to provide constructive inputs that can support the effective functioning of the GST Appellate Tribunal. Through such efforts, association seeks to contribute positively towards strengthening the GST Appellate Tribunal Framework.

With Kind Regards

CA Pradeep Jain Adv CA Dr Arpit Haldia
President Secretary

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

@Beno10_MFC

[Sushil Kumar Kabra @sskabra]

@Gosleepriya 99