A Trump appointed justice single-handedly upheld birthright citizenship.
No mass deportations, no border wall, no termination of birthright citizenship.
If Republicans can’t or won’t do anything about immigration then why vote for them?
Last night, the head of CBS Jacksonville called me. He informed me that the July 15 debate is officially canceled because, in his words, “Jay Collins refused to commit.”
Why would Jay Collins, a candidate polling in the single digits, refuse a full hour of free television? Hundreds of thousands of viewers. Free exposure. Every candidate’s dream.
Why would he turn that down?
Because @JayCollinsFL already got what he wanted.
He made a deal with @ByronDonalds and was promised the Lt. Governor position if he stayed in the race as a plant.
They know that Byron easily loses in a head-to-head with me, but Byron's odds go up if a third candidate like Jay can steal votes and help Byron win.
They are rigging the election, but it won't work.
We have 3x as many in-person events than Byron between now and Election Day.
Next week, I'll be the first candidate in Florida history to campaign in all 67 counties.
And our ground game is unmatched.
Despite their silly attempts to rig this election against us, we will win on August 18th, and it won't even be close.
TOO BIG TO RIG.
Israel used their control over Trump and their Jewish money to destroy Massie because he went against their agenda.
There is no denying that Trump’s GOP is nothing more than a front for Israel and it has to be destroyed for America First to prevail.
It’s really not that complicated.
The Republicans totally betrayed their voters and broke every single promise.
So I’m switching sides and voting Democrat in 2026 to punish them.
Some thoughts on the Nazi “Yellow Star” program.
Number one, why is it offensive? If you are a Jew, would wearing a star to symbol your Jewishness not be a source of pride?
Let’s imagine all the White people in America had to wear a White Star to symbolize that they were European… I would wear mine with pride.
The reason the Jew is so upset about being identified is because it makes it harder for him to be duplicitous, mischievous and dishonest. He cannot pretend to be White while clamoring for Mass migration or transgenderism if he donned his star.
He also then has to deal with the normal associations of Jews throughout history. As in other people know to watch out for swindlers and liars. Do Jews have great histories of building nations, or of rigging stock markets? Of spreading vitality or of spreading communism? In other words they have to deal with the truth of their history, which they prefer to obfuscate. (We are always victims for 2k years and it’s never our fault!)
Lastly, we already have a yellow star system in the west. What do you think
Wokeness and DEI is? Your score is the lowest if you are a straight White male. You are a Nazi. The difference is that it is done indirectly via census and job application info, rather than explicitly, (White people wearing White Stars.) The Jews always prefer this style of warfare. Deception is their main weapon. While they are selling “liberalism” what they are achieving is White death and displacement.
By doing it this way, their goals have some anonymity and are cloaked in “virtue.” But the other genius of doing it this way, is that without explicitly forcing Whites to wear a star, you tamp down on White solidarity.
If Whites were forced to wear stars, they would understand that they are targets. They are still targets nonetheless but it would be obvious.
If we were to pass a law where Blacks had to wear black stars, Whites had to wear White Stars, Mexicans had to wear brown Stars and Jews had to wear yellow starts, America would be better off.
You already are wearing a Star, you just aren’t aware of it, but if it was done publicly, then jewish overrepresentation, Jewish ethnocentrism, and jewish duplicity would not be able to hide.
THE NORMIE RETARD’S GUIDE TO WHY DOXXING IS BAD:
If you’re reading this past the week it was posted, you’ve likely been linked this Tweet by someone who has enough contempt for you to warrant the effort of doing so, yet still has some hope you’re capable of learning.
You’re probably the type of person who has their name and face plastered on their online account, going around and replying in spiteful contempt to anonymous users for “having cartoon pfps” and goading them with statements like “post yourself buddy” and asking them why they’re “hiding.”
The reason you are the way that you are and the reason you say the things you do (assuming you’re not a bad faith actor operating on low level political subterfuge), is because you’re a naive retard who is in no way native to the Internet.
Your life is so unremarkable and so insignificant that you’ve never even fathomed of the possibility that anything you say or do online could ever gain attention or care from anyone to the degree that those people spend time and effort in causing harm to you.
You have failed to reach any substantial portion of the Network where actual culture shaping discourse has taken place and even if you somehow wandered into such a space by accident, through some meandering chaotic circumstance akin to a dust mite floating on the wind, you’d never amount to any meaningful contribution to that discourse beyond the pale regurgitation of your base level opinion on the products you enjoy.
Because you lack the frame of reference or any level of sentience required to understand what it’s like to matter in any way, you will never naturally understand why doxxing is bad.
Doxxing is, in fact, very bad!
Like a third worlder migrant flossing his shit encrusted ass with the vertical metal handhold of a New York train car, you simply must be educated in the standards, customs, and culture of the ecosystem you are completely alien to.
WHY DOES THIS SHIT MATTER?
Everything that anyone finds enjoyable or cool about the internet comes from anonymous or pseudonymous people who kept their real life identity separate from their online identity.
In the Web 1.0 era, people inherently knew the internet could be a dangerous place. They developed guidance and caution for incoming children to try and follow, warning them from sharing personal details online and being careful of strangers.
They would wear cool avatars and make up fantastical usernames that would enshrine their personalities and steer their online presence into distinct archetypal personas. They developed a culture around their online form of existence and gathered in places to exchange new ideas, ideas which could be expressed with minimal fear of consequence.
This would be ruined when the Web 2.0 era began and the world wide web would begin to trade its myriad of cool and unique websites for a select handful of major content aggregates that doubled as social media platforms. Facebook was the great Satan which really started pushing a wider trend of associating your online identity with your real face and name.
The increase in accessibility provided by the emergence of smart phones sealed the fate of organic online culture, permanently shifting it towards an Overton Window centered around the sensibilities of unfamiliar normies who wouldn't understand or respect the environment they were entering (like you!).
WHY DO YOU NEED TO BE ANONYMOUS?
Anonymity protects you from having your ideas being shut down by people who are incapable of engaging rhetorically with you.
When someone is too weak or stupid to argue against something they don't like, they seek out alternative methods to censor you. They don't have any moral compunctions about the harm they could cause you in real life and they likely hate you enough to want you to be hurt or killed, or at the very least rob you of your livelihood.
IF SOMEONE'S WORDS CAUSE THEM TO BE ATTACKED, ISN'T IT THEIR FAULT? THEY SHOULD JUST BE NORMAL
You're too fucking stupid to understand what normal means.
Your standards of normality are completely artificial and fed to you by corporations and media who specifically want to castrate you into a suppliant little bisexual oaf that does nothing except consume products safely, repeat buzzwords when you're told, and roll over and die when it's time for you to be erased from history.
You have zero place telling anybody what they should or shouldn't say. You occupy the LOWEST spot on society's totem pole. You are a bottom feeder. You are scum. You are fucking fertilizer.
If you're actually the 'you' I'm directly addressing, you're here reading this post that's actively shitting on you and you're continuing to read it because you are a spineless little cuck, a sack of pathetic pudding meat that was shit out on God's most ignored conveyor belt for the sole purpose of consuming abuse and queefing out nitrogen gas. You're a flesh cube waiting to be buried in the stack of a billion other of you, a nutrient pile of inanimate cannon fodder.
Don't make the mistake of having opinions on what anyone should do. You're a bystander, a 2D hologram in a Gamecube stadium running a 3-second loop cheering animation while actual human beings fight over the way the world is going to be.
Who the fuck do you think you are to question an idea's value? You've never had an original idea in your life. Everything you enjoy about life is only made possible by the ideas of men who gathered together and took action to manifest those ideas into fruition.
If those ideas couldn't be exchanged, then any sort of progress or change would be incapable of occurring. Humanity is always in a state of imperfect conditions, trying constantly to improve and strive towards something better.
If you think there's ever a place in history where everything should just stop and stay there forever, then any point of history should never have occurred. If you genuinely believe that, go to subsaharan Africa and wander around amongst like minded individuals, see how long it takes before someone caves your skull in with a rock to see if there's gold inside or someone puts a burning tire around your neck because you reminded them of their favorite color.
I HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH
No you don't. Every country on earth has a magic combination of words that gets them a visit from the police. What you're alluding to is potentially the moderated breadth of speech you're allowed to post online and the wider breadth of speech you can probably get away with posting because nobody gives a shit about you.
The more notoriety you gain, the narrower that latter window becomes and the more enemies you naturally gain by the sheer mathematics of people disagreeing with you or simply just disliking you.
What you call "freedom of speech" is merely a promise that the government won't jail, murder, fine, or punish you for expressing your opinions. It doesn't guarantee you any safety from the harm others cause you. It doesn't stop the few corporations and investment firms that attempt to swallow up every social platform online from banning your account and deleting every post you've ever made. It doesn't stop ravenous mentally ill people from obsessively stalking you and harassing your parents, siblings, and children by spreading false rumors about you.
WELL CANCEL CULTURE IS BEING KILLED, YOU WON CHUD. WHAT DO YOU CARE?
As long as there are pathetic rape victim ghouls roaming the internet looking to punish people as a catharsis for their own squalid existence, there is always going to be a cancel culture.
This isn't addressed to those freaks. They're going to exist no matter what, they're a guaranteed presence doled out by the mathematics of living ecosystems. Just as there are always barbarians, marauders, and bandits in between the pockets of civilized states, there will always be viruses, parasites, and doxxers.
This is addressed to you, the suppliant cattle class, a verbally audible node in the unwashed masses that help push things in a worse direction because you're stupid enough to get steered towards having the worst opinion possible.
There is a war taking place for hearts and minds online and its consequences reverberate out into the "real world." The world isn't any realer than the internet. Everyone and everything is online. For all intents and purposes, the internet is now real life and it will be forever.
The clothes you wear, the food you eat, the car you drive, your ability to work, your potential to reproduce, your children's psychological and biological safety, the media you consume, the quality of the air you breathe, the politicians that decide whether you get drafted into a war, the machines that decide whether you get evaporated into a pink mist from an incoming cruise missile and the machines that launched those missiles, all of these things are beholden to the ebb and flow of information online.
Stop processing the "internet" as a little space where things happen that don't affect you. It's not a separate tiny video game dimension of words on a screen, it's the fucking neural network of humanity's collective beliefs and knowledge interacting with itself in real-time.
If you think you're somehow better than the internet, that you're somehow superior to people who spend their time on the internet because you only use your phone to text your kids and look up the weather, you're not. You're just nonparticipant. You're at the mercy of the cooperative services and goods provided by people who use the internet.
Your beliefs that you meticulously and carefully adopt because some decrepit make up wearing geriatric closet case said them slowly to you behind a news desk are the polished turds pilfered in the aftermath of an online battleground that's fighting an entirely different war by this point.
The words you jokingly use because your coworkers explained them to you after their kids said them enough times at home six months ago are the product of onliners who stopped using them five years ago.
The movies that are stale and shitty, the songs on the radio that sound the same as they've sounded for a decade, the clothes you're unimpressed by, the sports games that haven't been as exciting for the past two decades, the books on the shelf at Barnes and Noble that all have the same covers, and the shitty paint streak graffiti you can't understand when you google "modern art" once, all of it screams to you that culture is dying.
You think all of this because none of it is real culture, it's stale reruns being puked together by other people who haven't really been online. You're in a decrepit bubble of decade long repetition while real culture and real change happens on the internet.
You can't see it because you've never tried to look. Your idea of YouTube is the app on the TV that shows you SNL skits and Kevin Hart doing push up challenges with Dwayne Johnson on the For You feed with the account signed out. Your front page is the newsfeed on MSN before you painstakingly type your email login for seven minutes to pay your bills. By some miracle you found yourself on Twitter and you're probably following Anderson Cooper and Bill Gates while the spiciest shit that comes across your feed is black people communicating in gifs of movie characters making "dayum" expressions.
I can't emphasize enough, you do not matter. You're here because you're retarded and the only purpose this post serves is to try and convey enough of that scorn into your heart so that maybe for once in your godforsaken life you feel some sense of consequence to the stupid unconsidered shit you spew out in replies. And maybe that someone with some bare level of sapience can read this alongside you and actually gain some level of understanding as to why doxxing is the biggest sin online.
Doxxing is the chemical gas of WW1, a reckless act of cruelty that turns the playing field into a nasty chaotic slaughterhouse, opening the premise of retribution as a possibility. It has no place in the arena of ideas and the only thing worse than a savage who opts for it as a last resort is the insolent little child troglodyte standing on the sidelines cheering for it.
Now, fuck off and lurk silently forever.
Trump cancelled “Mass Deportations” because apparently it’s too unpopular right before the midterm elections.
Then he bombed Iran and started the most unpopular war in modern history. Now we have an energy crisis and a global recession.
That is the definition of Israel First.
1. JFK tried to stop Israel from nuclear proliferation and was shot in the head at an event organized by a Jewish philanthropist named “Julius Schepps.”
2. Nixon tried to purge Jews from the US Department of Defense and was impeached.
3. Henry Kissinger threatened an arms embargo against Israel and Israel threatened the US with nukes.
3. Gerald Ford threatened to withhold funding from Israel and AIPAC sponsored a bill that was signed by 68 senators blocking the president from withholding funding.
4. Eisenhower pressured Israel to withdraw from occupied Egyptian territory. Israel delayed and, as they left, destroyed key infrastructure.
5. Steve Rosen—the AIPAC staffer who received U.S. secrets from Larry Franklin and passed them to Israel—once said AIPAC could get 70 senators to sign a blank cocktail napkin if it wanted.
The list goes on…
This is not our ally. This is a foreign enemy that has taken control of and occupies our government.
Never forget that Donald Trump and his Department of Justice both said that the “Epstein Files” DO NOT EXIST for a year.
THEY LIED. And they only released the files because they were ordered to by an act of Congress. What else are they hiding?
James Watson has died at 97. Few men spoke more plainly, and with less fear, about the biological foundations of human difference.
A prodigy who entered the University of Chicago at fifteen and, with Francis Crick, later discovered the structure of DNA, he revealed the code that defines life itself. He belonged to an older world, when truth mattered more than ideological pretense.
He wrote prolifically, spoke without restraint, and stood apart from the rituals of submission that have since conquered modern science. For him, inquiry demanded honesty rather than obedience, and he held that truth, biological and often unequal, was sacred.
In 2007 he said what every serious researcher already knew but feared to admit: that human populations differ in average intelligence, and that these differences shape civilization itself. For that act of candor, the institutions he had built turned against him. The press howled, lectures were cancelled, and his name became a scandal whispered only in private.
He was also no reactionary but a lifelong liberal, a believer in “progress” and “equality.” Yet it was his integrity, not malice or personal failing, that doomed him. When asked in his old age if he regretted his words, he answered simply: “Not at all. I wish there were new knowledge, that there be new evidence showing nurture is more important than nature. But I haven’t seen any knowledge.” For that final act of honesty, and defiance, the last honors that still bore his name were stripped away.
For speaking these basic and long-established truths, he paid dearly. Cast out from the profession he helped to create, he later sold his Nobel Prize medal after he had been made penniless.
In the cruel irony that governs the world today, the man who gave mankind the key to its genetic code was condemned for revealing the reality it had laid bare.
Yet truth endures beyond censure, and his name will outlast the age that sought to erase it.
To honor him is to continue the search he began, to keep alight the flame of courage that makes discovery possible, and to stand for truth, whatever the cost.
i use this as a premise and joke about it pretty often, but the orientation ancient stuff had towards why things have the properties they do was completely inverted from how we presently see it.
for most of human history, take metal for example, iron had the properties it has (hardness, malleability, and so on) because it was iron. its essence was “iron-ness”, and what you observed about it flowed backwards from this mysterious quintessential aspect. this also applies to the larger categories its in, like “metals”.
everything was like this. why is water usually cold? why does water tend towards coldness? it just does: that is a property of water. things that have this essence of “water-ness” just do that.
you can basically model the project of us “becoming modern” as: people going through every field and smashing these concepts, because they saw them as outdated, magical, or nonsensical - and then building it back up the other way.
example: why is iron hard? it has nothing to do with this magical made up concept of “iron-ness” or “metal-ness” that exists out there somewhere as a metaphysical ideal. that’s just made up. a metal is hard because of the way the molecules are arranged. if its malleable, thats because it is actually made up of these other things, which are bound together in this way - then, if you understand how heat affects those bonds and component parts, you could obviously see why it’s malleable.
it doesnt possess malleability because its a metal, it possess malleability for purely logical material reasons that we can deduce.
there’s no magical category called “metals” that you need to understand and use to deduce the properties of metals and explain why metals are the way they are. you can just look at the component parts, and apply what you know about the world, and you’ll explain to yourself why the metals have the properties they do.
this sounds completely insane and perhaps needlessly pedantic, but it’s actually a completely different way of viewing the world - and in my opinion, this shift took place successfully in every even remotely scientific field - except one.
the reason this is extremely relevant for our time - this exact specific time you presently inhabit, is that this never happened for consciousness and the mind.
consciousness was never taken out of the top down semi-magical tautological “it is consciousness, therefore it has these properties” shelf and put on to the “we can explain this by analyzing its component parts and using what we know about the world” shelf.
the mind still stands alone as the last true vestige of a previous, much older, way of seeing the world that this new view has been totally unable to colonize. and because it’s the last real holdout, we allow people to pretend it stands alone for other reasons: sentimentality, religion, self-aggrandizement, whatever. or, we let people pretend the project i’ve described above was completed.
but it wasn’t. “the mind” has modernized everything but itself.
Scenario A: You board a train car and see a black person, you immediately turn and leave— You’re a racist.
Scenario B: You sit beside a black person and get stabbed to death— You’re dead.
Scenario C: You fight back and subdue your attacker— You’re charged with manslaughter.
@AFpost So let me get this straight, Donald Trump had his DOJ interview Ghislaine Maxwell so she can say that nobody was involved, there was no blackmail list, and Jeffrey Epstein most certainly did not work for the state of Israel.
Let us never forget that one year ago today, our President Donald Trump was spared from sudden death by God
Trump took a bullet so that he could live to cover up Epstein’s pedophile island and to bomb Iran for Israel 🤍💙