@Nher_who It is easy. Paswan fought on 143 seats and this time only on 29 seats. Which means his per seat vote share went up around 4 times inspite of lower over all %.
This is for educated people not uneducated ones like the author of this post
@JhaSanjay Either you did not see Bihar under RJD or you chose to ignore it. 6 PM looked like curfew had been imposed. People remember that and that is why RJD did not and will not come back
Dogs are out saving humans in India,
Searching for bombs.
So why the courts and government is silent on the draconian order of removal of dogs.
लाल किले #RedFort#CarBlast#News#DelhiBlast#LalQila#HighAlert Hyundai i20 LNJP Chandni Chowk
@MariusCRoodt It is like trying to cut the branch you are sitting on. Your board's salary is paid by us. Without India ICC will go broke and so will your boards. Which is why you always bend to our will
@MarkramBot Then why did your board not object to this schedule when it was made. India had simply said it will not travel to Pakistan. SA cricket should have then voted for India being removed from the tournament.
But wait SA Cric needs revenue from India so they agreed and voted for this
@_amitbehere Dumbhead, the Technology has been upgraded to lower pollution levels. So however well maintained a 2010 vehicle will be, it will still be BSIII whereas we are in the age of BSVI stage 2.
@ncakos316 Even if India had played the original venue, it was still 1 venue being allocated by the host nation. So even then Australia and SA would have had to wait for the result of our match.
Also all boards agreed to this schedule. your own board agreed to it, so stop whining
@sardesairajdeep If you were an unbiased journalist you would be saying that India was otherwise also scheduled to play all its matches at 1 venue, Lahore. So otherwise also the teams would be waiting to see who plays India at Lahore. Nothing changed. But that would be unbiased journalism 🙄