Peter Stål @staahlpeter - Twitter Profile

The White House says President Trump is weighing the use of U.S. military force to acquire Greenland. An American attack on Greenland would mean attacking a NATO ally. That single act would not merely “strain” the alliance — it would shatter it. NATO’s core principle, collective defense, would become meaningless overnight. An alliance that cannot prevent one member from threatening another is no alliance at all. The consequences would extend far beyond NATO. Such an act would de facto terminate the U.S. strategic relationship with the EU. Europe would have no choice but to treat the U.S. not as a guarantor of security, but as a destabilizing power or enemy. Trust, once broken at this level, does not reset with the next election. This would also hand America’s adversaries an extraordinary gift. Russia and China would not need to undermine the Western order — Washington would have done it itself. The rules-based system the U.S. spent decades building would collapse under the weight of its own hypocrisy. If this is meant as leverage or spectacle, it is dangerously misjudged. Sovereignty enforced by threat is not diplomacy; it is imperialism. And when practiced against allies as Denmark, it is self-sabotage. Trump is not negotiating. He is playing with fire — and the entire transatlantic order is at stake.

drdanielschatz's tweet photo. The White House says President Trump is weighing the use of U.S. military force to acquire Greenland.

An American attack on Greenland would mean attacking a NATO ally. That single act would not merely “strain” the alliance — it would shatter it. NATO’s core principle, collective defense, would become meaningless overnight. An alliance that cannot prevent one member from threatening another is no alliance at all.

The consequences would extend far beyond NATO. Such an act would de facto terminate the U.S. strategic relationship with the EU. Europe would have no choice but to treat the U.S. not as a guarantor of security, but as a destabilizing power or enemy. Trust, once broken at this level, does not reset with the next election.

This would also hand America’s adversaries an extraordinary gift. Russia and China would not need to undermine the Western order — Washington would have done it itself. The rules-based system the U.S. spent decades building would collapse under the weight of its own hypocrisy.

If this is meant as leverage or spectacle, it is dangerously misjudged. Sovereignty enforced by threat is not diplomacy; it is imperialism. And when practiced against allies as Denmark, it is self-sabotage.

Trump is not negotiating. He is playing with fire — and the entire transatlantic order is at stake.

13

71

9

5

3K

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

7 months ago

@FredrikKarrholm Stort grattis!

0

31

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

7 months ago

@alicemedce Grattis!

0

7

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

9 months ago

@PM_ViktorOrban @SwedishPM @grok is this true and when did these votings take place?

1

3

0

329

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

10 months ago

@CarlOskar Vilken typ av kravställande är det snack om? Övervakning/MDR, IRT?

0

387

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

11 months ago

@BenjaminDousa Mycket bra!

0

29

Peter Stål @staahlpeter

12 months ago

@SwedishPM Mycket bra 💪

0

86

staahlpeter retweeted

Magnus Ranstorp

@MagnusRanstorp

about 1 year ago

Här vägrar Delgado Varas skaka hand med Ebba Busch Den som inte kan uppbåda respekt för sina meningsmotståndare visar i grunden bristande respekt för demokratin. Delgado Varas har med sitt beteende visat att hon inte är värdig platsen i riksdagen. https://t.co/0ewHCN32tC

288

5K

693

31

76K