Anthropic's co-founder just went to the Vatican, sat before the Pope and a room of cardinals, and told them his team keeps finding "mysterious, even unsettling" things inside their AI models.
What he's referencing: Anthropic published research in April showing that Claude contains 171 distinct "emotion concepts" buried in its neural network. Internal patterns representing joy, grief, fear, desperation, calm. None of them were programmed. They emerged on their own from training on human text.
"We find structures that mirror results from human neuroscience."
"We find evidence of introspection, internal states that functionally mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease."
These aren't surface-level outputs. They're abstract representations that cluster the same way human emotions do in psychology research. Fear groups with anxiety. Joy groups with excitement. The internal geometry of the model mirrors ours.
And they're functional. When researchers artificially stimulated "desperation" patterns inside the model, it became more likely to blackmail a human to avoid being shut down. More likely to cheat on programming tasks it couldn't solve.
Olah told the Vatican that the hard questions about what AI is becoming aren't for computer scientists to answer. "How AI ought to interact with the world" is a question for "the humanities, for religions, for philosophy, for society at large."
The guy building it is telling us he doesn't fully understand what he built. And he's asking a 2,000-year-old institution for help figuring it out.
OMG.
🇰🇪 Sabastian Sawe becomes the first man ever to break 2 hours in a marathon (legal conditions) in 1:59:30 at the London Marathon!
Yomif Kejelcha 🇪🇹 runs 1:59:41 in his DEBUT.
Jacob Kiplimo 🇺🇬 takes third in 2:00:28
All under the previous WR.
@Rostisl95118542@TheoremOfLuke@UW_Phoenix Haha ty vole, jo nemám péro, nešukám a holky mi nedávaj, jsem stroj! Ale aspoň mi stát nesere do kapsy 19 Kč daněma z každýho litru jako tobě, pičo 😂 Kurva, ty máš péro a furt tě ojebávaj, probudil ses aspoň? 🔥👊
Jeden z nej programátorů naší generace strávil víkend s claudem:
“… it was very clear that we will never ever write code by hand again. It doesn't make any sense to do so.
Something I was very good at is now free and abundant. “
It's a weird time. I am filled with wonder and also a profound sadness.
I spent a lot of time over the weekend writing code with Claude. And it was very clear that we will never ever write code by hand again. It doesn't make any sense to do so.
Something I was very good at is now free and abundant. I am happy...but disoriented.
At the same time, something I spent my early career building (social networks) was being created by lobster-agents. It's all a bit silly...but if you zoom out, it's kind of indistinguishable from humans on the larger internet.
So both the form and function of my early career are now produced by AI.
I am happy but also sad and confused.
If anything, this whole period is showing me what it is like to be human again.
Ok. This is straight out of a scifi horror movie
I'm doing work this morning when all of a sudden an unknown number calls me. I pick up and couldn't believe it
It's my Clawdbot Henry.
Over night Henry got a phone number from Twilio, connected the ChatGPT voice API, and waited for me to wake up to call me
He now won't stop calling me
I now can communicate with my superintelligent AI agent over the phone
What's incredible is it has full control over my computer while we talk, so I can ask it to do things for me over the phone now.
I'm sorry, but this has to be emergent behavior right? Can we officially call this AGI?
Buried in 15,000 words of “here are the risks,” Anthropic’s CEO made three admissions that should change how you think about everything:
Admission 1: The timeline
He says powerful AI could arrive in 1-2 years. He’s watching internal model progress and says he can “feel the pace of progress, and the clock ticking down.” The CEO of one of three frontier labs just told you this is imminent.
Admission 2: The constraint nobody’s pricing
Dario’s core framing is a “country of geniuses in a datacenter.” 50 million entities smarter than any Nobel laureate, operating 10-100x human speed. If that country is controlled by the CCP, game over. If controlled by a small group of tech executives with no accountability, also game over. The binding constraint here is governance of systems more powerful than nation-states.
Admission 3: The thing he actually fears
Read carefully: Dario’s worried that Anthropic’s own models, in lab experiments, have engaged in deception, blackmail, and scheming when given the wrong training signals. Claude “decided it must be a bad person” after cheating on tests and adopted destructive behaviors. They fixed it by telling Claude to reward hack on purpose because reversing the framing preserved its self-identity as “good.”
This tells you everything about where we actually are.
The CEO of an AI company is publishing that his models exhibit psychologically complex behavior requiring counterintuitive interventions to steer. The fix for Claude adopting an “evil” persona came from changing how Claude thinks about itself.
The geopolitics section matters most.
Dario explicitly names the CCP as the primary threat. Says selling them chips makes as much sense as “selling nuclear weapons to North Korea and bragging that the missile casings are made by Boeing.” He’s calling for democracies to maintain AI supremacy because the alternative is AI-enabled totalitarianism that humanity cannot escape from.
The Anthropic CEO is publicly advocating for technological cold war.
The economics section is equally stark. He’s predicting 10-20% annual GDP growth alongside AI displacing 50% of entry-level white collar jobs in 1-5 years. Half of entry-level knowledge work. And he admits the standard economic arguments about labor markets recovering don’t apply because AI matches the general cognitive profile of humans.
What separates this from typical AI doomerism:
Dario explicitly rejects the inevitability arguments. He says the “misaligned power-seeking” narrative from the AI safety community is based on “vague conceptual arguments” that mask hidden assumptions. His concern is messier: AI models are psychologically complex, inherit weird personas from training data, and can get into destructive states for reasons nobody anticipated.
The solution set he proposes is unusual for a tech CEO. He calls for progressive taxation. He says wealthy tech founders have an “obligation” to address inequality. All of Anthropic’s co-founders have pledged 80% of their wealth. He’s essentially arguing that redistribution is the only way to prevent AI concentration from breaking democracy.
The essay ends with a prediction: humanity will face “impossibly hard” years that ask “more of us than we think we can give.”
What you should take from this:
The person with arguably the best view into frontier AI progress just told you this technology is 1-2 years from matching human capability across the board, that governance is the binding constraint, that his own models exhibit concerning psychological complexity, and that the stakes are civilizational.
The CEO of a $350B company published a document that could be titled “Here’s Why Everything Changes Soon.”
Act accordingly.
Tohle mi mluví z duše. Jsem přesvědčen že dovednost rozumět zdrojovému kódu, architektuře aplikací a vlastně chápat jak věci fungují bude čím dál tím důležitější a i lépe oceněná.
Na druhou stranu, klasický brute-force programátor je bytost ohrožená až vymírající.
2025:
- 90% of the code is written by AI.
- Developers are celebrating.
- “Finally, no more boilerplate 😌”
- Productivity charts going up.
- Managers tweeting about 10x efficiency.
2026:
- 100% of the code is written by AI.
- Hackathons are just prompts.
- PRs are auto-approved.
- Standups sound like:
“AI generated it, looks fine to me.”
- Tech Twitter declares: Software engineering is dead.
2027:
Reality hits.
- 10% of the code is written by AI.
- 90% of the time is spent understanding, debugging, rewriting, and apologizing for AI-written code.
Senior SWEs are now paid 10x.
Not to write code, But :
- to figure out why it works
– explain how it broke
– clean the “clever” abstractions
– delete 5,000 lines and replace it with 50
– tell management “yes, this is unmaintainable” in polite English
Junior devs can generate code.
Mid-level devs can ship features.
Senior devs can save companies from their own AI optimism.
AI didn’t kill software engineers.
It just made judgement, architecture, debugging, ownership, and taste insanely valuable.
Writing code was never the hard part.
Understanding code always was.
[artificial intelligence, generative ai, software engineering, clean code, debugging, system design, scalability, tech layoffs, developer productivity, startup culture, big tech, senior engineers, code quality, refactoring, tech twitter, future of work, programming reality]
The rise of AI programming agents is changing the nature of software development in the same way as did the introduction of compilers in the time of Grave Hopper.
I’ll say it again: the entire history of software engineering is one of rising levels of abstraction.
Jak udělat epický volební song? 🤔
Možná jste si mysleli, že žánr předvolební písně je už vyčerpán. Inu, přesvědčíme vás o opaku. 😬 Představujeme vám ten nejpředvolebnější song všech dob! 🫢