@ThisIsTheFatRat Pretty sure this is the first time in all your music I've had to sit down with a piano and a pause button to map out the chord progression. (Why yes, that *is* a fully diminished seventh!) Thanks for what might be my new favorite of yours!
Aha, it's not that the content has changed. It's that retweets are no longer labeled as such, and just show up as out-of-sequence tweets by not-followed accounts, without attribution. https://t.co/Y9t0jDHGpw
OK, so even the "Following" tab no longer includes only accounts I follow, and is no longer chronological? That's the only way I'm interested in using this (Twitter on desktop) ... am I missing an option someplace?
@youtah In home theater with the volume up? No subtitles (they contain spoilers). But watching with limited volume or in a noisy environment? Too easy to miss quiet dialog without them.
@youtah I'm impressed that you get that much cloud movement without visible star trails. Windy night? Also chuckling because the convenient gap in the clouds over Orion reminds me of https://t.co/Txdi8IdZTe
The date 02-02-2020 is the only eight-digit palindrome of the century. It works in the cross-cultural formats of MM-DD-YYYY and DD-MM-YYYY.
The last time we had such a date was 908 years ago on 11-11-1111. https://t.co/Bamhz9tX3i
@tadousay@SlackHQ@discordapp My team (software eng) uses Slack. Most members are clustered in two TZs 9 hours apart, so lots of asynchronous comms. Customizable notification preferences and visibility = no (unwanted) midnight pings, and easy to get caught up.
Looks like @wunderground has pulled the plug on the API that supported outdated app versions (5.x) on Android. New app (6.x) is still terrible. Welcome to 2020.
Hey @twitter, you forced me onto the "new" Twitter just now, and it sounds like you're not going to permanently respect my preference for a purely chronological feed. Fix that serious lapse in judgment, please.
Were #StrangerThings characters ahead of their time with Planck's constant (h)?
2018: h=6.62607015 x 10^-34 J s
2014: h=6.62607004 x 10^-34 J s
1985: [SPOILER] tells the party that h=6.62607004 x 10^-34 J s, when the accepted value was still 6.626176 x 10^-34 J s that year.
@mdekstrand I'm a proponent of the subwoofer route if you listen to a wide variety of content. Tabletop devices like smart speakers are physically incapable of reproducing the deepest bass notes to my satisfaction, though some sound impressive for their size.
@drskyskull "Race you to the top," my friend said when my choir stopped there on tour in 2006. To this day I don't know how I managed not to puke over the edge.
@FiveThirtyEight Methodology question: does the calculation weight precincts by vote count? https://t.co/00w5HtaoMg says bright-red WVC020 had Trump beat Clinton 2 votes to 0. What's SLC segregation number w/o WVC020?
@djsmith42 Interesting comparison. These abbreviations (could) communicate "I know a little Latin!" Just like single-letter variables might say "I know a little FORTRAN."