Tintin Quarantino

Domestic Terrier, wwg1’s, watches and waters

[Donnie Cope @dcopechatter]

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Tens of thousands of Spencer Pratt voters are now receiving rejection letters from the county clerk saying that their ballots were not counted due to signature irregularities. Yet, Governor Gavin Newsom just passed legislation that would make it illegal for anyone conducting oversight, to contest signatures that they deemed fraudulent. Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a 🙂 to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted. 🤔 One of these California Republican voters said that his signature has been on file for over 20 years and there has never been an issue until he voted for Spencer Pratt. Nithya Ramen has beaten Spencer Pratt by less than 3000 votes. There are at least 18,000 Pratt voters who received this letter saying their votes were rejected.

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@daalyy33 @seostock So esteemed, in fact, that a woman’s testimony is worth half of a man’s. You worship a child rapist.

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@TheFlatEartherr This looks like someone blurred a video of someone playing with one of those plasma globes you used to be able to get at Spencer’s.

[Johnny Midnight ⚡️ @its_The_Dr]

Leftist threatens Nick Shirley’s life.

[Adam Carolla @adamcarolla]

Always remember

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@DukeGomez7 I saw this one, I think. Didn’t the kid in the first picture end up sexually assaulting the girl in the second photo?

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@josh_uglyasf She said

[The Drunk Republican @DrunkRepub]

Nurses practicing their TikTok hantavirus dances

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@PlanetOfMemes

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@Janet_sm145

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@raven_brah @benmccomposer Give me fudge
Give me fries
Give me sandwich on the side

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@HistorianUSA1 @its_The_Dr Plot twist. There was no second man and she has a face like a Denver omelet.

[Desiree @DesireeAmerica4]

Update: This is Judge Nathan Milliron. He went viral last week for berating a Harris County IT worker who was just trying to help him. But today, the story took a dark turn. A local attorney who criticized the judge’s behavior online has officially been ordered to appear in court.

​Think about that. A judge is using his bench to target a private citizen for a social media post. When those who wear the robes start acting like they are above the law, they aren't protecting the courtroom, they’re protecting their own egos.

​Is this "Contempt of Court," If a judge can summon you for a tweet, none of us are safe.
​Is this justice, or is it a judicial power trip?

[Adam Carolla @adamcarolla]

You no kings assholes better go find a fucking mirror

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Indeed, @SenSchumer, you are lying.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Exactly

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@MatthewTyrmand @JamesOKeefeIII You have the weak chin of a compromised dickhead.

[Tintin Quarantino @steamraise]

@Sierra_rak He Wilhelmed.