@sagesteele Look in the .gov site that explains to you “Mailed ballots must be postmarked on or before Election Day and received not later than 7 days after Election Day.” As a military family, you should know it has been a part of America since before the civil war.
@sagesteele Marco Rubio’s children who are all adults are wondering when Papa is coming back??
Are you officially old enough not to care whether what you repost?
Shame you have fallen so far from respectful journalist to propaganda peddler
@liz_churchill10 Yea that’s not how science works… 200 patients, multiple cancer types, no control group… might as well just say “I know it works cause my friend’s uncle says it helped him”
US Senator: "Do you believe that there is evidence that the flu vaccine prevents serious disease and…deaths in children?"
Surgeon General Nominee: "I believe all patients should talk to their doctors—"
US Senator: "That's not what I'm asking."
BERNIE SANDERS: Do vaccines cause autism?
BHATTACHARYA: I do not believe that the measles vaccine causes autism
SANDERS: Nah. Uh uh. I didn't ask measles. Do vaccines cause autism?
BHATTACHARYA: I have not seen a study that suggests any single vaccine causes autism
@houmanhemmati You clearly don’t know how the match ranking and process works. You clearly know nothing about the applicants - but you know 1 male that you think was good enough. You are an embarrassment to physician and the Persian community, one where our women as the top physician leaders.
@AaronSiriSG Sounds like you think healthcare access is right…. Not a privilege. However in our current system, it is not a right.
If you don’t follow the rules of any business, you don’t have the right to access their services. They don’t need to persuade you to follow their rules
I have read that paper. You should try reading past the highlighted lines. I know, reading context is a hard thing to do so let me see if I can help you out here.
PMID 36006288 (Trop Med Infect Dis, 2022) does not show “thousands of teens with permanent heart damage.” It shows the opposite. I mean seriously, you should read it.
What the study actually says:
• Prospective cohort of 301 Thai adolescents after dose 2
• 1 confirmed case of myopericarditis
• 2 suspected pericarditis
• 4 suspected subclinical myocarditis
• All cases were mild and fully resolved within 14 days
• No deaths
• No permanent cardiac damage
The authors’ own conclusion:
“The clinical presentation … was usually mild and temporary, with all cases fully recovering.”
Tachycardia, palpitations, transient BP changes ≠ myocarditis ≠ permanent injury.
Those are expected, short-lived physiologic responses, which is why the authors monitored them.
If this paper supported your claim, it would show:
• persistent LV dysfunction (that means the main pumping part of the heart wouldn't have a good amount of blood ejecting).
• scarring on follow-up MRI (which we don't see)
• heart failure, arrhythmias, deaths (oddly they recover)
It shows none of that. Seriously none.
Saying “many deaths” and “thousands with permanent heart damage” while citing a paper that documents zero deaths and full recovery is not debate—it’s misrepresentation. Why do you do that - but you accuse me of AI?
Calling careful risk-balanced language “not compassionate” doesn’t change the data.
Compassion without accuracy is misinformation. And you present that - you present bits of data and ask me if I have read it. I might point out - it was not an anti-vaccine advocate who wrote this - it was the scientists, and you should read the whole thing.
This study supports exactly what I said:
rare, usually mild, self-limited myocarditis—far less severe than myocarditis from COVID infection itself. By the way, this data was reproduced among 2.4 million Army enlisted men.
That’s not glib.
That’s what the paper actually shows. Yes, I read it when it came out - or shortly thereafter. Try reading the whole paper and the ones that came out with it.
@sagesteele Can you also post one which cases has the murderer been arrest and charged for their killing?
Sage has a wonderful cognitive dissonance of noticing the differences in situations