🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine

Indigenous ❤️ Hidatsa (ciicga), Latine, queer, He/They. OFMD/WWDITS/Good Omens/Star Trek/Ted Lasso. 🪶🏳️‍⚧️✨️😎

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

Look at us! I am so happy to have found my people because of OFMD!

[Well Sussed 🏴‍☠️🦇 (Michelle🪴) #CrewForLife @LongMayHeRoam]

TL cleanse! Let's see the faces of the 30+ Our Flag Means Death fandom 🏴��☠️

QRT with your favorite photo at an ofmd event, with ofmd moots, rocking ofmd merch, watching ofmd, or any other way you've found joy and ✨BELONGING✨through Fandom in your 30s and beyond!

#OurFlagMeansUs

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

I am still respectfully asking for help getting my channel, ScalingStories, manually reviewed by a real person after being demonetized for “inauthentic content.” I have been trying for weeks to explain my situation, and I feel completely lost because I still do not believe this label accurately reflects my channel or the work I put into my videos.

I understand why YouTube has policies against automated, mass-produced, repetitive, or minimally transformed content, and I respect those rules. I know YouTube has to protect viewers, advertisers, and the platform from content that does not add real value. I am not asking for those policies to be ignored. I am only asking for my channel to be reviewed with the full context of how my content is actually made.

My videos are voiced by me, edited by me, and built around my own commentary and reactions. I record my own gameplay/background footage, manually edit each video in DaVinci Resolve, and use custom avatars to represent myself while speaking to my viewers. This is not an automated process. It is a very manual one, and I put a lot of time and care into making the videos feel personal to my channel.

I do not simply read stories and repost them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to make the content entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience. My viewers directly respond to my commentary in the comments, which shows they are engaging with my personal contribution, not just the original story.

This channel and community mean a lot to me. Even while demonetized, I have kept creating because I care about the viewers who show up for my videos, and I do not want to let them down. I am not asking for special treatment. I am only asking for a fair manual review from a real person.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT

#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview #fixyoutube

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

You've made a mistake. I need a real person/specialist to review my channel. You have flagged other creators for “inauthentic content,” but after a real person manually reviewed their channels, that decision was overturned and their monetization was restored. There are several cases like that across this platform, so I know it is possible.

It is not fair to make me wait another 90 days just to have a chance to reapply for the program when I have done nothing wrong. I have reviewed your policies, and my videos do not violate them.

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @TeamYouTube,
I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.”

My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers.

The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.”

I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.”

I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel.

To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program.

My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

Rising from the dead (actually using this account) to repost this omg please lets manifest this!

[David Jenkins @david_jenkins__]

If anyone wants to pick us up for S3, I'm sure we could get the band back together

[David Jenkins @david_jenkins__]

If anyone wants to pick us up for S3, I'm sure we could get the band back together

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

👀

[🌈 Rainbow Mantis Shramp 🦐 @SHRAAAMP]

NOT THE CHAINNNN 😭

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

@wndrngnomad Thank you! 💕

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

I did a new Sticky Note Sketch yall, bit I'm mostly active on the blue app now so I forgot to share it here!

Calypso! My heart!

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

@BadgersKnackers Thank you Badger!!!!

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

@SHRAAAMP Thanks Shraaamp! 💜

[G❤️‍🔥 @radicallysoft]

i had to do it to ‘em

[🎃🍆StellarCyn🍆🎃🍉🏴‍☠️Ambassador Aubergine @StellarCyn]

Hey, I don't post much here anymore, I'm more active on the sky app, and I probably have a lot of crossover moots here, but thought I'd post here too! We're having a Valentines OFMD celebration on the OurFlagMeansILoveYou discord this weekend! 2/14-2/16 https://t.co/Fp7OwBdTTv

[Rob Mac @RMcElhenney]

🦅🥹

[Robb Rockham @bigtimerobb]

White people will tell you they couldn’t understand a word Kendrick said and then put on some Pearl Jam.

[Liz @Lizofnowhere]

Nobody asked for Pink Pony Club Nadja but I had a vision

[🌈 Rainbow Mantis Shramp 🦐 @SHRAAAMP]

The Stede Bonnet experience.