God has a sense of humor.
Democrats prayed for tornadoes and rain for the UFC 250 event…but God parted the storms and a beautiful night took place!🇺🇸✝️🙏
Vice President @JDVance explains why he chose to sit down with the sad cat ladies on The View, even though they hate his guts:
“The President’s attitude on this is, and I really do believe this, is 'you go everywhere. You go anywhere to try and take the message'… What I love about this administration is we go everywhere, and The View has a lot of people who watch it. Now, most of them are not sympathetic to the administration. But if every 10 people who watch that show are not fans of ours, but you get the message out to one open-minded person, that was worth it in my view. And that’s how we’re going to win the future, is actually go out and persuade people even in hostile places.”
Every single Christian organization, pastor, ex MLB player and current Christian player should be speaking up right now, and loudly. You hold the cards. @MLB needs us to survive. Christian America made them rich. If they aren’t forced into major concessions here, we deserve it.
Somebody has to be the richest person on the planet.
The fact that it’s the guy who popularized electric cars, made rockets reusable, and is working on curing blindness and paraplegia as a side quest seems fair to me.
It is OUR money!!
Thank you Mr Secretary
Concerning Social Security payments, my contributions were made for over 40 years on every salary I received. Those jobs may not have always been the work I wanted to be doing at the time, BUT I always had a job. The Social Security check is now (or soon will be) referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment?" I'll be part of the one percent to forward this.
I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it. The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment." This isn't a benefit. It is our money paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.
Congress took our money and used it elsewhere. They forgot (oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer. And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a "benefit", as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Just because they borrowed the money doesn't mean that our investments were a charity!
Let's take a stand. We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government.
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it. Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.
Please, for the sake of our country, share this message. It's important!!!
Let's be real.
The real reason that Britain is beginning to censor social media is because of things such as what police did to Henry Nowak.
It was covered up by the media.
But the truth came out on X.
That's why they want to censor social media.
The Left wants the White House to feel like an untouchable institution reserved for political elites. They hate seeing it used for events that remind Americans it belongs to them.
Turning the White House into a place of celebration, culture, and public engagement, especially as we approach America’s 250th, strips away the myth that government is something distant and above the American people.
No surprise the Democrats despised last night’s UFC event, but what truly frustrates them is what it represents: a White House that feels like the people’s house again.
Tells you everything.
Rather than: “let’s make sure many more Americans can become trillionaires”
Instead it’s: “let’s make sure that no other Americans ever reach that level of success.”
These people are parasites. Explicitly opposed to human flourishing. Amazing.
To use the internet…
Now everyone will have to register to prove they are over 16 years old to use it.
See how that works?
We’re protecting the children immediately turns into you must register.
Next is the Social Credit Score.
Then they have you.
This must stop now.
https://t.co/R1qEya32oB
🚨 ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND THE END GOAL, EVERYTHING MAKES SENSE
Digital ID.
Digital currency.
Online age verification.
Bank account monitoring.
Centralised databases.
Each proposal is presented separately.
Each proposal sounds reasonable on its own.
But growing numbers of people are starting to ask whether they are all part of the same direction of travel.
More monitoring.
More verification.
More control.
The government says these measures are about convenience, safety and efficiency.
Critics see something very different.
And that is why opposition to digital ID is growing across Britain. @alanvibe
“Up until 16 - the only way in which you get to communicate - is the most radical Leftwing Site available”
It’s not a coincidence that both Australia & the UK have banned every social media site for U-16’s EXCEPT Bluesky - a site where MAPS & Trans Identify along with other radical Leftist ideology are promoted as normal.
Once they can verify who you are online, they no longer need police, courts, or judges to punish you, there’s no arrest, no trial, no physical prison cell.
You’re already inside the system, they just decide when to lock your cage, your bank account gets frozen, your ability to travel gets restricted, your carbon allowance runs out so you can’t buy fuel or meat, your social score drops because you said the wrong thing and suddenly you can’t buy, sell or even speak, you are cut off.
This is how they skip the entire legal system and go straight to total compliance, Agenda 2030, 15-minute cities, personal carbon credits, social credit all of it becomes enforceable the second this digital ID infrastructure is in place.
They’re not protecting your kids, they’re building the prison that your kids are going to grow up inside.
The difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is time and time is running out.
credit @wideawake_media@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU
Under the pretext of banning under-16s from social media to “protect the children,” Keir Starmer has snuck in some small print that should make Americans really glad that all the tea was dumped into the Boston harbour back in 1773.
Adults will still be “allowed” to use the platforms… once they’ve handed over facial recognition, digital ID, passport, or credit card details to prove they’re not a child.
So it was never really about the kids. It was about making sure every single person who wants to speak online has to first tell the government exactly who they are.
Step 1: Link your real identity to your speech
Step 2: police have a lovely searchable database of every spicy take, meme, or complaint you’ve ever posted
Step 3: bring in the consequences - arrests, travel ban, debunking, for out-of-bounds speech
The UK is in a free fall.
The UK is set to ban 16 year olds and under from accessing social media.
What they don't tell you: All ADULTS will have to ID to access, X, Facebook and a list of 10 "high risk" sites (of which, Bluesky is strangely exempt).
This is NOT for kids, it's to police adult speech!
This is a backdoor, a huge one, to allow the UK gov to better monitor your speech online, arrest more for what they say, and bully and intimate you from speaking out.
If it were to actually protect kids, Bluesky would NOT be exempt. There are numerous profiles of MAPs (minor attracted persons) on Bsky and they do nothing. Bsky is the actual CSAM haven, and the fact they are exempt shows you this law was never about protecting kids.
Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky.
Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky.
This proves one thing.
It's not about protecting children.
It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.
So let me get this straight:
Leftists want 16 year olds to vote.
They want 12 year olds to be able to consent to sex changes.
But they don’t want those same teenagers to read conservative opinions on social media, only Blue Sky?
Their agenda is pretty obvious.