‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐
In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show.
According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed.
Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler.
She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th.
Two completely different stories. Only one can be true.
FOLLOW @RealCandaceO, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
There wasn’t a single piece of evidence presented that can definitively ID Tyler Robinson at the scene .
No evidence that Tyler’s Weapon was at the scene .
The only evidence of any weapon is an empty pistol holster and a bullet that the lead investigator linked to law enforcement .
The whole case is built on the testimony of the actual alleged gay trans furry , who doesn’t have an alibi , had access to all of Tyler’s property & said he gave Tyler the dremel .
He also discredited the motive.
The levels of gaslighting about this is the worst I’ve seen since Covid.
People don't believe the information in these posts that Tyler was 3 hours away during the time of the "texts", but they can see clearly that this person in the photo is Tyler Robinson..... 😂🤣......May you all get the jury you deserve in life.
🚨 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT?
I’ve been comparing testimony and something stood out.
During the preliminary hearing, the defense questioned Agent Hull about Ms. Noble’s eyewitness account, arguing that her testimony included additional details such as seeing a bald man driving the suspect’s Challenger with three other men that were not covered during the prosecution’s questioning.
Separately, a neighbor of Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs told a news outlet they reported seeing multiple vehicles with out-of-state license plates and what they described as suspicious individuals in the area roughly two weeks before the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Are these accounts completely unrelated, or do they raise questions investigators should address?
I’m not saying they’re connected. I’m saying the timeline and the differing accounts are worth examining.
Watch the hearings. Compare the witness statements. Decide for yourself.
👇
#CharlieKirk #BreakingNews #Tylerrobinson #Court #Investigate #News #QuestionEverything
Okay, let’s say that is Tyler arriving at campus the first time. What is the first step in “patsy planning”? You need to show the subject at the location of the crime, at least once. Prosecutor said Tyler met with TPUSA Representatives, then left. So someone from TPUSA lured Tyler to UVU to secure initial visit. After that, you can use multiple decoys to assert that all of the images/video that day are of Tyler. Explains the multiple variances in decoy physical features and clothing changes. It’s really quite simple.
@KanekoaTheGreat@RealCandaceO Are we just going to pretend the forensic examiner didn’t confirm under oath that a back pack of item sent for dna analysis, believed to have been left behind by a suspect, belonged to someone in Charlie’s detail. And the investigators chose NOT to run down the lead. 👇🏻
🚨 RED FLAGS EVERYWHERE in the Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial 👀
Watch this courtroom exchange Prosecutors’ witness grilled on the Ring camera footage and Ms. Noble interview. She allegedly described a bald driver + three other people in the suspect vehicle… but suddenly it’s “I don’t recall” and “we were just verifying the video.”
Why omit critical details about multiple occupants if this is an open-and-shut lone gunman case?
The clip dives into reports on Tyler Robinson’s living situation with a transgender partner and early neighbor sightings of out-of-state plates and suspicious activity. Coincidence or something bigger?
This feels like another rushed narrative. Single bullet from a rooftop, “overwhelming” DNA claims, but dodging questions on the full crew involved? Reminds me of other high profile cases where the patsy gets pinned while deeper players walk. Charlie Kirk bold voice for faith, conservatism, and truth taken out at UVU. Who really benefits from silencing him?
What do YOU see here?
Coordinated hit with multiple people?
Media/prosecutors burying inconvenient witness statements?
Or am I missing something?
Drop your theories, evidence below.
Share this far and wide if you have more questions than answers.
let’s honor Charlie by questioning everything.
#CharlieKirk #TylerRobinson