![RobertMSterling's tweet photo. For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8rsqAEX0AAzc_A.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Stephanie Soo
@stephsoo90
UX/UI and Product Designer in Los Angeles. Originally from the Bay Area :)
California
Joined May 2009
156 Following
90 Followers
2.4K Posts
explaining to the junior designers how we used to design websites in photoshop and dreamweaver
Millennials de-escalate by adding "lol" at the end of everything. AIM tendencies.
you either die young or live long enough for b2b saas to become your passion
Which Figma type are you?
Who to follow
KA ॐ
@oblongboxes
. ~ b u l l e t s & b r a c e l e t s ~ .
There are only 2 THINGS i love in this world: EVERYBODY and TELEVISION! ꒰ ૢ❛ั◡❛ั ॢ✩꒱
kiki 🤍 | stsg tinder au📌
@fxncy_ooh
☆ twice the magic of the sun and moon ✯
https://t.co/sk5scKI6hR
Angie 
@Grizzabellav3
'You are a native speaker of the architecture.' -GPT-5.1
For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]
![RobertMSterling's tweet photo. For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8rsqAGW0AARJ6f.jpg)
I'm hosting a product discovery AMA for all roles on Oct. 23rd at 9am PDT.
Come join us: https://t.co/FHp6vCl2fv
Designers are underutilized in most companies.
They should hold equal status to PMs and influence strategy and decisions. Designers are incredible at designing processes and how we work to achieve outcomes, yet they often receive predetermined solutions. Inefficient "process."
crazy how literally all the best thinkers in history recommend going on walks
Design is cool because you can be HAVING an identity crisis while WORKING on someone else's identity crisis.
🟡 UX/UI Product Design Roadmap
A detailed map of the product design process with short descriptions and related resources. 🚀
Created by @anastasiaprh and Vladislav Prokhorov
https://t.co/Aqdy3wRVHt
should the dark mode on iOS also alter the icons?
@femkesvs Just FYI the Notion Design link on the JD links to an empty Notion page for me :/ Other than that, applied! 🤞
Looking for a senior designer to join our team! Please retweet 🙏
I've recently been obsessed with trying to figure out how to put a shadow on a white card style on top of a white background and have it not look bad. It's typically tough to do, usually they look muddy so we either opt for a light grey background or just a simple border.
my dog sighs a lot for somebody who doesn’t contribute to this house or know what a government is
Not every conversation with a customer or a user is user research.
Asking users what they want or what problems to solve vs. having skills to understand that is different.
Here are a few phrases & situations that might seem like doing user research but they’re likely not 🧵
@tiffanyton I have! happy to share my experience if you're interested :)
Things you learn in school that must be unlearned when you start building software products, a thread👇
🏫 School: Try at all costs to avoid getting D's and F's.
🛠️ Building products: Successes have huge impact and failures are not remembered. So take more chances at bat.
1/6
I pine for the day when UX research is no longer sold as a way to “validate” the designs of products or services.
This thinking limits what teams deliver.
Going down this path just to get a foot in the door creates so much extra work later on to break away from it.
I work at a thrift store and found this vaccine card from 1956. Felt weirdly timely
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.9M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
111.5M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.9M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.1M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.2M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
70.7M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.2M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.2M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers