@GodoyJW@pimitopomo Si querían mostrar religión fomentando la violencia, podrían usar al Patriarca Kirill bendiciendo misiles o a clérigos radicales de Medio Oriente. Elegir a las víctimas es una decisión editorial cínica, no neutralidad teológica.
@GodoyJW@pimitopomo Entiendo la lógica de su cosmovisión. Pero el problema es el contexto. El artículo etiqueta esto como "incitar al odio" y "fomentar la violencia". Defender tu hogar del genocidio es supervivencia, no incitar al odio.
@pimitopomo As someone in Ukraine, I find this disgusting. They took a 2021 photo and used an army defending itself against genocide as an obstacle to peace. Equating the victim with the aggressor just to generate leads for a Bible study is their true 'neutrality'.
@pimitopomo I'll add to this. The Organization worked on this single public issue for a year, but the worst part isn't the text; it's the visuals. On page 9, to illustrate religions that 'incite hatred', they chose a photo of a priest blessing Ukrainian soldiers.