What a day…so grateful for the support of clerks, colleagues and especially family. Amongst many highlights was turning round after bowing to the Lord Chancellor to see an entire row of junior barristers who were my current or former pupils and juniors 😊
Today, April 22 is Stephen Lawrence Day.🖤
33 years ago in 1993, Stephen at just 18 years was stabbed to death in a racist attack in Eltham, south east London. 🙏🏾
Today, we reflect on this death but more importantly we stand with his family and the Stephen Lawrence foundation to help build in his name for future generations.
As @sldayfdn have stated, this years theme is Every Future Needs a Foundation - to support young people and their ambitions.
Please support the Stephen Lawrence Foundation and their plans however you can.
#wewillneverforget #stephenlawrenceday
‘The key issue is not only what happens with regard to what a child is entitled to, but also whether that entitlement can be enforced’: two @IPSEAcharity legal experts issue a warning about the government’s SEND plans
https://t.co/5wBbXTTm5v
📢 We are hiring!
We're looking for a Public Affairs Manager to help lead and shape our advocacy and influencing work at a critical time!
Deadline: Monday 27 April, 11.59pm
Apply on our website: https://t.co/nOHRMd4Yux.
📢Coming up NEXT MONTH!
Four webinars on 21, 23, 28 & 30 April that guide decision-makers in public bodies & those supporting them, on acting fairly and within the law.
Presented in partnership with @publiclawprojct & @39EssexChambers.
Book here ➡️ https://t.co/8RSxO2WVlH
The UK government received criticism for its proposed SEND reforms.
We tell @lawsocgazette that it if children don't have the support they are entitled to then lawyers must be allowed to do their jobs to help parents secure the best for their children.
https://t.co/66mdt8pUv7
REGISTER NOW! SNJ’s Schools White Paper SEND Legal Roundtable with @SteveBroach KC, @haylez10 (Hayley Mason-Seager), @IPSEAcharity & @SOS_SEN
https://t.co/XB8J8AGhML
We're pleased to be joining @SpcialNdsJungle for this webinar exploring the proposed SEND reforms in the Schools White Paper. Register here: https://t.co/ddllKvKXNb
Government SEND law reforms assessed by specialist lawyers:
- Predetermined ‘packages’ of support will displace current provision.
- A weakened SEND Tribunal may mean pupils left without a school place.
https://t.co/76GS78uHNA
@semaphorist@AudreySuffolk Audrey’s post made me smile - I have hundreds in my files re disability, race, religion - but none where I have a link to hand I’m afraid
They’re characterised by:
- no engagement with the statutory ‘needs’
- superficial detriment
- rush to mitigation
I can’t see how reducing the power of the Tribunal in this key area is in any way necessary to achieve any of the government’s stated policy objectives in the reforms
What is the principled justification for proposing to remove the Tribunal’s power to name a placement for a child? I can’t see anything on this in the consultation paper - and we are told these proposals are driven by principle #SEND
@ms_peaceweaver It would allow LAs to refuse to place a child at a particular school, and the Tribunal could only quash that decision and require the LA to reconsider - whereas now the Tribunal could order the school the family want to be named
Interested to see what part of the EHCP process Ministers may think we don’t need - is it where:
- we identify all the child’s special educational needs?
- we specify the provision reasonably required to meet those needs?
- the child gets the right to attend a suitable school?
Those advocating for reduced powers for the SEND Tribunal always seem to forget that it is the current extensive powers that make the Tribunal an alternative remedy to judicial review. Doubt the SoS or her officials actually want to see school placement disputes in the High Court
“[SEND] tribunals will no longer have the power to direct a pupil to be placed in a specific school, only to require councils to re-run assessments”
Drip, drip
https://t.co/TyHBfDIDgr via @ft